AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. Reports Fourth Quarter Earnings

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–
AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. (“MITT” or the “Company”) (NYSE: MITT – News) today reported net income for the quarter ended December 31, 2011 of $5.8 million and net book value of $20.52 per share.
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

• Net income of $5.8 million, or 0.58 per share for the fourth quarter
• Net income of $19.0 million, or $3.20 per share for the period from March 7, 2011 to December 31, 2011
• Core Earnings of $6.5 million or $0.65 per share for the quarter
• Core Earnings of $12.4 million, or $1.24 per share for the period from July 6, 2011 (the consummation of our initial public offering) to December 31, 2011
• Net realized gains of $2.9 million, or $0.29 per share, on Agency RMBS for the fourth quarter and $7.2 million, or $0.72 per share, for the period from July 6, 2011 to December 31, 2011
• Net realized losses of ($3.5) million, or ($0.35) per share, on credit investments for the fourth quarter and for the period from July 6, 2011 to December 31, 2011
• $0.70 per share dividend declared for the fourth quarter and $1.10 per share dividends declared for the period ended December 31, 2011
• Approximately $0.46 per share of undistributed taxable income as of December 31, 2011(1)
• $20.52 net book value per share as of December 31, 2011(1)

INVESTMENT HIGHLIGHTS

• $1.4 billion investment portfolio value as of December 31, 2011 (2) (4)
• 5.86x leverage as of December 31, 2011 (2) (3)
• 91.0% Agency RMBS investment portfolio (4)
• 9.0% credit investment portfolio, comprising Non-Agency RMBS, CMBS and ABS assets (4)
• 5.0% constant prepayment rate (“CPR”) for the fourth quarter on the Agency RMBS investment portfolio (5)
• 2.25% net interest margin as of December 31, 2011 (6)

FOURTH QUARTER 2011 AND PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011 RESULTS
AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. is an actively managed REIT that opportunistically invests in a diversified risk-adjusted portfolio of Agency RMBS, Non-Agency RMBS, CMBS and ABS. For the fourth quarter, the Company had net income of $5.8 million, or $0.58 per diluted share, and Core Earnings of $6.5 million, or $0.65 per diluted share. For the period from March 7, 2011 to December 31, 2011, the Company had net income of $19.0 million, or $3.20 per diluted share (7), and for the period from July 6, 2011 to December 31, 2011 (“period ended December 31, 2011”), the Company had Core Earnings of $12.4 million, or $1.24 per diluted share. Core Earnings represents a non-GAAP financial measure and is defined as net income (loss) excluding (i) net realized gain (loss) on investments and terminations on derivative contracts and (ii) net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments and derivative contacts. (See “Non-GAAP Financial Measure” below for further detail on Core Earnings)
David Roberts, Chief Executive Officer, commented “We are pleased to announce our fourth quarter earnings. During the quarter, Core Earnings increased to $0.65 per share and we announced our first full quarter dividend of $0.70 per share. In addition to meeting our financial goals, we continued to diversify funding relationships and in January we were able to successfully complete an equity raise which has improved our stock’s liquidity. We are proud of our accomplishments over the last two quarters and look forward to the opportunities ahead.”
“Amidst uncertainty in the global markets, European liquidity difficulties and year-end funding pressures, we continued to optimize our Agency portfolio, opportunistically rotate the credit portfolio and retain capital for potential market dislocations,” said Jonathan Lieberman, Chief Investment Officer. “While Agency RMBS yields have compressed, we believe the low interest rate environment and a carefully selected investment portfolio will continue to support attractive risk-adjusted returns. Over the course of the quarter, we rotated a significant portion of the Agency portfolio into securities with more favorable prepayment attributes to further mitigate prepayment risk. Allocations to credit securities were concentrated in less volatile short duration Non-Agency securities and CMBS tranches with superior intrinsic value. We believe MITT is well positioned to continue to produce sustainable returns and take advantage of the opportunities ahead in both the Agency RMBS and credit markets. With the success of the European Central Bank’s Long-Term Refinancing Operation, funding risks have materially declined and we anticipate deploying capital in a more aggressive style. New capital from our January equity transaction allows greater latitude to the investment team to selectively increase our capital allocation to credit opportunities.”

KEY STATISTICS (2)
		Weighted Average at						Weighted Average
		December 31, 2011						at September 30, 2011
Investment portfolio		$	1,388,006,801					$	1,332,205,377
Repurchase agreements		$	1,189,303,407					$	1,126,859,885
Stockholders’ equity		$	206,283,920					$	207,413,703
Leverage ratio		5.86x			(3	)		5.70x			(3	)
Swap ratio			66	%	(8	)			51	%	(8	)
Yield on investment portfolio			3.16	%	(9	)			3.26	%	(9	)
Cost of funds			0.91	%	(10	)			0.82	%	(10	)
Net interest margin			2.25	%	(6	)			2.44	%	(6	)
Management fees			1.49	%	(11	)			1.43	%	(11	)
Other operating expenses			1.57	%	(12	)			1.58	%	(12	)
Book value, per share		$	20.52		(1	)		$	20.64		(1	)
Dividend, per share		$	0.70					$	0.40

INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO
The following summarizes the Company’s investment portfolio as of December 31, 2011 (2):

														Weighted Average
		Current Face			Premium (Discount)				Amortized Cost		Fair Value			Coupon		Yield
Agency RMBS:
15-Year Fixed Rate		$	738,344,948		$	22,525,476			$	760,870,424	$	772,310,909		3.32	%	2.62	%
20-Year Fixed Rate			227,566,114			7,362,001				234,928,115		237,586,837		3.69	%	3.00	%
30-Year Fixed Rate			232,890,169			12,162,512				245,052,681		246,679,482		3.99	%	3.18	%
Interest Only			43,505,596			(34,046,500	)			9,459,096		6,636,871		5.50	%	3.45	%
Non-Agency RMBS			102,246,062			(8,980,754	)			93,265,308		90,368,316		5.90	%	6.31	%
CMBS			19,500,000			(5,411,965	)			14,088,035		13,537,851		5.88	%	13.44	%
ABS			21,046,150			(34,497	)			21,011,653		20,886,535		4.50	%	4.50	%
Total		$	1,385,099,039		$	(6,423,727	)		$	1,378,675,312	$	1,388,006,801		3.81	%	3.16	%

As of December 31, 2011, the weighted average yield on the Company’s investment portfolio was 3.16% and its weighted average cost of funds was 0.91%. This resulted in a net interest margin of 2.25% as of December 31, 2011. (6)
The CPR for the Agency RMBS portfolio was 5.0% for the fourth quarter and 5.0% for the month of December 2011. (5)
The weighted average cost basis of the Agency investment portfolio, excluding interest-only securities, was 103.5% as of December 31, 2011. The amortization of premiums (net of any accretion of discounts) on Agency securities for the fourth quarter was $1.9 million, or $(0.19) per share. The unamortized net Agency premium as of December 31, 2011 was $42.0 million.
Premiums and discounts associated with purchases of the Company’s securities are amortized or accreted into interest income over the estimated life of such securities, using the effective yield method. Since the cost basis of the Company’s Agency securities, excluding interest-only securities, exceeds the underlying principal balance by 3.5% as of December 31, 2011, slower actual and projected prepayments can have a meaningful positive impact, while faster actual or projected prepayments can have a meaningful negative impact on the Company’s asset yields.
We have also entered into “to-be-announced” (“TBA”) positions to facilitate the future purchase of Agency RMBS. Under the terms of these TBAs, the Company agrees to purchase, for future delivery, Agency RMBS with certain principal and interest specifications and certain types of underlying collateral, but the particular Agency RMBS to be delivered are not identified until shortly before (generally two days) the TBA settlement date. At December 31, 2011, we had $100 million net notional amount of TBA positions with a net weighted average purchase price of 103.8%. As of December 31, 2011, our TBA portfolio had a net weighted average yield at purchase of 3.01% and a net weighted average settlement date of February 5, 2012. We have recorded derivative assets of $1.4 million and derivative liabilities of $0.5 million, reflecting these TBA positions.
LEVERAGE AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
The investment portfolio is financed with repurchase agreements as of December 31, 2011 as summarized below:

		Agency RMBS						Non-Agency RMBS / CMBS / Other
Repurchase Agreements Maturing Within:		Balance			Weighted Average Rate			Balance			Weighted Average Rate
30 days or less		$	652,002,000		0.35	%		$	68,187,000		1.74	%
31-60 days			334,825,407		0.42	%			1,749,000		1.95	%
61-90 days			118,340,000		0.37	%			14,200,000		1.80	%
Greater than 90 days			-		-				-		-
Total / Weighted Average		$	1,105,167,407		0.37	%		$	84,136,000		1.75	%

As of December 31, 2011, the Company had entered into repurchase agreements with twenty-one counterparties. We continue to rebalance our exposures to counterparties and add new counterparties.
We have entered into interest rate swap agreements to hedge our portfolio. The Company’s swaps as of December 31, 2011 are summarized as follows:

Maturity		Notional Amount			Weighted Average Pay Rate			Weighted Average Receive Rate*			Weighted Average Years to Maturity
2012		$	100,000,000		0.354	%		0.285	%		0.14
2013			182,000,000		0.535	%		0.286	%		1.78
2014			204,500,000		1.000	%		0.395	%		2.54
2015			184,025,000		1.412	%		0.380	%		3.56
2016			87,500,000		1.625	%		0.328	%		4.63
2018			35,000,000		1.728	%		0.511	%		6.88
Total/Wtd Avg		$	793,025,000		1.008	%		0.350	%		2.72
* Approximately 50% of our interest rate swap notionals reset monthly based on one-month LIBOR and 50% of our interest rate swap notionals reset quarterly based on three-month LIBOR.

TAXABLE INCOME
The primary differences between taxable income and GAAP net income include (i) unrealized gains and losses associated with investment and derivative portfolios are marked-to-market in current income for GAAP purposes, but excluded from taxable income until realized or settled, (ii) temporary differences related to amortization of net premiums paid on investments (iii) the timing and amount of deductions related to stock-based compensation and (iv) excise taxes. As of December 31, 2011, the Company had undistributed taxable income of approximately $0.46 per share.
DIVIDEND
On December 14, 2011, the Company declared a dividend of $0.70 per share of common stock to stockholders of record as of December 30, 2011 and paid such dividend on January 27, 2012. The Company declared dividends of $1.10 per share for the period ended December 31, 2011.
SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On January 24, 2012, the Company completed a follow-on offering of 5,000,000 shares of its common stock and subsequently issued an additional 750,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the underwriters’ over-allotments at a price of $19.00 per share, for gross proceeds of approximately $109.3 million. Net proceeds to the Company from the offerings were approximately $104.1 million, net of issuance costs of approximately $5.2 million.
SHAREHOLDER CALL
The Company invites shareholders, prospective shareholders and analysts to attend MITT’s fourth quarter earnings conference call on March 1, 2012 at 11:00 am Eastern Time. The shareholder call can be accessed by dialing (888) 424-8151 (U.S. domestic) or (847) 585-4422 (international). Please enter code number 8732511#.
A presentation will accompany the conference call and will be available on the Company’s website at www.agmit.com. Select the Q4 2011 Earnings Presentation link to download and print the presentation in advance of the shareholder call.
An audio replay of the shareholder call combined with the presentation will be made available on our website after the call. The replay will be available until midnight on March 15, 2012. If you are interested in hearing the replay, please dial (888) 843-7419 (U.S. domestic) or (630) 652-3042 (international). The conference ID number is 8732511#.
For further information or questions, please contact Allan Krinsman, the Company’s General Counsel, at (212) 883-4180 or akrinsman@angelogordon.com.
ABOUT AG MORTGAGE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. is a real estate investment trust that invests in, acquires and manages a diversified portfolio of residential mortgage assets, other real estate-related securities and financial assets. AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. is externally managed and advised by AG REIT Management, LLC, a subsidiary of Angelo, Gordon & Co., L.P., an SEC-registered investment adviser that specializes in alternative investment activities.
Additional information can be found on the Company’s website at www.agmit.com.
ABOUT ANGELO, GORDON & CO.
Angelo, Gordon & Co. was founded in 1988 and has approximately $22 billion under management. Currently, the firm’s investment disciplines encompass five principal areas: (i) distressed debt and leveraged loans, (ii) real estate, (iii) mortgage-backed securities and other structured credit, (iv) private equity and special situations and (v) a number of hedge fund strategies. Angelo, Gordon & Co. employs over 250 employees, including more than 90 investment professionals, and is headquartered in New York, with associated offices in Amsterdam, Chicago, Los Angeles, London, Hong Kong Seoul, Shanghai, Sydney and Tokyo.
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This press release includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are based on estimates, projections, beliefs and assumptions of management of the Company at the time of such statements and are not guarantees of future performance. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties in predicting future results and conditions. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in these forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors, including, without limitation, changes in interest rates, changes in the yield curve, changes in prepayment rates, the availability and terms of financing, changes in the market value of our assets, general economic conditions, market conditions, conditions in the market for Agency securities, and legislative and regulatory changes that could adversely affect the business of the Company. Additional information concerning these and other risk factors are contained in the Company’s most recent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Copies are available on the SEC’s website, http://www.sec.gov/. The Company does not undertake or accept any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements to reflect any change in its expectations or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based.

AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
			December 31, 2011			April 1, 2011
Assets			(Unaudited)
Real Estate securities, at fair value
Agency – $1,186,149,842 pledged as collateral			$	1,263,214,099		$	-
Non-Agency – $47,227,005 pledged as collateral				58,787,051			-
CMBS – $2,747,080 pledged as collateral				13,537,851			-
ABS – $4,526,620 pledged as collateral				4,526,620			-
Linked transactions, net, at fair value				8,787,180			-
Cash and cash equivalents				35,851,249			1,000
Restricted cash				3,037,055			-
Interest receivable				4,219,640			-
Derivative assets, at fair value				1,428,595			-
Prepaid expenses				317,950			-
Due from broker				341,491
Due from affiliates				104,994			-
Deferred costs				52,176			-
Total Assets			$	1,394,205,951		$	1,000
Liabilities
Repurchase agreements			$	1,150,149,407		$	-
Payable on unsettled trades				18,759,200			-
Interest payable				2,275,138			-
Derivative liabilities, at fair value				7,908,308			-
Dividend payable				7,011,171			-
Due to affiliates				770,341			-
Accrued expenses				668,552			-
Due to broker				379,914			-
Total Liabilities				1,187,922,031			-
Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share; 450,000,000 and 1,000 shares of common stock authorized and 10,009,958 and 100 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2011 and April 1, 2011, respectively				100,100			1
Additional paid-in capital				198,228,694			999
Retained earnings				7,955,126			-
				206,283,920			1,000
Total Liabilities & Equity			$	1,394,205,951		$	1,000

AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
							Period from
			Quarter Ended				March 7, 2011 to
			December 31, 2011				December 31, 2011
Net Interest Income
Interest income			$	10,022,275			$	18,748,669
Interest expense				1,106,097				1,696,344
				8,916,178				17,052,325
Other Income (Loss)
Net realized gain (loss)				(589,747	)			3,701,392
Gain (loss) on linked transactions, net				(1,013,291	)			(808,564	)
Realized loss on periodic interest settlements of interest rate swaps, net				(1,175,788	)			(2,162,290	)
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments, net				70,663				(6,491,430	)
Unrealized gain (loss) on real estate securities				1,346,237				11,040,692
				(1,361,926	)			5,279,800
Expenses
Management fee to affiliate				770,341				1,512,898
Other operating expenses				811,372				1,566,642
Equity based compensation to affiliate				97,343				176,165
Excise tax				105,724				105,724
				1,784,780				3,361,429
Net Income (Loss)			$	5,769,472			$	18,970,696
Earnings Per Share of Common Stock
Basic			$	0.58			$	3.20
Diluted			$	0.58			$	3.20
Weighted Average Number of Shares of Common Stock Outstanding
Basic				10,009,958				5,933,930
Diluted				10,010,799				5,933,930
Dividends Declared per Share of Common Stock			$	0.70			$	1.10

Non-GAAP Financial Measure
This press release contains Core Earnings, a non-GAAP financial measure. AG Mortgage Investment Trust’s management believes that this non-GAAP measure, when considered with GAAP, provides supplemental information useful in evaluating the results of the Company’s operations. This non-GAAP measure should not be considered a substitute, or superior to, the financial measures calculated in accordance with GAAP. Our GAAP financial results and the reconciliations from these results should be carefully evaluated.
Core Earnings are defined by the Company as net income excluding both realized and unrealized gains (losses) on the sale or termination of securities, including underlying linked transactions and derivatives. As defined, Core Earnings include the net interest earned on these transactions, including credit derivatives, linked transactions, inverse Agency securities, interest rate derivatives or any other investment activity that may earn net interest. One of the objectives of the Company is to generate net income from net interest margin on the portfolio and management uses Core Earnings to measure this objective.
A reconciliation of GAAP net income to Core Earnings for the quarter and period ended December 31, 2011 is set forth below:

						Period from
		Quarter Ended				March 7, 2011 to
		December 31, 2011				December 31, 2011
Net income/loss		$	5,769,472			$	18,970,696
Add (Deduct):
Net realized gain			589,747				(3,701,392	)
Gain/loss on linked transactions, net			1,013,291				808,564
Net interest income on linked transactions			554,729				900,638
Unrealized gain/loss on derivative instruments, net			(70,663	)			6,491,430
Unrealized gain/loss on real estate securities			(1,346,237	)			(11,040,692	)
Core Earnings		$	6,510,339			$	12,429,244

Footnotes
(1) Per share figures are calculated using outstanding shares including all shares granted to our Manager and our independent directors under our equity incentive plans as of quarter end.
(2) Generally when we purchase a security and finance it with a repurchase agreement, the security is included in our assets and the repurchase agreement is separately reflected in our liabilities on our balance sheet. For securities with certain characteristics (including those which are not readily obtainable in the market place) that are purchased and then simultaneously sold back to the seller under a repurchase agreement, US GAAP requires these transactions be netted together and recorded as a forward purchase commitment. Throughout this press release where we disclose our investment portfolio and the repurchase agreements that finance it, including our leverage metrics, we have un-linked the transaction and used the gross presentation as used for all other securities. This presentation is consistent with how the Company’s management evaluates the business, and believes provides the most accurate depiction of the Company’s investment portfolio and financial condition.
(3) Calculated by dividing total repurchase agreements, including $39.2 million included in linked transactions, plus payable on unsettled trades on our GAAP balance sheet by our GAAP stockholders’ equity.
(4) The total investment portfolio is calculated by summing the fair market value of our Agency RMBS, Non-Agency RMBS, CMBS and ABS assets, including linked transactions. The percentage of Agency RMBS and credit investments are calculated by dividing the respective fair market value of each, including linked transactions, by the total investment portfolio.
(5) This represents the weighted average monthly CPRs published during the period for our in-place portfolio during the same period.
(6) Net interest margin is calculated by subtracting the weighted average cost of funds from the weighted average yield for the Company’s investment portfolio, which excludes cash held by the Company. See footnotes (9) and (10) for further detail.
(7) Diluted per share figures are calculated using weighted average outstanding shares in accordance with GAAP. For the period from March 7, 2011 to December 31, 2011, the calculation reflected the impact of 100 shares outstanding from July 1, 2011 through the settlement date of our IPO.
(8) The swap ratio was calculated by dividing the notional value of our interest rate swaps by total repurchase agreements, including those included in linked transactions, plus payable on unsettled trades.
(9) The yield on our investment portfolio during the period represents an effective interest rate, which utilizes all estimates of future cash flows and adjusts for actual prepayment and cash flow activity as of quarter end. This calculation excludes cash held by the Company.
(10) The cost of funds was calculated as the sum of the weighted average rate on the repurchase agreements outstanding at quarter end and the weighted average net pay rate on our interest rate swaps. Both elements of the cost of funds were weighted by the repurchase agreements outstanding at quarter end.
(11) The management fee percentage at quarter end was calculated by annualizing management fees incurred during the quarter and dividing by quarter-ended stockholders’ equity.
(12) The other operating expenses percentage at quarter end was calculated by annualizing other operating expenses recorded during the quarter and dividing by quarter-ended stockholders’ equity.
http://tourism9.com/    http://vkins.com/

ECB to offer banks billions in cheap loans

The European Central Bank is expected to pump half a trillion euros in ultra-cheap, three-year loans into the eurozone’s troubled financial system today.
In the second such operation to fight the eurozone crisis, banks can stock up on as much of the cheap funding as they like – a ploy the ECB unveiled late last year to dampen tensions on eurozone bond markets.
ECB President Mario Draghi said after the first of the operations that “a major credit crunch” had been averted.
Banks used much of the €489bn they borrowed last year to cover maturing debt.
Mr Draghi has urged them to lend out the funds they tap at today’s operation to households and businesses, helping strengthen economic growth.
Financial markets are monitoring the progress of the longer-term refinancing operations.
The LTROs are unleashing a wall of money just as the US Federal Reserve and the Bank of England have with their quantitative easing (QE) programmes.
The ECB operations differ from QE in that they provide liquidity against guarantees instead of intervening directly in bond markets.
They achieve a similar result while allaying the concerns of some policymakers – led by the Germans – about funding governments.
ECB policymakers in Germany and beyond are nonetheless worried that the central bank risks storing up problems for the future by releasing the wave of cash through the LTROs.
http://tourism9.com/    http://vkins.com/

Loans flow from Europe’s central bank, but analysts debate if they’re a cure or a crutch

Throughout his waning months in office, European Central Bank President Jean-Claude Trichet boasted that he had avoided the excesses of his counterparts at the U.S. Federal Reserve and kept the ECB’s response to his continent’s financial crisis relatively modest.
It has taken his successor, Italian central banker Mario Draghi, less than three months to upend that approach, triggering a debate about whether the ECB has quietly solved the euro-zone debt crisis or simply postponed a reckoning by shuffling hundreds of billions of dollars among banks, governments and the central bank’s own coffers.

As it did in December, the ECB this week is again offering inexpensive three-year loans to euro-region banks. Market analysts expect the central bank to provide new loans worth a trillion dollars or more, putting the ECB on a fast track to catch the Fed.
The policy has stabilized European finances in recent weeks, contributing in a roundabout way to a decline in the exorbitant interest rates that some heavily indebted governments had to pay. After the first round of ECB loans, banks spent some of the money on government bonds, and Italy and Spain as a result saw a drop in the cost they had to pay to attract bond investors.
The banks also began to retire their own bonds, reducing the competition for money on private markets. And bank lending to households and businesses ticked up.
These were all reassuring developments after an autumn consumed by fears that the region’s debt crisis would lead to a breakup of the euro zone.
“There are tentative signs of stabilization,” Draghi said at a recent news conference on ECB policy.
But some analysts and bankers are warning that the policies under Draghi could leave the European financial industry addicted to cheap ECB loans that will be difficult to replace if the region’s economy remains stagnant.
For a variety of reasons, the euro zone remains in trouble. The region is heading into recession, and governments are scrambling to restructure economies ill-suited to compete globally or support the costs of aging populations.
Greece, the region’s hardest-hit country, is in the midst of a bond restructuring that will shape its future. If all goes smoothly, the exchange of new, less-expensive bonds for older ones will greatly reduce the country’s outstanding debts and pave the way for a large package of new international loans. But the debt restructuring has left the country in technical default on its bonds, possibly triggering the insurance payments to bond holders — a development that some analysts worry could stigmatize the euro region for years.
If nothing else, the ECB loans have bought time and helped the currency union through a bulge of borrowing required by governments and financial companies in the first months of the year.
The ECB lending program was launched at a critical moment, when borrowing costs for Spain and Italy were at such a high level that they might have needed a bailout that the rest of Europe and the International Monetary Fund could ill afford. As those rates have dropped, Spain has actually accelerated its borrowing for the year to take advantage.
http://tourism9.com/    http://vkins.com/

Saxo Bank Scoops 4 Awards at the Social Forex Awards 2011

SINGAPORE–(Marketwire -02/27/12)- Saxo Bank, the online trading and investment specialist, has won no less than four Awards at the inaugural Social Forex Awards 2011.
Saxo Bank ranked number one in the following categories:

• Most Social Bank (through the use of Social Media tools such as LinkedIn, Facebook and Twitter
• Best Social Campaign
• Best Social Initiative/Innovation
• Best Social Research

The Bank ranked second in a further three categories: Best iPhone/iPad app, Best Online Content and Most Social Website. Of 8 categories Saxo Bank was ranked in all but one.
The awards recognise the outstanding players in the industry and were presented by LetstalkFX and Social-Markets.net, in conjunction with e-Forex magazine and were sponsored by The Chicago Mercantile Exchange. The votes were cast by members of the letstalkFX.com community and marketing was undertaken by the Bank using LinkedIn and Facebook.
Disclaimer:Saxo Capital Markets Pte. Ltd. (“Saxo Capital Markets”) is licensed as a Capital Market Services provider and an Exempt Financial Advisor, and is supervised by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
You should carefully consider whether trading in leveraged products is appropriate for you in the light of your financial circumstances. You should be aware that dealing in products that are highly leveraged carry significantly greater risk than non-geared investments such as share trading. As such, you could both gain and lose large amounts of money. You may sustain losses in excess of the moneys you initially deposit and also in excess of the margin required to establish and maintain any positions in leveraged products.
For further information, please see:
http://sg.saxomarkets.com/about-us/general-disclaimer
About Saxo Capital Markets
Saxo Capital Markets Pte Ltd is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Saxo Bank A/S, the Copenhagen-headquartered online trading and investment specialist. It serves as the Asia Pacific headquarters and holds a Capital Markets Services license from the Monetary Authority of Singapore. Saxo Capital Markets also holds a Commodity Broker licence from The International Enterprise Singapore.
Clients can trade Forex, CFDs, Stocks, Futures, Options and other derivatives via SaxoWebTrader and SaxoTrader, its leading multi-asset online trading platforms.
SaxoTrader is available directly through Saxo Capital Markets or through one of its institutional clients. White labelling is a significant business area for Saxo Capital Markets, and involves customising and branding of its online trading platform for other financial institutions and brokers.
About Saxo Bank
Saxo Bank is a leading online trading and investment specialist. A fully licensed and regulated European bank, Saxo Bank enables private investors and institutional clients to trade FX, CFDs, ETFs, Stocks, Futures, Options and other derivatives via three specialised and fully integrated trading platforms: the browser-based SaxoWebTrader, the downloadable SaxoTrader and the SaxoMobileTrader application available in over 20 languages. Saxo Bank also offers professional portfolio and fund management through Saxo Asset Management who accommodates high-net-worth private clients and institutional investors and provides banking services and advice to retail clients through Saxo Privatbank. The Saxo Bank Group is headquartered in Copenhagen with offices throughout Europe, Asia, Middle East, Latin America and Australia.
http://tourism9.com/    http://vkins.com/

Private Equity, Finance Lawyer Melinda Rishkofski Joins Baker Botts L.L.P. as Partner in Moscow

MOSCOW, February 28, 2012 /PRNewswire/ –
Melinda Rishkofski, who has represented private equity fund managers, international financial institutions and portfolio companies in Russia, Eastern Europe, the UK and the US, has joined Baker Botts L.L.P. as a partner in the firm´s Moscow office.
(Photo: http://photos.prnewswire.com/prnh/20120228/DA58239)
(Logo: http://photos.prnewswire.com/prnh/20100503/BAKERBOTTSLOGO)
Rishkofski´s experience includes working with Russian and Eastern European privatization policies, policy advice and drafting laws for the new Russian economy, development of Russian corporate securities and regulatory structures. She also worked on regulatory and legislative matters with representatives for the U.S. and Russian governments.
“Melinda adds depth to our international transactional resources, ” said Baker Botts Managing Partner Walt Smith. “Her focus on the Russian market and her extensive private equity experience are significant additions to our client offerings.”
Prior to joining Baker Botts, Rishkofski was general counsel for Russian-based Baring Vostok Capital Partners. As principal advisor, negotiator and transaction counsel, she provided legal support to financial institutions, multilateral development banks, private equity fund managers and Russian companies with respect to debt and equity financing transactions, mergers and acquisitions, restructurings, employee incentive programs, dispute resolution and general corporate matters.
In this role, Rishkofski has worked with and served more than 35 investee companies and the legal needs of private equity investment funds with more than $2 billion in capital and assets. She has also worked extensively with the International Finance Corporation (IFC), the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) and the Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC) on secured credit and debt and equity financing transactions.
“Melinda´s extensive knowledge of the private equity and funds sector in Russia and the CIS, a market sector where we expect to see significant increased activity in 2012, will provide our clients working in or entering into this sector an expertise not currently available from legal consultants in the region, ” said Steven Wardlaw, Partner in Charge of Baker Botts´ Moscow office.
Rishkofski obtained a BS from the Pennsylvania State University in the U.S., a J.D. from the Dickinson School of Law (now part of the Pennsylvania State University), and an LL.M in International Business and Finance from the University of London, Kings College in the UK.
About Baker Botts L.L.P.
Baker Botts is an international law firm with over 725 lawyers and a network of 13 offices around the globe. Based on our experience and knowledge of our clients´ industries, we are recognized as a leading firm in the energy, technology and life sciences sectors. Throughout our 172-year history, we have provided creative and effective legal solutions for our clients while demonstrating an unrelenting commitment to excellence. For more information, please visit http://www.bakerbotts.com/.
http://tourism9.com/    http://vkins.com/

Stephen Winningham Joins Houlihan Lokey as Co-Head of European Corporate Finance

LONDON–(BUSINESS WIRE)–
Houlihan Lokey, an international investment bank, announced today that Stephen Winningham has joined as Managing Director and Co-Head of European Corporate Finance in the firm’s London office.
Mr. Winningham, formerly with Lloyds Banking Group, will work alongside Brian McKay, Managing Director and fellow Co-Head of European Corporate Finance, and will focus on further developing the firm’s European M&A and financing business. He will report to Scott Adelson and Robert Hotz, Senior Managing Directors and Global Co-Heads of the firm’s Corporate Finance business.
Mr. Winningham was recently head of Major Corporates at Lloyds Banking Group, overseeing the group’s coverage of U.K. and U.S. investment grade corporate clients. Prior to this, he was global head of Lloyds Banking Group’s Financial Institutions business.
“Stephen’s extensive international experience and proven track record in building client relationships will be instrumental in further enhancing our European and cross-border coverage,” said Scott Adelson. “Stephen’s appointment underlines our commitment to provide fully-integrated client focused advisory services to our corporate clients. He will be working closely with our sector and product specialists to build on the strong presence Houlihan Lokey has already created in the region,” added Robert Hotz.
“I’m delighted to join the firm at a time when there is an increasing need for independent strategic advice in the marketplace, which is something that Houlihan Lokey specializes in,” said Stephen Winningham. “I look forward to contributing to our growth strategy and further enhancing our client offering.”
Mr. Winningham brings with him three decades of experience in investment banking and commercial banking. Prior to Lloyds Banking Group, he was group head of the Asia Industrials and M&A groups at Salomon Brothers/Citigroup in Hong Kong. He also held leadership roles at Paine Webber Inc. and Kidder Peabody & Co. in New York (both now part of the UBS Group). He started his investment banking career at Drexel Burnham Lambert. Mr. Winningham holds a MBA from Columbia University and a bachelor’s degree from Colgate University in New York. He undertook additional graduate level studies in economics at New York University.
About Houlihan Lokey
Houlihan Lokey is an international investment bank with expertise in mergers and acquisitions, capital markets, financial restructuring, and valuation serving clients for 40 years. The firm is ranked globally as the No. 1 restructuring advisor, the No. 1 M&A fairness opinion advisor over the past 10 years, and the No. 1 M&A advisor for U.S. transactions under $1 billion, according to Thomson Reuters. Houlihan Lokey has 14 offices and more than 850 employees in Europe, the United States and Asia. The firm serves more than 1,000 clients each year, ranging from closely held companies to Global 500 corporations. For more information, visit http://www.hl.com/.
http://tourism9.com/    http://vkins.com/

EU, Indonesia negotiate partnership

Jakarta (The Jakarta Post/ANN) – Indonesia and the European Union (EU) began negotiations on Monday on a comprehensive economic partnership agreement (CEPA) that seeks to eliminate over 95 per cent of import tariffs on goods and improve bilateral investment.
The chief operating officer of the EU’s external action service, David O’Sullivan, said the Indonesia-European Union CEPA would be very important for the economic growth of both regions amidst the global economic turmoil.
“We already are a major trading and investment partner of Indonesia. In fact, we have huge complementarity. We believe it is very beneficial in terms of trade and investment to have an agreement with Indonesia. It is a win-win solution for both sides,¿ O’Sullivan said.
The EU has a combined non oil and gas trade value of US$32 billion in 2011 with Indonesia, an all time high, and a trade surplus of $8 billion for Indonesia.
In terms of investments, businesses from the EU invested up to $2.2 billion in 2011, making it the second-largest source of foreign investment into Indonesia. EU companies also employ over 500,000 employees in Indonesia.
“It is time to start the negotiation. From our perspective, trade negotiation typically takes a couple of years but this negotiation could go relatively quickly,¿ O’Sullivan said.
Based on policy recommendations from a joint study team, the CEPA would cover improvements in market access, capacity building and facilitation of trade and investment. On trade, the agreement would implement gradual tariff reduction within a period of nine years, eliminating 95 per cent of tariffs and possibly even the remaining 5 per cent.
The capacity-building program would include a permanent forum for business-to-business and business-to-government technical dialogue and joint financing for programs. CEPA would also cover standard protocols for joint cooperation in infrastructure development under the so-called private-partnership framework.
House of Representatives’ trade commission chairman Airlangga Hartarto said that the multitude of issues being discussed meant the agreement could potentially provide many beneficial opportunities for both regions.
“This is not a Free Trade Area (FTA) agreement but will be more comprehensive. The issues being discussed include trading, investment and capacity-building. These issues make this agreement different from the FTA, which only aims at eliminating levies,¿ Airlangga said.
Indonesian Employers’ Association (Apindo) chairman Sofjan Wanandi said that he expected EU investment to provide benefits to small- and medium-scale enterprises (SMEs), a sector on which Indonesia relied heavily for growth.
“I believe this [agreement] will benefit both sides and we must also involve SMEs in our future investment plans. We are going to promote this agreement throughout the essential business regions in the country,¿ Sofjan said.
“Now that the negotiation is underway, we need to promote this agreement to the public so that they can give us their input. This [negotiation] will take time and therefore Indonesia must play the main role in ensuring the discussions go in line with our interests,¿ he added.
Indonesian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (Kadin) deputy chairman for international trade Emirsyah Satar said that establishing a comprehensive partnership with the EU was important because there was still a lot of untapped potential.
“We rank only at number 23 in the world in imports to the EU. On the other hand, the EU is the fourth-largest exporter into Indonesia. So, there is still a lot of room for business growth,¿ Emirsyah said.
COPYRIGHT: ASIA NEWS NETWORK

Read Yahoo! News on your mobile. Click here!

Banks to grab share of ECB’s €500bn loans

The European Central Bank is set to flood banking markets with €500bn (£424bn) of cheap loans this week, taking its financial support of the European Union to €1trn in just three months.

On Wednesday, the ECB will hold its second allotment of three-year loans to private banks and other institutions, known as the longer-term refinancing operations (LTRO). Analysts are expecting banks to apply for between €200bn and €750bn in total, with most forecasts around the €500bn mark.
In December, 523 banks borrowed €489bn from the first LTRO. The loans carried an interest rate of around 1 per cent a year. The new loans will be just as cheap, but the collateral requirements have been loosened. Banks will be able to pledge corporate and consumer loans, rather than just government bonds, in return for the borrowing.
The new LTRO will be conducted through national central banks, not the ECB, so governments will take the losses should their banks be unable to repay the loans.
The first unprecedented provision of liquidity has been credited by the ECB president, Mario Draghi, with helping Europe to avoid a banking crisis this year. Some banks had found it increasingly difficult to borrow in the second half of last year. These institutions used the ECB’s cheap funds to meet their liabilities.
The liquidity injection also seems to have helped bring down the borrowing costs of some distressed eurozone states, as banks, particularly in Spain and Italy, have used the money to invest in bonds issued by their governments. Italian 10-year yields have come down from above 7 per cent to 5.5 per cent. Spanish 10-year yields have fallen from 5.7 to 5 per cent.
Sony Kapoor of the Re-Define think tank said: “The bigger the LTRO next week, the more the short-term relief for the banking sector, but at the cost of making a sustainable exit from life-support even harder.”
Jens Larsen of RBC Capital Markets, argued that the LTRO would be beneficial as long as banks restructure. “If the euro banks spend the time wisely by reducing their balance sheets and raising the necessary capital that’s not so bad,” he said. “But if they’re not doing that, it’s dangerous.”

http://tourism9.com/    http://vkins.com/

Data wars: Return of the performance debate

Data wars: Return of the performance debate

Chris Higson, a professor in accounting at the Coller Institute of Private Equity at London Business School, and Rüdiger Stucke, a professor at the University of Oxford, last week published a report entitled ‘The Performance of Private Equity,’ in which they reiterated concerns first made by Stucke in December about the quality of Thomson Reuters’ data on a sample of US private equity funds.
Higson and Stucke claimed that in 2010, performance data for more than 40% of the private equity funds in a Thomson Reuters sample of US funds raised between 1980 and 2005 was out of date. They added that incomplete data on these funds had led to a downward bias, therefore making it easier for many funds to claim they outperform the index.
Higson said: “It turns out the [Thomson Reuters] data is wrong, significantly biased. As far as we can tell it’s that whoever was looking after the data simply didn’t update it.”
But Leon Saunders Calvert, head of global deals and private equity at Thomson Reuters, told Financial News this week : “We have already emphasised those claims are not substantiated and not valid. Coller appear to have taken the opportunity to highlight suggested problems which are unsupported by our data.”
He added that Coller had not “contacted us or spoken to us” and that Thomson Reuters continues to discuss its data with private equity firms to ensure it can “reflect their market accurately”.
Higson said in the report last week: “The performance is measured in terms of net asset values. Because there are so many incomplete records in Thomson Reuters’ [data], those net asset values got frozen and significantly understated the performance of the funds.”
Calvert said there had been no errors in its system and the incomplete data was as a result of its researchers being unable to obtain the latest cash flows of some funds. He said Thomson Reuters had criteria for what defined a so-called “stale fund” so they could be stripped out and its research currently included no funds it deemed to be stale. He added the company’s clients were aware the data’s methodology included some funds with incomplete data.
He declined to disclose the number of researchers responsible for updating the company’s system on the grounds that the information was commercially sensitive.
He added that because Thomson Reuters had not supplied Higson and Stucke with the underlying cash flows of the funds in its sample because they were confidential, “to come to some of their conclusions, which we know are wrong, they have to have made a number of assumptions about the data”.
The comment highlights the continuing debate in the buyout industry over the credibility of performance and valuation figures. Last week, members of the private equity industry criticised valuation methods following news that US regulator the Securities and Exchange Commission had launched an informal inquiry into how valuations are calculated.
In May, trade body the European Private Equity and Venture Capital Association for the first time made its complete market research publicly available as it attempts to improve its transparency and the credibility of its data.
–write to jennifer.bollen@dowjones.com
http://tourism9.com/    http://vkins.com/

Tangled in diplomacy, EU struggles to frame new financial rules

BRUSSELS (Reuters) – When it takes six hours to draft a single sentence in a 100-page document, you know things are moving slowly.
In meeting rooms of embassies across Brussels, diplomats are haggling over the finer details of dozens of reforms more than four years after the financial crisis that devastated European banks and triggered the euro zone’s struggle with debt.
While the United States agreed in 2010 an initial framework to prevent financiers taking the kind of risks that sparked the deepest global recession since the 1930s, the European Union‘s response is often tangled in backroom diplomacy.
“Bailout is a naughty word these days but we haven’t created a system to deal with failing banks without one,” said a diplomat from a northern European country who is working on around 15 different EU dossiers to regulate finance. “We are still spending hours arguing over the wording of a sentence.”
The crisis revealed how regulators and even top bank executives on both sides of the Atlantic failed to grasp the risks in the complex financial architecture they helped build.
But agreeing new laws among the bloc’s 27 member countries and the European Parliament is becoming so burdensome that diplomats worry Europe‘s defenses will not be in place should a new crisis hit.
German lender IKB was the first casualty of the financial crash in mid-2007, imploding after pursuing what one banker described as an “all you can eat” strategy, snapping up U.S. subprime mortgage debt.
By the time the worst of the crisis was over in Europe, more than 50 lenders had to be rescued by their governments.
The EU responded with rules governing hedge funds and banker pay. But it has yet to outline a framework law for dealing with banks threatened with collapse, a reform many analysts believe is central in ensuring that bank bondholders – and not the taxpayer – pay to rescue banks in future.
The delicate state of Europe’s banks, which have been faced with the possibility of a chaotic Greek debt default, is partly to blame.
Banks still have trillions of euros of risky loans on their books, and it has taken the near-unlimited offer of funds from the European Central Bank to prevent another credit freeze.
LEEWAY OR LIMIT?
Michel Barnier, the former French foreign minister given the task of leading an overhaul of EU financial regulation two years ago, is due to present his bank salvage plan sometime this year.
But even when he does, the proposed legislation could take three years to become law.
“We can’t afford any more delays,” Olle Schmidt, a liberal who is leading financial reform efforts in the European parliament. “If Europe is to be able to react swiftly to another crisis, these defenses must be in place.”
Diplomats have also clashed over proposed rules governing the amount of capital banks must keep in reserve to cover the risks of lending. This is crucial in preventing another credit boom of the kind that led to the financial crash.
Britain wants more leeway to impose stricter standards on capital than the EU, while France wants the limit capped, reflecting the different way the crisis affected the two neighboring countries.
“The French banking system did OK, albeit with public support, whereas British banks took some serious hits,” said Sony Kapoor, founder of think tank Re-Define.
Overhauling banking is just one of the dossiers keeping diplomats up late at night in the glass and steel buildings of Brussels’s European quarter – working in tandem with colleagues in their home capitals.
While EU leaders have held 17 summits over the past two years to resolve the sovereign debt debacle, diplomats are sifting their way through proposals for regulating derivatives, trading, insider dealing, credit rating agencies and banker pay.
And with most working groups held in English, non-native speakers often struggle to grasp the highly technical issues.
One official recalled an embarrassing misunderstanding, when an ambassador appeared to describe a discussion on hedge funds as being “like a short shit in a long bath.” Participants later concluded he meant “a short sheet on a long bed.”
“Sometimes you understand the words but you don’t understand the meaning,” said one eastern European diplomat.
The final legal text is often as mystifying as the process that created it. “They are unreadable,” said Eddy Wymeersch, a former regulator, commenting on hedge fund rules. “It is just page after page of legalese.”
Bruce Stokes, an analyst with think tank the German Marshall Fund, believes Washington works faster because directly elected members of Congress and not bureaucrats draft legislation. “Brussels is not that accountable,” he said.
Washington drew up the Dodd-Frank act in 2010, a framework for financial reform that includes sweeping changes including bans on banks trading on their own account.
Fleshing out the full detail of these rules will, however, require further work and the European Commission points to its success in moving earlier on banker pay and bank capital.
In Europe, much of the responsibility for rewriting the rulebook for finance falls to the Commission, proposing and writing the first draft of laws that are then sent to European countries and the bloc’s parliament for approval.
“The European legislative system is designed far more for incremental adjustment than for major reform,” said Nicolas Veron, an expert in financial policy who works in both Washington and Brussels. “It’s more bureaucratically driven, but that doesn’t mean that the outcome is not political.”
With things moving so slowly, those working on the dossiers say the new regulations are in danger of being overtaken by events.
“I’ll be retired by the time all of this is done,” said one banker, whose job it is to predict the direction of legislation. “It’s not the kind of work I’d recommend.”
(Writing by Robin Emmott; additional reporting by Claire Davenport, editing by Mike Peacock)

http://tourism9.com    http://vkins.com

nScaled Announces Series A Investment by Almaz Capital and Doughty Hanson Technology Ventures

SAN FRANCISCO, CA–(Marketwire -02/22/12)- nScaled, a pioneering provider of cloud-based Recovery-as-a-Service (RaaS) solutions, today announced that it has completed a Series A round of financing, securing $7 million in investments from Almaz Capital and Doughty Hanson Technology Ventures, as well as leading Silicon Valley angel investors. The investment will be used to fund nScaled’s growth, including expansion of its global network of data centers and new software development, as well as sales and marketing efforts.
Peter Loukianoff, co-founder and managing partner of Almaz Capital, said, “In nScaled, we found a company that is in prime position to command a dominant role in the emerging market of cloud-based disaster recovery. nScaled’s technology platform will enable the company to broaden its service offerings in the future and allow customers to take full advantage of the cloud and its enormous economic and operational benefits. Cloud-computing is forcing dramatic structural changes in the way software applications are consumed by companies of all sizes and nScaled is well-positioned to capitalize on this tectonic market shift.”
“We invested in nScaled because we believe there is a gap in the market for technology that simplifies and reduces the cost of providing disaster recovery,” added George Powlick, managing director at Doughty Hanson Technology Ventures. “nScaled’s early success and the market’s acceptance of Cloud-based recovery services make us confident that nScaled will become a leader in the market.”
“2011 was a stellar year for nScaled. We tripled the size of our business by virtually all measures and we have similarly aggressive growth plans for 2012,” said Mark Hadfield, CEO of nScaled. “This funding will help us achieve that growth and position us as one of the dominant players in Recovery-as-a-Service.”
As part of its growth strategy, nScaled recently announced the availability of free accounts designed to provide prospective customers with a fast and easy way to discover Cloud-based disaster recovery, backup and archiving capabilities for their VMware data centers.
About Almaz CapitalAlmaz Capital is one of the leading venture capital firms serving entrepreneurs and companies with ties to Russia and the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS). Investors and strategic partners of the firm include industry leaders, such as Cisco, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (the “EBRD”), and UFG Asset Management. Almaz Capital primarily targets early and expansion stage investments in high growth sectors, including Technology, Digital Media, and Communications. In addition to extensive experience in Russia and the CIS, the firm’s network in Silicon Valley offers portfolio companies an effective local investment partner with global reach. For more information please go to http://www.almazcapital.com/
About Doughty Hanson Technology VenturesDoughty Hanson Technology Ventures invests in exceptional entrepreneurs and management teams that have the passion, commitment and vision to conceive great ideas and build global businesses. Their investment strategy targets companies that develop sophisticated and proprietary technologies and focuses on three industry sectors: internet software, mobile communications and clean energy technology. For more information please go to http://www.doughtyhanson.com/
About nScaled Inc.nScaled provides Recovery-as-a-Service (RaaS) to mid-size companies worldwide. They provide an all-in-one solution for disaster recovery, business continuity, backup and archiving to customers with zero tolerance for data loss or downtime. nScaled’s customers are banks, law firms, hospitals, manufacturers, retailers, universities — any organization that needs to be ready for the inevitable problems that lead to data or server loss. All services are based on a global network of remote cloud data centers plus on-premises local cloud appliance, all managed as one secure, seamless infrastructure. The company is headquartered in San Francisco, with offices in London. For more information, please visit http://www.nscaled.com or write to info@nscaled.com.
http://tourism9.com    http://vkins.com

Saxo Bank Executes World's First Base Jumping FX Trade

HELLERUP, Denmark, February 20, 2012 /PRNewswire/ –
Saxo Bank, the online trading and investment specialist, has successfully executed, what is believed to be the first FX trade ever during a base jump at terminal velocity.
The spectacular trade was placed and confirmed during a free fall using the new SaxoTrader for iPhone® & Android app.
Swedish wing suit jumper and stuntman Martin Rosén used the app whilst performing the jump in Hutchinson Peak in the Hottentot Hollands Mountain Range outside of Cape Town, South Africa. The stunt base jumper bought 1,000,000 EURUSD Spot at a price of 1.26969 and the trade was confirmed when he was still in mid-air.
Footage from the jump has formed a high-energy television advertisement for Saxo Bank’s platform and trading applications. The campaign will be launched on 20 February and aired on Bloomberg, CNBC and other networks.
A 10 minute behind-the-scenes film will be available shortly. However, the crew also filmed a four minute documentary of the event available here: http://www.saxobank.com/mobile/saxotrader-anytime-anywhere
Torben Rene Larsen, Head of Commercial Marketing, Saxo Bank, commented: “We like breaking new ground and to set new industry standards but we also think there is a strong similarity between the mentality of base jumpers and traders. Both need to be in complete control, and both share the absolute confidence in their ability and demand the same from their equipment. The base jump trade has proved that our applications allow the user to trade in virtually all situations, anytime and anywhere, and provide the technology required to execute a trade in full confidence.”
“Much of Saxo Bank’s development has been driven by the need to differentiate ourselves as a bank specialising in trading and investments with a clear customer focus. The fact that Saxo Bank cornered the online market early on was a big advantage and helped spur the Bank’s growth. We still like to differentiate ourselves from our competitors, and this first FX trade at terminal velocity proves that we are still breaking new ground.”
About Saxo Bank
Saxo Bank is a leading online trading and investment specialist. A fully licensed and regulated European bank, Saxo Bank enables private investors and institutional clients to trade FX, CFDs, ETFs, Stocks, Futures, Options and other derivatives via three specialised and fully integrated trading platforms; the browser-based SaxoWebTrader, the downloadable SaxoTrader and the SaxoMobileTrader application available in over 20 languages. Saxo Bank also offers professional portfolio and fund management through Saxo Asset Management who accommodates high-net worth private clients and institutional investors and provides banking services and advice to retail clients through Saxo Privatbank. The Saxo Bank Group is headquartered in Copenhagen with offices throughout Europe, Asia, Middle East, Latin America and Australia.http://tourism9.com/    http://vkins.com/

Icelandic Anger Brings Debt Forgiveness in Best Recovery Story

February 20, 2012, 2:31 AM EST
By Omar R. Valdimarsson
Feb. 20 (Bloomberg) — Icelanders who pelted parliament with rocks in 2009 demanding their leaders and bankers answer for the country’s economic and financial collapse are reaping the benefits of their anger.
Since the end of 2008, the island’s banks have forgiven loans equivalent to 13 percent of gross domestic product, easing the debt burdens of more than a quarter of the population, according to a report published this month by the Icelandic Financial Services Association.
“You could safely say that Iceland holds the world record in household debt relief,” said Lars Christensen, chief emerging markets economist at Danske Bank A/S in Copenhagen. “Iceland followed the textbook example of what is required in a crisis. Any economist would agree with that.”
The island’s steps to resurrect itself since 2008, when its banks defaulted on $85 billion, are proving effective. Iceland’s economy will this year outgrow the euro area and the developed world on average, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development estimates. It costs about the same to insure against an Icelandic default as it does to guard against a credit event in Belgium. Most polls now show Icelanders don’t want to join the European Union, where the debt crisis is in its third year.
The island’s households were helped by an agreement between the government and the banks, which are still partly controlled by the state, to forgive debt exceeding 110 percent of home values. On top of that, a Supreme Court ruling in June 2010 found loans indexed to foreign currencies were illegal, meaning households no longer need to cover krona losses.
Crisis Lessons
“The lesson to be learned from Iceland’s crisis is that if other countries think it’s necessary to write down debts, they should look at how successful the 110 percent agreement was here,” said Thorolfur Matthiasson, an economics professor at the University of Iceland in Reykjavik, in an interview. “It’s the broadest agreement that’s been undertaken.”
Without the relief, homeowners would have buckled under the weight of their loans after the ratio of debt to incomes surged to 240 percent in 2008, Matthiasson said.
Iceland’s $13 billion economy, which shrank 6.7 percent in 2009, grew 2.9 percent last year and will expand 2.4 percent this year and next, the Paris-based OECD estimates. The euro area will grow 0.2 percent this year and the OECD area will expand 1.6 percent, according to November estimates.
Housing, measured as a subcomponent in the consumer price index, is now only about 3 percent below values in September 2008, just before the collapse. Fitch Ratings last week raised Iceland to investment grade, with a stable outlook, and said the island’s “unorthodox crisis policy response has succeeded.”
People Vs Markets
Iceland’s approach to dealing with the meltdown has put the needs of its population ahead of the markets at every turn.
Once it became clear back in October 2008 that the island’s banks were beyond saving, the government stepped in, ring-fenced the domestic accounts, and left international creditors in the lurch. The central bank imposed capital controls to halt the ensuing sell-off of the krona and new state-controlled banks were created from the remnants of the lenders that failed.
Activists say the banks should go even further in their debt relief. Andrea J. Olafsdottir, chairman of the Icelandic Homes Coalition, said she doubts the numbers provided by the banks are reliable.
“There are indications that some of the financial institutions in question haven’t lost a penny with the measures that they’ve undertaken,” she said.
Fresh Demands
According to Kristjan Kristjansson, a spokesman for Landsbankinn hf, the amount written off by the banks is probably larger than the 196.4 billion kronur ($1.6 billion) that the Financial Services Association estimates, since that figure only includes debt relief required by the courts or the government.
“There are still a lot of people facing difficulties; at the same time there are a lot of people doing fine,” Kristjansson said. “It’s nearly impossible to say when enough is enough; alongside every measure that is taken, there are fresh demands for further action.”
As a precursor to the global Occupy Wall Street movement and austerity protests across Europe, Icelanders took to the streets after the economic collapse in 2008. Protests escalated in early 2009, forcing police to use teargas to disperse crowds throwing rocks at parliament and the offices of then Prime Minister Geir Haarde. Parliament is still deciding whether to press ahead with an indictment that was brought against him in September 2009 for his role in the crisis.
A new coalition, led by Social Democrat Prime Minister Johanna Sigurdardottir, was voted into office in early 2009. The authorities are now investigating most of the main protagonists of the banking meltdown.
Legal Aftermath
Iceland’s special prosecutor has said it may indict as many as 90 people, while more than 200, including the former chief executives at the three biggest banks, face criminal charges.
Larus Welding, the former CEO of Glitnir Bank hf, once Iceland’s second biggest, was indicted in December for granting illegal loans and is now waiting to stand trial. The former CEO of Landsbanki Islands hf, Sigurjon Arnason, has endured stints of solitary confinement as his criminal investigation continues.
That compares with the U.S., where no top bank executives have faced criminal prosecution for their roles in the subprime mortgage meltdown. The Securities and Exchange Commission said last year it had sanctioned 39 senior officers for conduct related to the housing market meltdown.
The U.S. subprime crisis sent home prices plunging 33 percent from a 2006 peak. While households there don’t face the same degree of debt relief as that pushed through in Iceland, President Barack Obama this month proposed plans to expand loan modifications, including some principal reductions.
According to Christensen at Danske Bank, “the bottom line is that if households are insolvent, then the banks just have to go along with it, regardless of the interests of the banks.”
–Editors: Jonas Bergman, Tasneem Brogger.
To contact the reporter on this story: Omar R. Valdimarsson in Reykjavik valdimarsson@bloomberg.net.
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Jonas Bergman at jbergman@bloomberg.nethttp://tourism9.com/    http://vkins.com/

Decision day for second Greek bailout despite financing gaps

BRUSSELS (Reuters) – Euro zone finance ministers are expected to approve a second bailout for Greece on Monday to try to draw a line under months of uncertainty that has shaken the currency bloc, although there is work to be done to make the figures add up.
Diplomats and economists say they do not expect the package to resolve Greece’s economic problems. That could take a decade or more, a bleak prospect that brought thousands of Greeks onto the streets to protest austerity measures again on Sunday.
The ministers need to agree new measures to square the numbers, given the ever-worsening state of the Greek economy. But they say an agreement on Monday will help restructure the country’s vast debts, put it on a more stable financial footing and keep it inside the 17-country single currency zone.
Senior officials from euro zone finance ministries and the European Central Bank held a conference call on Sunday to go over the final details of the 130-billion-euro ($171-billion)program, including a debt sustainability analysis critical to the International Monetary Fund.
While there is skepticism in Germany and other countries that Greece will be able to live up to its commitments – including implementing 3.3 billion euros of spending cuts and tax increases – officials said momentum was building for approval of the deal.
French Finance Minister Francois Baroin said all the elements were in place to reach an agreement.
“It cannot wait any longer … Greece has debt payments in March and could find itself in bankruptcy, something which France has been trying to avoid for the last 18 months,” he told Europe 1 radio on Monday.
Finnish Finance Minister Jutta Urpilainen said Greece had done all that had been asked of it.
“There are many open details … A big issue is that we have to get Greece’s debt on a level that is sustainable and enables Greece to survive,” she told reporters in Helsinki.
A euro zone official in contact with junior ministers involved in the Sunday conference call said the financing gaps were not so large that they risked derailing the whole process.
“I don’t see anybody wanting to be responsible for pulling the plug on the deal at this late stage,” he said.
“The gut feeling is that this is going to go through – everyone feels the pressure this time to deliver,” he said, indicating that the Netherlands, Finland and Germany, which have been the most critical of Athens’ ability to commit, looked likely to come on board if the financing gaps could be closed.
GREEK ANGER UNABATED
Several thousand Greeks demonstrated on Sunday against the austerity measures to reduce the country’s debt, although the numbers were much lower than earlier protests.
Greek Prime Minister Lucas Papademos flew to Brussels for last-minute preparations as about 3,000 demonstrators massed on the capital’s central Syntagma square.
Riot police shielded the national assembly to prevent a repeat of riots a week ago when masked youths torched buildings and looted shops across Athens.
Under one crucial element of the deal, Greece will have around 100 billion euros of debt written off via a restructuring involving private-sector holders of Greek government bonds.
Banks and insurers will swap bonds they hold for longer-dated securities that pay a lower coupon, resulting in a real 70 percent reduction in the value of the assets.
The bond exchange is expected to launch on March 8 and complete three days later, Athens said on Saturday. That means a 14.5-billion-euro bond repayment due on March 20 would be restructured, allowing Greece to avoid default.
The vast majority of the funds in the 130-billion-euro program will be used to finance the bond swap and to ensure that Greece’s banking system remains stable: 30 billion euros will go to “sweeteners” to get the private sector to sign up to the swap, 23 billion will go to recapitalize Greek banks.
A further 35 billion will allow Greece to finance the buying back of the bonds, and 5.7 billion will go to paying off the interest accrued on the bonds being traded in.
The overall objective is to reduce Greece’s debts from 160 percent of GDP to around 120 percent by 2020 – the figure and timeframe that the IMF, ECB and the European Commission, together known as the troika, have established as sustainable.
MEETING THE TARGET
The focus of Monday’s finance ministers’ meeting will be what “around 120 percent” means in practice.
A debt sustainability report delivered to euro zone finance ministers last week showed that under the main scenario, Greek debt will only fall to 129 percent by 2020.
The IMF has said if the ratio cannot be cut to around 120 percent, it may not be able to help finance the Greek program.
U.S. Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner urged the International Monetary Fund to support the program.
“This is a very strong and very difficult package of reforms, deserving of support of the international community and the IMF,” Geithner said in a statement on Sunday.
As well as working to get the number down, there are moves to convince members of the troika that a debt level of 123-125 percent in 2020 would be sustainable.
“If we can get it down to 123 or 124 percent, I think everyone’s going to be okay with that,” the euro zone official said after the Sunday conference call. “Everyone will find a way to tweak the numbers.”
A number of measures, including restructuring the accrued interest portion or reducing the “sweeteners,” are being considered to move the figure closer to 120, a euro zone official familiar with the negotiations said.
There are also discussions about marginally lowering the interest rate on 110 billion euros of bilateral loans already made to Greece in May 2010 – the first package of support – to lighten the financing burden on Athens.
Central banks could help too.
The ECB is weighing up whether to allow Greek bonds held in euro zone central banks’ investment portfolios to be subject to the same writedowns private investors are set to take, central bank sources told Reuters on Friday.
The central banks hold around 20 billion euros of Greek bonds in their traditional investment portfolios and the ECB holds about double that amount from its emergency bond-buying program. It has also signaled it could forego the profits made on the latter at some point.
If the finance ministers do succeed in reaching an agreement, it will provide immediate relief to Athens and financial markets, which have been kept guessing since the bailout package was announced last October.
But no one is pretending it will end Greece’s problems. Figures last week showed its economy shrank 7 percent year-on-year in the last quarter of 2011, much more than expected, with further cuts likely to make matters worse.
The troika, responsible for monitoring Greece’s reform progress, carries out quarterly reviews, while the European Commission will soon have dozens more monitors on the ground.
Already there is concern that at any one of those reviews of the new program – if it is approved on Monday – Greece will be found to be behind, especially if GDP continues to slump.
That will again raise the threat the country will have to default if it cannot meet its obligations, and invite questions about its ability to remain in the euro zone.
($1 = 0.7597 euros)
(Additional reporting by Daniel Flynn in Paris, Terri Kinnunen in Helsinki and George Georgiopoulos in Athens; writing by Mike Peacock; editing by Elizabeth Piper)http://tourism9.com/    http://vkins.com/