显示标签为“student-loans”的博文。显示所有博文
显示标签为“student-loans”的博文。显示所有博文

2012年2月25日星期六

The burden of student debt

At the height of the Occupy protests last fall, young people held signs announcing how much they owed in student loans. While the pundits were asking each other what, exactly, the protesters wanted, a big part of the answer was on those signs: Students are leaving colleges and universities with a staggering financial burden and bleak job prospects.
“When you get out of college at 21 with a 30-year loan, it’s soul crushing,” says Scot Ross, executive director of One Wisconsin Now, a progressive organization that is launching an advocacy campaign on the issue. Ross is on leave to serve as communications director for gubernatorial candidate Kathleen Falk.
The student loan landscape has shifted dramatically since the parents of current students and recent graduates left college. In 2006, the U.S. Education Department’s National Center for Education Statistics reported that most borrowers who finished college in the early 1990s were able to manage their student loan burden. Most paid the loans back in 10 years. Today, many students face 20 to 25 years of making payments. In the early ’90s, about half of students borrowed; in 2006, two-thirds had to borrow. And their loans are much bigger.
Federal and state policy and budgetary decisions in recent years have contributed to the student debt burden. Public funding for public universities has fallen steeply at the same time that tuition has skyrocketed. Congress slashed funding for Pell Grants that helped the most needy students and put provisions in place to protect private lenders.
Federally funded student loans are no longer available from Sallie Mae, and its private loans have much higher interest rates than do home or car loans.
Last year, students borrowed more than $100 billion dollars — a new record. The College Board, an advocacy group that works to ensure that every student has the opportunity to prepare for, enroll in and graduate from college, reports that students are borrowing twice as much as in 2001. The total amount owed on all outstanding student loans is expected to reach $1 trillion next year. A full-time undergraduate student borrowed an average of almost $5,000 in 2010, 63% more than a decade earlier after adjusting for inflation, according to the College Board.
These young debtors are not just those who opted to attend prestigious private universities. Tuition at public universities has soared as those institutions struggle to offset cuts in public funding. University of Wisconsin-Madison’s in-state tuition jumped from $5,866 in 2005 to $9,672 in 2011. The estimated total cost for a year at UW-Madison was $15,256 in 2005. Now it’s $25,421.
About half of 2010-2011 bachelor’s degree recipients at UW-Madison will have borrowed an average total of $24,493, says Susan Fischer, director of the office of Student Financial Aid. For those who go on to graduate school, the debts increase sharply. About three-quarters of law school graduates will have loans and owe an average $99,723. Almost 90% of medical school graduates will have borrowed, and their average debt will be $151,383.
To make matters worse, student loans differ from all other kinds of debt in two significant ways. They are excluded from bankruptcy protection, and it is not possible to refinance or restructure loans to take advantage of falling interest rates.
“It is easier to be a deadbeat dad than it is to lose your student loan debt,” Ross says of the lack of bankruptcy protection. “What does that say about us as a nation?”
People on disability who can’t afford to pay their student loans can even have their payments garnisheed, Ross notes. The only recourse, he adds, is “loan rehabilitation, which means you have to agree to make extended payments and take a new loan, with added fees. You end up with even more debt.”
Ross admits he has a dog in this fight. He borrowed about $30,000 in 11 different loans to pay for his bachelor’s and master’s degrees. He laughs, a little ruefully, when he admits that, at 42, he is in “year 12 of a 30-year student debt,” and says he’s fortunate to have a job and be able to keep up with the payments.
Ben Manski, founder of the Liberty Tree Foundation, is another advocate for reforms to the student loan system. He contends that the huge increases in student debt are the inevitable result of cuts to higher education in state budgets.
“Generation X was the first generation to experience the impact of debt and a restructured job market,” says Manski, 37, who was recently appointed campaign director for Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein. “We are overemployed and overworked. We do not have job security. Retirement is not even a consideration. The Millennials have it even worse, because of high unemployment. When you have this kind of debt, you lose freedoms — the freedom to engage in public service, for example, or pursue the career you are most fitted for as opposed to one that will make ends meet.”
Despite the heart-stopping debt statistics, the UW’s Fisher thinks it’s still possible to get at least an undergraduate degree without going very deeply into debt.
“Sometimes, students accrue big debt because they change majors and take longer to graduate. Or they choose a private or out-of-state public school that the family really cannot afford. My advice to incoming students is to work while they are in school and live frugally. And get in and get out. If they do that, I think they can finish with a minimal amount of debt.”
But starting working life owing tens of thousands of dollars during a period of high unemployment has many students wondering how they will be able to afford to marry, have children or buy a house. Paying off even a relatively small loan in a sagging economy is proving very difficult for many people. Here are some of their stories.
‘You can’t live your life without worrying’
Christina Spector left UW-Madison with an undergraduate degree in elementary education and psychology (2002), a graduate degree in educational leadership and policy analysis (2008) and a law degree (also 2008).
“It was a conscious decision to go to UW-Madison for the in-state tuition. I had scholarships, a little help from my parents, and I always had jobs while I was in school,” she says. But it wasn’t enough.
“The first time I signed a promissory note, I had such a hard time of it. I cried for two days about entering that system, but I had no other choice.”
A school administration consultant for the State Department of Instruction, Spector will pay $550 a month for a total of 25 years before her loans are paid off. Her husband, who has a master’s degree and is employed by the American Federation of Teachers, makes student loan payments of $200 a month.
That $750 monthly expense means they must live very frugally.
“We are on a really strict budget,” she says. “We don’t make large purchases unless we absolutely have to. We bought much less house than we qualified for, and we drive an inexpensive car. We are thoughtful about little things like buying coffee. We take our lunch to work. We can’t travel, so we use our vacations to visit family.”
One place where the family does not cut corners is on daycare for their 2-year-old child.
“Daycare costs more than our mortgage, but that’s one thing you’re not going to scrimp on.”
The debt drives all the family’s decisions — having another child, making a career change, moving.
“It’s difficult sometimes, because you can’t live your life without worrying about it,” she says. “I am much less inclined to take any kind of risk because of it.”
Spector knows she could ease the financial burden by abandoning a job she loves in the public sector and joining a private law firm.
“I never went to law school wanting that. I always wanted to work in the public sector. I have friends from law school who have made that decision so they could pay off their loans. To me, it seems like selling your soul. I just couldn’t do it. That would be a true prison on top of the bondage of the loans.”
‘We have given up many things’
A Madison West high school graduate, Ben Manski has an undergraduate degree in sociology and a law degree from UW-Madison. His higher education left him with $70,000 in student loan debt. His wife, Sarah, also has debt for her student loans.
“I am paying about $500 a month. For both my wife and me, it’s about $800 a month. It’s a major part of our budget, almost as much as we pay for housing,” he says.
Although Manski could be earning big bucks in a private law firm, he has stayed true to his commitment to use his education to work for social change. Founder of the Liberty Tree Foundation, he ran for the state Legislature as a Green Party candidate in 2010. He also practices a little law and teaches sociology at Madison College.
“I had other choices I could have made,” Manski says. “I was offered a lobbying job for an insurance company when I was 22 years old that would have paid $80,000 a year. I turned it down.”
Manski and his wife have had to make difficult choices because of their student loans.
“It is very difficult to save, and we have given up many things. We are not in a position where we can help others financially. And, certainly, we are not having a family until we have the ability to afford kids,” he says. He and his wife recently started a new website, posipair.com, designed to put environmentally responsible businesses in touch with each other and with customers, in an effort to generate some independent income.
Manski, who comes from a family of teachers, has a passion for education and would like to teach full time.
“I think there’s no higher calling than teaching and no more important institution than education,” he says.
Sometimes, he says, his students ask him if their schooling is worth the money and if they will be able to get jobs when they finish. “I used to be able to say it is definitely worth it,” he says. “But now that question is more difficult to answer.”
‘We can’t take vacations’
When Kathy Wallace learned that her Kenosha employer, Powerbrace Corp., might be moving its operations to Mexico, she decided to follow her dream of becoming a math teacher.
With a bachelor’s degree in math already in her pocket she would need only to complete the requirements for a teaching license. She enrolled at Carthage College, where she took night classes for four years on top of working 40 hours processing accounts payable. In 2006, she had to quit her job to student teach. She landed a job as a substitute teacher at Bullen Middle School in Kenosha and continued to work toward a master’s degree through an online Walden University program. She completed the master’s degree 20 months later, and now has a full-time teaching position.
Dream achieved.
But Wallace’s career change left her with a total of $60,000 in student loans and the prospect of supporting her family of four on a teacher’s salary and the modest disability payments her husband receives. Her loan payments are $700 a month.
“I’ve been paying the first one [for the undergraduate degree] since 2007, and I still owe about $19,000 on that one. I finished the master’s program in August and owe $30,000 for that. It will probably take at least 12 years to pay it all off.” Wallace will be 54 years old by then.
She says her husband’s disability payments cover their mortgage, but the family has to get by on her income for everything else.
“We don’t go out to eat. We can’t take vacations. Our kids don’t get to do things the other kids get to do. It’s really hard knowing you can’t do things for your own kids.”
Those children, now 11 and 16 years old, both want to go to college.
“I’ve told them I’d chip in as much as I could. I’ve encouraged them to go for scholarships. The rest will have to be student loans,” Wallace says. “My kids seeing me get more education showed them this is what you need to do to survive. Without college, there’s not much out there for you.”
Wallace hopes she may be able to take advantage of a loan forgiveness option for her federal Stafford and Perkins loans after five years of teaching. She qualifies on two counts — she teaches mathematics and she teaches in a Title 1 school. But she worries that she might not make the five-year requirement.
“If I can get [those loans forgiven] it takes a lot of pressure off me. But we are facing layoffs again in our district.”
‘The interest is very high’
Tanya Oemig finished paying off her own student loans in her early 30s, but now, at 46, she faces paying back $15,000 she borrowed to send her children to college.
“They couldn’t borrow enough themselves,” she explains, adding that, as a single parent, she was unable to save for her children’s higher education.
Until recently, Oemig was a communicable disease surveillance specialist with the Wisconsin Division of Public Health. Her salary there was not enough to pay the bills after taking on the new debt, and she had to add a second job. She finally decided she was on overload and quit both jobs to work for a software development company at a higher salary.
“I loved the work at Public Health, but I just couldn’t afford to keep doing it. I was lucky to find a good place to work, and it pays enough that I’m able to make the payments on one salary now. There are people struggling a lot more than I am.”
Still, Oemig worries about her children’s prospects. Both still live with her. One graduated from Madison Media Institute in May with an associate degree and now works at a gas station while he looks for a job related to his skills and education. The other one is still at Madison College, working toward a two-year degree in information systems administration. He has a part-time help desk job, but his hours were cut recently.
“I worry about their job prospects all the time. Currently they don’t make enough to support themselves. They can make their loan payments, but they can’t pay for car insurance or cell phones. And I worry they won’t find a job before their education is obsolete. They are both very discouraged.”
Oemig thinks the time allowed before graduates have to start repaying student loans is unrealistic, given the dismal job market.
“Even if they had a job right out of school, they would have a lot of expenses getting started. They need more than six months so they can save enough to afford an apartment and maybe a car — to get their feet on the ground.”
And she wonders why interest on student loans is so high when loans for other purposes are cheap these days. One of her sons has a Sallie Mae loan with an interest rate of 10%.
“I had good credit so I could get federal loans, but those who don’t have to go to private loans where the interest is very high.”
‘Sometimes I wonder why I’m doing this’
There was never any question in Dustin Bradley’s family that the Beloit Memorial graduate would go on to college.
“My grandparents didn’t go to college, and my father [a third grade teacher in Wauwatosa] was the first and only one to get a degree. My family always encouraged me and expected me to get more education,” he says. However, he admits that he drifted during his first couple of years at UW-Madison, struggling with the math required for the business program where he first enrolled, and finally finding his academic passion in sociology.
“I did the victory lap,” he explains of his extra fifth year as an undergraduate. He will receive his bachelor’s degree in May.
But Bradley’s accumulation of student debt is not over. He plans to enroll in a paralegal certificate program next fall. It’s a high-demand skill, and he’s sure he’ll find work. Then, after a few years of gaining experience, he wants to enroll in law school.
So far, Bradley’s debt load is only about $12,500, lower than average, because his family was able to kick in for his first few years and because he worked an average of 32 hours a week while in school. But from here on out, he’s on his own.
He’s looking at paralegal programs at technical colleges in Madison and Milwaukee and at several online programs. The private web-based programs are convenient, especially for someone who has a job, he says, but they are more expensive. Programs at the tech schools cost about $4,000 for the one-year course. The costs for online courses that have accreditation range from $7,500 to more than $10,000. Bradley expects he will have to borrow that money on the far more expensive private student loan market, but hopes he can pay most it off before he starts law school.
That is where the really big debt will start to build. According to UW-Madison statistics, the average law school graduate in 2012 will owe almost $100,000. That number includes accumulated undergraduate debt, but law school alone leaves the average borrower some $80,000 in debt.
Still, Bradley is confident that incurring the debt will be a good investment. “I think I’ll be making enough to make [the payments] manageable. But it’s hard when I look at some of my friends who got jobs right out of high school at Chrysler or GM. They have high-paying jobs but don’t have this debt. So sometimes I wonder why I’m doing this.”
Cause for hope
Many college graduates face a sobering reality: turning 50 and still not being free of student loan payments. But there are efforts under way to ease the burden. The progressive organization One Wisconsin Now is launching an advocacy campaign that proposes the following for state residents:
  • A “truth in lending” provision, similar to what’s required for a mortgage, so students understand when they take out a loan how much they will be paying back and for how long.
  • Bankruptcy protection.
  • The opportunity to refinance or consolidate student loans.
  • Provisions for forgiving student debt.
One Wisconsin Now is also creating a website that will highlight national efforts at helping students with excessive debt. U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin, for example, has introduced legislation that would treat private student loans the same as other private debt under bankruptcy. President Obama favors linking student loan repayments to income; providing debt forgiveness after 20 years; and allowing greater flexibility on interest rates.
“This is an issue that is just starting to bubble up to the surface,” says One Wisconsin Now’s deputy director, Mike Browne. “We’re in relatively early days, legislatively.”

http://tourism9.com/    http://vkins.com/

2012年2月24日星期五

A lesson on student loans

A lesson on student loans
Student Financial Education Services presents students with advice for dealing with loans.
by STUDENT FINANCIAL EDUCATION SERVICES
This article originally appeared in The Tiger on February 24, 2012 | PRINT
Understanding Your Student Loans
The majority of college students have them: student loans. Student loans have increased in popularity in recent years, mostly due to the increasing tuition rates seen across the country. As you near the end of your tenure here at Clemson, there are a few things to keep in mind that will better prepare you to deal with your student loans.
Where do I find my loans?
If you are like many students, you remember receiving the many pieces of mail over the past four years detailing your loans, but now you cannot seem to find the information. You most likely know your loans by the types of loans they are, like Stafford Loan, Perkins Loan and others. These loans are not all made by one company, but are sold off and serviced by a wide variety.
There is an easy-to-use resource to help locate all of your student loans and who they are owned or serviced by. The website to help you locate your student loans is http://www.nslds.ed.gov/nslds_SA/.
If you have private loans, such as those often made by banks or financial companies such as Discover, Citi, Bank of America or others, you may need to contact that financial institution directly, as their information is sometimes not located in the online database.
How do I pay my loans?
Once you graduate, you should be proactive about finding out when you need to start paying your student loans back.
Graduating from college can be a hectic time, and with all the address changes that you may be going through, it’s easy for mail to get misplaced or sent to the wrong address. It is the responsibility of the borrower, which would be you, to make contact with the owner or servicer of your loan(s) in order to find out when payments begin.
The owner or servicer of your loan will most likely offer you several options for repaying your loans, although not all companies offer these options, and some companies may offer more options. Here are a few basic options:
Standard Repayment: Think of this payment option as a standard loan, you make fixed payments that do not change from month to month for the standard repayment period (which is typically 10 years).
Extended Repayment: This payment option is similar to the standard payment option, except the payment period (which is the time it takes to pay back the loan) will be longer than the standard period. This type of repayment plan may be beneficial to those who have extremely large amounts of student loans and cannot afford the monthly payment under the standard repayment plan.
Graduated Repayment: A graduated repayment plan offers the advantage of allowing you to make lower monthly payments right when you get out of school with the monthly payment increasing every set period of time (such as every two or three years). This type of repayment plan is based on the ideal that your income will increase over time.
Income Dependent Repayment: This payment plan is available in certain government loan situations and allows the borrower to pay a certain percentage of their income toward the loan until the loan is paid off or until a time limit of 25 years is reached. If the time limit of 25 years is reached, the government will forgive the remaining balance on the debt, although tax implications may apply.
Although these are just a few of the standard payment options, it is important to keep your current situation in mind when determining which payment plan is right for you. It is also important to think of the payment plan in terms of which will cost you the most in interest, as opposed to those repayment plans that will accrue the least amount of interest. Students are responsible for verifying the information in this article prior to making financial decisions.
If you would like additional information on student loan payment plans or help understanding your student loan situation, please visit the Student Financial Education Office located in The Union, Office 805. You can set up an appointment by emailing us at sfes1@clemson.edu or calling us at (864) 656-7337.
Views: 32
View the discussion thread.
http://tourism9.com/    http://vkins.com/

2012年2月23日星期四

Financial aid office provides guidance for students paying off loans

If a person had $20,000 to spend, they could buy about 5,000 Javalanches, a Mini Cooper or feed 220 children in Africa for a year.  If that person is a Northwest student, though, he or she would probably use it to pay off his or her loans.  The average student debt of a Northwest graduate is between $19,825 and $22,555.  The time to begin paying off loans is quickly approaching for seniors getting ready to graduate this spring.  
 “Our students have done a great job over the years (paying off loans),” Del Morley, director of financial assistance at Northwest, said.  “The government keeps track of what they call a cohort default rate (percentage of students who default on federal loans) and our cohort default rate is always under the federal average.”
About 70 percent of Northwest students, each year, take out loans.  Subsidized loans are need based and interest begins six months after graduation.  Interest on unsubsidized loans begins immediately and payments must begin six months after a student is no longer enrolled in school.  The Northwest Office of Financial Assistance provides students in need of loans with entrance and exit counseling and gives them tools to help with loan consolidations and payment plans. 
 “There are a lot of changes in the works coming up,” Morley said.  “We’re going to try to get them all made before July 1, 2012.”
With any loans made after July 1, interest will begin to accumulate on subsidized loans as soon as a student graduates, and subsidized loans will no longer be available for graduate students.  There is also a possibility that interest rates on student loans will increase.
“Unless (Congress) passes new legislation, it will be 6.8 percent next year,” Morley said.
Kearsten Smith, a senior who has taken out loans since her freshman year, said she is confident that her education at Northwest will help her find a job that will help to pay off her loans.  If that fails, her next plan is to find someone very rich to marry. 
“If you don’t have to take (loans) out, don’t, but at the same time, student loans are the best loans you can take out,” Smith said.  “If you’re going to go to college, don’t be deterred because you have to take out loans to do it because they have the lowest interest rates (and) the best payback policy. Literally, they are the best loans you could ever take out.”
http://tourism9.com/    http://vkins.com/

2012年2月13日星期一

Student loans always are due, no matter how long overdue

By  Kathy Lynn Gray
The Columbus Dispatch Monday February 13, 2012 5:24 AM
If you think the student loan you took out years ago but never repaid won’t come back to haunt you, think again.
The debt could land you in federal court, pleading your case before a U.S. district judge.
“There’s no statute of limitations on student loans,” warned Assistant U.S. Attorney Deborah F. Sanders. “That debt is growing, and you still owe it.”
Sanders handles the student-loan default cases that come through the U.S. attorney’s office for the southern half of Ohio. Her office is pursuing about 400 cases.
“We get them because the (federal) Education Department has not been able to collect after many, many attempts,” Sanders said. “If it comes to our office, borrowers have had a lot of chances to pay.”
Defendants fall into two camps: those who don’t pay, and those who can’t, she said.
Usually the loans are years overdue, sometimes as long as 20 years. By that time, a large chunk of the money owed is interest that has accrued and compounded over the years.
In one case filed last year, the defendant owed $160,000, including nearly $25,000 in accrued interest on the 10-year-old loan. On another 10-year-old loan, nearly $40,000 of the $101,000 owed was interest.
If federal lawyers obtain a judgment against a debtor, the government can collect the money in a variety of ways. Wages and savings and checking accounts can be garnisheed, and tax refunds can be diverted, Sanders said. “We have a pretty good rate of collection.”
The court also can set up payment plans once a judgment has been made.
Unlike many other types of debt, student loans cannot be dismissed through bankruptcy except in rare situations, said Stephanie Dailey, a Columbus lawyer who specializes in bankruptcies.
“It’s almost impossible to get out of student-loan debt,” Dailey said. A debtor has to have a dire hardship, such as being completely disabled, she said.
About half the people who come to her with financial difficulties have student-loan debt, Dailey said. She advises them to approach the lender and try to get on a payment plan so that interest doesn’t continue to pile up.
“A lot of people will just stick their head in the sand and hope it’ll go away,” she said. “ Instead, they should let the creditor know they’re having trouble paying and ask for help.”
Dailey herself has nearly $100,000 in student-loan debt from law school. She has deferred her loans — postponed paying them with the blessing of the lender — when paychecks were lean. Interest continues to accrue during a deferral, but the lender won’t turn the loan over to collectors.
The number of student-loan defaults that went to federal court rose significantly in the late 1990s as the Justice Department pushed for collection. Nationwide, 1,142 default cases were filed in 1995; that number surged to 24,404 by 2000. But the number has fallen back since then as the Education Department has set up other ways to collect the debts, Sanders said.
At the same time, students are taking on more debt to attend college. In 2010, the average was $25,250, up 5 percent from the previous year, according to a study by the Project on Student Debt. The average in Ohio was $27,713. An estimated $1 trillion in total student loans is outstanding nationwide.
The default rate in 2009, the most-recent data available, was 8.8 percent. That includes borrowers with loan repayments due between Oct. 1, 2008, and Sept. 30, 2009. An estimate of the total amount of loan money in default is not available.
A survey released last week by the National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys found that 81 percent of bankruptcy lawyers said the number of potential clients with student-loan debt has increased “significantly” or “somewhat” in the past three or four years.
The association thinks that student-loan debt could create an economic threat to the country as serious as the home-mortgage crisis did in the late 2000s.
kgray@dispatch.com

http://tourism9.cm/    http://vkins.com/

College Goal Sunday

 http://tourism9.cm/    http://vkins.com/
Updated: Sunday, 12 Feb 2012, 10:13 PM EST
Published : Sunday, 12 Feb 2012, 10:13 PM EST
Fort Wayne, Ind. (WANE) – The government gives out billions of dollars for students to go to college. That even includes student loans.
Dian Suarez and his mother came to College Goal Sunday. This program is to help families fill out their Free Application for Federal Student Aid form, or FAFSA form online. Suarez is a freshman at I.P.F.W. He found out he didn’t have to take out any loans.
“I got lucky and I was able to get enough to pay for what I needed,” he said.
Many students need and rely on student loans to pay for their education. Suarez said if he’s faced with taking out a loan, he hopes to have a job waiting on him before he graduates.
“I’ll have to make sure I have a job and be able to pay it back eventually,” Suarez said.
Martin Murphy with I.P.F.W. said in this economy, finding a job isn’t so easy, which makes it harder on graduates to pay back loans.
“They’re graduating here out of college and they’re looking six to 12 months looking for a job and see, those students loans start kicking in,” Murphy said.
That’s why he stresses students should use their loans responsibly, such as on tuition and room and board, instead on a new car or new furniture for an apartment.
Murphy said it usually takes graduates between 10 to 15 years to completely pay back their loans, that’s if there’s no stop in payment. Usually, if you can’t find a job within the six month grace period or don’t make enough money to pay back your student loans, for federal loans, you can postpone payment. Sometimes, without penalty.
The deadline for completing the FAFSA form is March 10th. The deadline to make any changes to your FAFSA is May 15th.

Interest rates for common student loan could double this summer

Break’s over.
For the last five years, Congress has cut students a break on the interest rate for unsubsidized student loans, the most popular kind used at Ball State. Starting in July, if the low rate of 3.4 percent isn’t reinstated, it could go back to 6.8 percent, which represents an average $2,000 increase over the course of paying back the loan.
In 2007, the College Cost Reduction and Access Act was passed, which reduced the rate to 3.4 percent for undergraduate students. It was meant to help make college more affordable during poor economic times. Now the plan is about to expire.
“They only had a five-year plan,” said John McPherson, director of Ball State’s Scholarships and Financial Aid. “And now the only way to keep the cost low is to come up with more money to pay for it.”
Rep. Joe Courtney (R-Calif.) recently introduced a bill to keep the rate at 3.4 percent, and President Barack Obama has said he wants to keep it for at least a year.
“A college education is key to success in today’s economy,” said Courtney in a press release on his website. “But for many students, the spiraling costs of higher education are creating an immense barrier.”
For the average student using a subsidized Stafford Loan, it could means about a $2,000 increase over 10 years, according to information from the National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators.
“If you look at averages, obviously a college degree provides opportunities you can never get anywhere else,” McPherson said. “Over the life of a person, it’s not going to be huge.”
Sophomore Joseph Dimaggio uses loans and grants to pay for college, and since he decided to add a second major, he anticipates being in college an extra two and a half years. He said he’s afraid that he’ll have to spend several years paying back his loans before he can start to settle down.
“There are a lot of things I’d rather do with $2,000,” he said.
He said he wants to become an actuarial scientist, and he said it’s important to know what jobs are in demand.
“We hit such a low,” he said. “And I have a lot of friends that are older and overqualified for the job they have, especially in teaching.”
Last academic year, about 10,400 Ball State students used subsidized Stafford loans. Altogether, they borrowed $44 million.
Even if the interest rate is brought back to 6.8 percent, McPherson said this is the best deal for most students, especially if this is their first time taking out a loan. Private lenders might deny them, or give them a higher interest rate, McPherson said.
Perkins loans have a fixed 5 percent interest. But they are for extremely needy students, and not many people qualify, he said.
With a subsidized loan, the federal government absorbs the interest while a student is in college and six months afterward. If the CCRAA program is abolished, students would be responsible for the interest accumulated during the six months after they graduate.
With unsubsidized loans, students pay the interest that is built up during college and during the six-month grace period after graduation. The government uses a formula to determine a student’s need and how much money they will receive with each type of loan. The formula includes factors like income, family size, number of people already in college and the family’s assets.
Every year, two thirds of Ball State students borrow some kind of loan, McPherson said. In 2010-2011, undergrads were leaving college with an average debt of $24,121.
Rob Tyler, an adjunct professor of personal finance and the founder of Tyler Wealth Management, offered examples of how this would impact students. His estimate: not very much.
To repay the average student loan over 10 years with an interest rate of 3.4 percent, the monthly payment is about $237.59. At a rate of 6.8 percent, the monthly payment jumps to $277.79, an increase of just $40.20.
Tyler crunched a few numbers based on loan information from the Ball State Credit Union.
The interest rate for a loan from the credit union on a new car, for example, is 2.99 percent. In order to offset the extra $40.20 a student is paying back on student loans, and with the interest rate for a new car taken into consideration, they would need to buy a car that costs $2,237 less than what they had previously budgeted.
On a loan for a new house, Tyler used a 4.5 percent fixed interest rate on a 30-year mortgage for his example. In that case, to accommodate the extra $40.20 a month in student loans, he or she would want to buy a house that’s about $8,000 less than they budgeted — not a huge amount relative to a $200,000 home.
“You have to think, what’s my sacrifice?” Tyler said. “Your college education is going to last you a lifetime.”

http://tourism9.cm/    http://vkins.com/

2012年1月31日星期二

Will President Obama's Blueprint Cut College Costs?

Mark Kantrowitz is the founder of the Web sites finaid.org, and fastweb.com. He regularly answers reader questions on The Choice. Readers can post comments of their own at the end of this essay.
In his State of the Union address, President Obama announced several proposals to make college more affordable. These included doubling the number of federal work-study program jobs over five years, a one-year extension of low interest rates on certain federal student loans and a permanent extension of the American Opportunity Tax Credit. President Obama also “put colleges on notice,” telling the colleges that if they can’t stop tuition from going up, the financing they get from taxpayers each year will go down. The president also announced initiatives to help families make informed decisions concerning college costs and quality.
More money for college is better than none. As a nation, we must put a priority on increasing federal and state investment in higher education. Maintaining the status quo or making slight tweaks to student aid financing is not enough.
Yet a key concern is that increases in some student aid programs may come at the expense of cuts in other more effective student aid programs.
It is unclear how President Obama plans on paying for increases in student aid financing while Congress concentrates on cost-cutting. Congress cut $8 billion a year out of the Pell grant program last year by ending the year-round Pell grant program, which allowed students in accelerated degree programs to get two Pell grants in a single year. Congress reduced the income threshold at which a student qualifies for a full Pell grant from $32,000 to $23,000. This cuts the Pell grants by $1,100 to $1,700 for nearly 14 percent of Pell grant recipients. Additional cuts are looming on the horizon.
The tight federal budgets yield a zero-sum game, where increases in one form of federal student aid force cuts in other forms of student aid. Adding 700,000 more federal work-study jobs over five years will cost more than $1 billion a year.
But how will the Obama administration pay for a one-year extension of the 3.4 percent interest rate on subsidized Stafford loans for undergraduate students? Approximately 7.4 million students will borrow about $3,500 in subsidized Stafford loans on average, costing the federal government more than $7 billion. The permanent extension of the American Opportunity Tax Credit will add several billion dollars more a year in tax expenditures. If the Obama administration doesn’t find savings elsewhere in the budget, these spending increases will force cuts in the Pell grant program, causing declines in Bachelor’s degree attainment by low-income students. That would be a bad bargain.
The risk is that the proposals for increasing student aid financing may be little more than a shell game, where the federal government gives with one hand and takes back with the other. For example, President Obama’s proposal for a one-year delay in the doubling of interest on the subsidized Stafford loan program will be coupled with increases in interest rates on the Perkins loan program. The re-engineering of the Perkins loan program will increase the interest rate on the Perkins loan from 5 percent to 6.8 percent and transform the subsidized Perkins loan into an unsubsidized Stafford loan. (This will save students some money, by shifting borrowing from higher-cost private student loans to lower-cost federal education loans. But it still involves increasing some interest rates to reduce others). Shuffling the deck doesn’t yield a net gain if there is no improvement in college graduation rates or other public policy objectives.
If the federal government can pay for cutting the interest rates on subsidized Stafford loans in half, then why was it necessary to cut the average Pell grant? Changing the interest rates and subsidized interest benefits on student loans has no impact on college access and completion rates. In contrast, the Pell grant program enables low-income students to enroll in college and to graduate. Cutting Pell grant financing forces low-income students to borrow more, shift enrollment to lower-cost colleges or drop out of college. Increasing the interest rate is a better alternative than cutting the Pell grant.
President Obama’s proposal to provide colleges with an incentive to keep tuition affordable will have a modest impact on tuition inflation. The proposal will base a college’s allocation of federal campus-based aid on whether the college keeps net tuition affordable, limits tuition increases and helps low-income students to enroll and graduate. But the $10 billion in campus-based financing represents only about 6 percent of all federal student aid financing and the allocation formula is complicated. The prospect of losing this financing may force some colleges to increase tuition even faster to compensate for the loss of campus-based aid financing.
There are limits to the ability of colleges to control costs. The consumer inflation rate has little to do with increases in college costs. College costs are largely driven by increases in the number of faculty and staff, increases in salaries, increases in facility costs, energy costs, equipment costs and health care costs, increases in institutional financial aid financing and decreases in federal and state financing. For example, if a college has a discount rate of 37 percent, the college must increase tuition by $1.59 to net $1 in additional revenue. This contributes to college tuition increasing faster than inflation by adding a multiplier effect.
President Obama’s proposal to create a mandatory “Financial Aid Shopping Sheet” and “College Scorecard”, on the other hand, will do more to constrain increases in college costs. This standardization of college cost and financial aid disclosures will provide families with clear, correct and comparable information about the real bottom-line cost of college.
This will help them make informed decisions concerning the tradeoffs between college affordability and other factors in college choice. More families will choose high quality but lower-cost colleges, forcing colleges to cut costs while maintaining or improving quality.
Now it’s your turn, Choice readers. Tell us your opinion on the president’s proposal, or at least Mr. Kantrowitz’s analysis of it, by using the box below.
http://tourism9.com/    http://vkins.com/

2012年1月23日星期一

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau director eyes fraud

by Candice Choi – Jan. 20, 2012 07:16 PM
Associated Press
WASHINGTON – A company’s obligations don’t stop with the law. It also needs to be fair and upfront with customers.
That’s the message from Richard Cordray, who was named by President Barack Obama as the first director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
“Frankly, there’s a lot of fraud that’s committed in the marketplace that is not on its face necessarily technically illegal,” Cordray said. Such practices will now be a target for the CFPB.

The agency and Cordray’s appointment are both controversial. The CFPB was created as part of the overhaul of the nation’s financial regulations, with a mandate to police the array of financial products marketed to consumers.
Republicans blocked Cordray’s appointment for months, saying the agency would have far too much power with too little accountability. Then, earlier this month, Obama installed Cordray when Congress wasn’t in session.
On Thursday, the agency released a field guide for its examiners to analyze practices at payday lenders, which essentially offer customers advances on their paychecks for a flat fee. It will mark the first time the industry will be subject to such oversight.
The CFPB has started collecting public comment to help simplify the disclosures consumers receive with credit cards, mortgages and student financial aid. It will take months or even years before consumers see how these efforts play out.
But here’s what Cordray had to say about how the agency will impact consumers:
Question: A major focus for the CFPB has been on improving the transparency of a product’s fees and terms, and the disclosures consumers receive. Are there instances where this won’t be enough and more aggressive regulatory action will be required?
Answer: Let me answer that question in two parts.
On transparency and disclosure, a key insight here is that more disclosures don’t always make things better. As it accumulates, there can be so much dense fine print that it can actually make things much worse — consumers find it hard to penetrate and they often will not read it.
That’s a concern and that’s why we’re trying to make things more transparent, simpler and clearer with our “Know Before You Owe” project.
However, simply making things clearer to consumers is not enough if people aren’t actually playing by the rules and defrauding consumers. There we have to enforce the rules and we have to do it fairly, evenhandedly, but with rigor so that everybody understands that they have to follow and respect the law.
Q: Are there practices that are technically legal yet require regulatory action?
A: If something is technically legal, that’s one issue. But we also have the authority to determine that practices are unfair, deceptive and abusive. That’s where our authority can be used to try to protect consumers, even though maybe the technicalities of pre-existing laws have been followed.
So that’s something we’re going to have to be careful about — the use of that authority.
But it certainly is necessary to protect consumers, and frankly there’s a lot of fraud that’s committed in the marketplace that is not on its face necessarily technically illegal. But when you see how a product is marketed, you can see what the effect is on consumers.
Q: So in those situations, what is the most important thing consumers need to know about what the CFPB can and cannot do?
A: Consumers should know that when they feel they’re being treated unfairly, they have the opportunity to come and tell us about it. And I mean the 300 million consumers all across this country, they can come to our website at consumerfinance.gov.
If it’s a mortgage or credit-card issue, they can file a complaint with us.
If it’s any other kind of issue, we will be able to take those complaints eventually.
Q: Once those complaints are in hand, what are the limits of what the CFPB can do?
A: We have three different sets of authority that Congress gave us and that we are by law responsible to carry out. We have rule-making authority. And we particularly are going to be active in trying to correct some of the problems in the mortgage markets over the next year or two.
We have supervision and examination authority, which is new but very important. It’s the ability to actually go into these institutions, look at their books and records and ask questions about what they do, and really get to the bottom of things.
This means both working with them where that’s possible and or bringing enforcement actions where that’s necessary.
And the third is the ability to actually enforce the law.
Q: One of the first industries the agency will be looking at is payday lending. A concern for consumer advocates is that customers often roll over the loans, meaning they repeatedly take out new loans to repay previous loans. What practices in the payday industry raise concerns for you?
A: One of the things we’re very concerned about is making sure that those products actually help consumers and don’t harm them. So the possibility that consumers end up rolling loans over and over, and end up in this sort of debt trap where they’re living off of money at 400 percent interest rates is a concern and it’s something we’re going to look at very closely.
Q: Student loans were a big issue during the Occupy protests, and graduates are burdened with more and more debt. Do you see any parallels to the mortgage industry?
A: I’ve read a lot that suggests that student loans may be a bubble that is developing.
Obviously, the major driver of the total amount of student loans is the rapid increases in tuition and the costs of higher education in the last 10 years. We don’t control that.
What we can control and what we can affect is the choices that consumers make. That they know what their choices are, that they know the difference between federal loans and private student loans — how that can affect terms of repayment, how that can affect the price and interest rate.
These are important things for consumers to know.
http://tourism9.cm/    http://vkins.com/

2012年1月20日星期五

Q&A: Consumer watchdog spells out agency's tasks

A company’s obligations don’t stop with the law. It also needs to be fair and upfront with customers.
That’s the message from Richard Cordray, who was named by President Barack Obama as the first director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
“Frankly there’s a lot of fraud that’s committed in the marketplace that is not on its face necessarily technically illegal,” Cordray said in an interview with The Associated Press. Such practices will now be a target for the CFPB.
The agency and Cordray’s appointment are both controversial. The CFPB was created as part of the overhaul of the nation’s financial regulations, with a mandate to police the array of financial products marketed to consumers.
Republicans blocked Cordray’s appointment for months, saying the agency would have far too much power with too little accountability. Then earlier this month, Obama installed Cordray when Congress wasn’t in session.
With a director finally in place, the CFPB is moving quickly to flex its full authority in policing businesses such as mortgage brokers, student lenders and other businesses that previously escaped federal scrutiny.
On Thursday, the agency released a field guide for its examiners to analyze practices at payday lenders, which essentially offer customers advances on their paychecks for a flat fee. It will mark the first time the industry will be subject to such oversight.
The CFPB has started collecting public comment to help simplify the disclosures consumers receive with credit cards, mortgages and student financial aid. It will take months or even years before consumers see how these efforts play out.
But here’s what Cordray had to say about how the agency will impact consumers:
____
Q: A major focus for the CFPB has been on improving the transparency of a product’s fees and terms, and the disclosures consumers receive. Are there instances where this won’t be enough and more aggressive regulatory action will be required?
A: Let me answer that question in two parts. On transparency and disclosure; a key insight here is that more disclosures don’t always make things better. As it accumulates, there can be so much dense fine print that it can actually make things much worse _ consumers find it hard to penetrate and they often will not read it.
That’s a concern and that’s why we’re trying to make things more transparent, simpler and clearer with our “Know Before You Owe” project.
However, simply making things clearer to consumers is not enough if people aren’t actually playing by the rules and defrauding consumers. There we have to enforce the rules and we have to do it fairly, even handedly, but with rigor so that everybody understands that they have to follow and respect the law.
Q: Are there practices that are technically legal yet require regulatory action?
A: If something is technically legal, that’s one issue. But we also have the authority to determine that practices are unfair, deceptive and abusive. That’s where our authority can be used to try to protect consumers, even though maybe the technicalities of pre-existing laws have been followed.
So that’s something we’re going to have to be careful about _ the use of that authority. But it certainly is necessary to protect consumers and frankly there’s a lot of fraud that’s committed in the marketplace that is not on its face necessarily technically illegal. But when you see how a product is marketed, you can see what the effect is on consumers.
Q: So in those situations, what is the most important thing consumers need to know about what the CFPB can and cannot do?
A: Consumers should know that when they feel they’re being treated unfairly, they have the opportunity to come and tell us about it. And I mean the 300 million consumers all across this country _ they can come to our website at consumerfinance.gov. If it’s a mortgage or credit card issue, they can file a complaint with us.
If it’s any other kind of issue, we will be able to take those complaints eventually.
Q: Once those complaints are in hand, what are the limits of what the CFPB can do?
A: We have three different sets of authority that Congress gave us and that we are by law responsible to carry out. We have rule making authority. And we particularly are going to be active in trying to correct some of the problems in the mortgage markets over the next year or two.
We have supervision and examination authority, which is new but very important. It’s the ability to actually go into these institutions, look at their books and records and ask questions about what they do, and really get to the bottom of things. This means both working with them where that’s possible and or bringing enforcement actions where that’s necessary.
And the third is the ability to actually enforce the law _ which is clearly needed if you’re going to have a marketplace that actually works.
Q: One of the first industries the agency will be looking at is payday lending. A concern for consumer advocates is that customers often roll over the loans, meaning they repeatedly take out new loans to repay previous loans. What practices in the payday industry raise concerns for you?
A: One of the things we’re very concerned about is making sure that those products actually help consumers and don’t harm them. So the possibility that consumers end up rolling loans over and over, and end up in this sort of debt trap where they’re living off of money at 400 percent interest rates is a concern and it’s something we’re going to look at very closely.
Q: Suze Orman has a prepaid card and Amex last year rolled out a prepaid card. Do you see any risks with celebrities and major banks backing prepaid cards, or are there upsides?
A: We generally think consumers need to take care when they’re attracted to a product for reasons that might obscure the actual price and risk involved. People want think carefully about what they’re getting into here.
In the prepaid space in particular, there’s a lot of evolution and there are a lot of new products coming out. Some have appeared to be terrible products and some may be pretty good. We’re monitoring that and as I say, it’s a fast moving market right now and we’re going to consider carefully how to address those issues as they arise
Q: A lot of major banks have adopted this theme of transparency. Chase rolled out new checking account disclosures and Citi has its Simplicity credit card. How much faith do you have that the market can “right itself” in terms of transparency?
A: I have a lot of faith in the market if it is backed by evenhanded, comprehensive rules of the road that everyone knows they have to live by. If the market is left to its own devices or if we regulate part of the market and leave the rest unregulated, as happened with the mortgage market, that created, in my view, a lot of what caused the financial meltdown _ that’s never going to work.
It is our view that what we do will actually strengthen markets.
It’s quite possible that banks would have been moving to more transparency and simpler terms on their own. I happen to think some of that is in reaction to knowing that the consumer bureau is now in place, that it’s something we’re emphasizing.
Q: Student loans were a big issue during the Occupy protests and graduates are burdened with more and more debt. Do you see any parallels to the mortgage industry?
A: I’ve read a lot that suggests that student loans may be a bubble that is developing. Obviously the major driver of the total amount of student loans is the rapid increases in tuition and the costs of higher education in the last 10 years. We don’t control that.
What we can control and what we can affect is the choices that consumers make. That they know what their choices are, that they know the difference between federal loans and private student loans _ how that can affect terms of repayment, how that can affect the price and interest rate. These are important things for consumers to know.
We’re working right now with the Department of Education on an easy to navigate shopping sheet for students and their families.
Q: What role do school financial aid offices have in explaining the costs?
A: You have to examine the particular approach of an institution in context. You have to look at the facts and circumstances. So I wouldn’t make a blanket statement about all student loan offices, but obviously that’s an initial point of contact for the student and their families on the terms of what’s being offered. That needs to be done clearly and it needs to be done so that the student and their family can understand that choice.
It’s our belief that if consumers are presented with information in a clear and understandable fashion, they are the ones who will be able to make the best choices for themselves. It will never be for us to try and make these choices for anyone.
Q: Are companies changing their practices just because they know that the CFPB is out there?
A: I think that you are seeing change in these markets. I think you’re seeing it on three sides.
One side is you now have a bureau with some good tools to actually affect these markets in a constructive way.
On the business side, many of them are recognizing that they should get out in front of it. They’re trying to see what they can change on their own to either head off the enforcement or to try to improve things because they’re persuaded that it needs to be done.
The third side is consumers themselves. And it’s very important for consumers to recognize they have a lot of power in the market. Especially with social media, as they group together and it’s not just an isolated complaint but a group of people with a similar complaint. They can affect these businesses and how they respond to them
It’s important for consumers not only to look to the bureau for help but to look to themselves and help themselves.
___
Candice Choi can be reached at www.twitter.com/candicechoi
http://tourism9.com/    http://vkins.com/

2012年1月13日星期五

Consumer chief puts focus on student loans

WASHINGTON – The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is stepping up its scrutiny of student loans, particularly those made by for-profit colleges and trade schools that have high rates of default, the newly appointed director of the bureau said yesterday.
For more from BostonGlobe.com, sign up or log in below

To continue, please sign up or log in to BostonGlobe.com

Access the full articles and quality reporting of The Boston Globe at BostonGlobe.com

Sign up

Unlimited Access to BostonGlobe.com for 4 weeks for only 99¢.

Are you a Boston Globe home delivery subscriber?

Get FREE access as part of your print subscription.

BostonGlobe.com subscriber

2012年1月12日星期四

Web chat focus was financial aid

BY CATHY JETT
Michael Farris fielded a variety of financial aid questions during the monthly Money Talk$ webchat Tuesday on fredericksburg.com.
Below is a sampling of the inquiries and the answers provided by Germanna Community College’s coordinator and director of financial aid. A complete transcript of the webchat is archived at fredericksburg.com/News/chat3/Archive?chat_id=140.
;”>My daughter is headed to Virginia Tech next year, and financing it will be a stretch for us. Our FAFSA [Free Application for Federal Student Aid] indicates that our EFC [Expected Family Contribution] is well beyond what we will pay, but we don’t have anywhere near that much money set aside.
Are there any good ‘tricks of the trade’ you can offer? Should she get her own apartment next summer to get the aid based off her own income vs. her parents?
–TS in Spotsylvania
Unfortunately, there are no “tricks” to gaining eligibility that way. Her dependency status is not associated with her place of residence or whether or not she earns an income of her own. It is based on her age, primarily. It is very difficult for a student under the age of 24 to gain independency for aid eligibility purposes.
I would recommend her possibly pursuing on-campus student employment for her first year, and maybe balancing that with a low-interest student loan. There are also parent-specific student loans that are available to folks in your situation.
This is a great opportunity to reach out to the folks in the financial aid office at Virginia Tech for more detailed information about what types of aid they have to offer.
Tip: There is no substitute for engaging the financial aid office at the school that the FAFSA is being sent to. Having worked in several different financial aid offices, at schools on both the East and West coasts, I know how critical the conversation between student and family and the college or university is. Plus, each school awards its financial aid differently. As soon as the FAFSA has been completed, call the school.
;”>Do parents’ financial obligations and credit histories have a significant impact on what financial aid is available to their children?
–KD in Fredericksburg
As a rule, no. The FAFSA examines income and assets as opposed to credit scores and familial expenses. The exception would possibly be if a parent is trying to borrow a parent-specific student loan on behalf his or her son or daughter. Federal parent loans require a credit check.
;”>What about students with disabilities does the state work with the college to fund someone that is physically disabled and has no income? Does the college offer funding for disabled students?
–BA in Stafford
Great question. In short, yes. The Federal Application for Aid takes this into account, and is able to identify and assist students with documented disabilities and supplement any existing federal or state disability benefits with additional federal funds for eligible students.
Cathy Jett: 540/374-5407
Email: cjett@freelancestar.com

http://tourism9.com/

2012年1月9日星期一

Financial Check-Up: 10 Steps to Get Mortgage Ready

SANTA ANA, CA–(Marketwire -01/09/12)- Whether you’re financing or refinancing, the thought of applying for a mortgage can be scary. After all, a lot of folks say the mortgage marketplace has largely closed down and that home loans are difficult to get, if not impossible.
“More than four million existing homes were sold in 2011 according to the National Association of Realtors,” said Steve Patton, executive vice president with Carrington Mortgage Services, a lender with 27 offices, and licensed to do business in 42 states. “How can there be so much real estate activity without financing and refinancing? Mortgages are clearly more difficult to get than they were during the real estate boom a few years ago, but millions of loans are still being issued.”
So what’s the secret to getting a home loan in today’s marketplace?
The application process is a lot easier if you prepare in advance.
“The lender has a list of necessary documents which will be needed to create the loan,” said Patton. “While paperwork requirements can vary, borrowers generally have most information in hand. The trick is to organize financial information in advance so you can be mortgage-ready.”
The purpose of a financial check-up is to identify what lenders want and to place that paperwork in a file so you’re ready to apply for a mortgage. The result is that when you apply for a loan, all the required documentation will be in hand and your application will have a great chance to fly through the underwriting process.
What Lenders Really Want
There are lengthy guidelines outlining what lenders need to document loan applications. For borrowers, the best approach is to assume that lenders want everything required for your particular situation and to build an application file from that perspective.
What do you need? Patton said his firm has a lot of information online (www.carringtonhomeloans.com) and that most borrowers can use Carrington’s 10-point application checklist to start a basic file.
1. Income: Tax returns and pay stubs. Have complete tax returns and W-2s in hand for the past three years — just in case a lender wants to go back more than two years. The same with pay stubs: always have the last three or four stubs in the file. If self-employed you may also need a year-to-date profit-and-loss statement, especially if you apply for a loan late in the year.
2. Debts: You must disclose all debts. Lenders will generally have some idea of what you owe from credit reports. However, you’ll need to document debts including account names and numbers, the amount owed and the required monthly payment. Make sure to include debts such as: car loans, student loans, mortgages and credit card accounts. The best approach is to have the latest three monthly statements for each account in the file.
3. Credit: Lenders will pull both credit reports and credit scores from the three major credit reporting bureaus. A credit report can be seen as a history of credit use while a credit score is a statistical measure of credit usage. Borrowers can get free copies of credit reports from AnnualCreditReport.com. Three months before applying for a mortgage get a copy of your report and check it for factual errors and items that are more than seven years old (10 years for bankruptcies). “If you find errors or out-of-date items,” said Patton, “contact the credit reporting agency or creditor to get them removed. Inaccurate information can hurt credit scores and affects the borrower’s ability to qualify in some cases.”
4. Assets: Assets are a sign of financial stability and financial stability very much pleases lenders. Pull together the latest three statements for such things as retirement accounts, stock brokerage accounts, mutual funds, savings, checking, etc.
5. Gifts: If you’re buying property with help from an outside source, lenders will require a gift letter from the donor which confirms that the money you received was not a loan. Note that you can’t get a “gift” from the seller, builder, broker or anyone with an interest in the transaction.
6. VA Loans: Those seeking a VA mortgage but are no longer in the service will need to provide a Certificate of Eligibility (Form DD214). If currently on active duty, lenders will want a letter from your commanding officer to verify service.
7. Divorce: A large number of marriages end in divorce but the usual claim that 50 percent fail is debatable. What’s not debatable is that divorce can impact mortgage applications. Applicants must report all required alimony and child support payments — think of them as a form of debt. Recipients need not include alimony and child support payments in loan applications, however such payments can be counted toward qualifying income if documented.
8. Bankruptcy: More than 1.5 million people declared bankruptcy in both 2010 and 2011. You can sometimes qualify for a new mortgage within two years if the bankruptcy was caused by a hardship such as the loss of a job or a medical emergency — and you have re-established good credit. Lenders will require a bankruptcy to be fully documented, including copies of the petition and discharge.
9. Foreclosure: If you have a foreclosure, expect to wait two to five years for a new mortgage — but longer for those who “walked-away” from a home loan. Lenders will require details regarding exactly what happened and why, as well as a strong credit history after the foreclosure.
10. Rentals: Your tax returns should tell the financial story regarding any rental units you own. Depreciation from rental units — often a big item — can be “added back” to boost qualifying income. Also, lenders will want copies of leases.
“By creating a financial check-up and having the required paperwork in hand, you’ll be able to move quickly through the process and hopefully avoid application headaches and hold-ups,” said Patton. “The 10-point Carrington application list is a way to get started at your own pace, to see what information you have and what verifications you need.”
For a specific list of documents and verifications, speak with lenders well before entering the mortgage marketplace.
Peter G. Miller is a widely-published writer who specializes in mortgages and real estate
http://tourism9.com/

Student loans: Pay them down or start an emergency fund?

Student loans are above $50,000, but there are ways to balance saving with paying down debt. See questions No. 2, 3, and 5 for advice on student loans.
What’s inside? Here are the questions answered in today’s reader mailbag, boiled down to five word summaries.
1. Investing in light of default
2. Debt eradication
3. Loans or emergency fund?
4. Repetitive questions
5. What’s next on my path?
6. Time for a financial advisor?
7. Polite hygiene advice
8. Wedding and financial planning
9. What are readers like?
10. 2012 predictions
Skip to next paragraph
Trent Hamm
The Simple Dollar is a blog for those of us who need both cents and sense: people fighting debt and bad spending habits while building a financially secure future and still affording a latte or two. Our busy lives are crazy enough without having to compare five hundred mutual funds – we just want simple ways to manage our finances and save a little money.

Recent posts

How long does it take for you to stop dating checks and other documents with the previous year after the calendar flips?
I’ll admit that it will probably take me most of January to get used to writing 2012.
Q1: Investing in light of default
I have a small IRA, with half in a mutual fund, which has topped out, and the other half in two stocks which are near to bottoming out, from a lag factor associated with recession and reinvestment.
I anticipate a currency devaluation as an effect of renegotiation or default on national debt limits. Would overseas money markets be a safe place to stash funds from the sale of the mutual while I wait for it to drop so I can repurchase it? If you believe that our debt problems will negatively impact overseas money markets, what is an alternate spot, exclusive of index funds, which will drop as the market does?
- Monica
I don’t think I would trust overseas money markets more than domestic ones, as I think a lot of economies are facing some sort of currency devaluation due to the ongoing economic conditions.
I also wouldn’t bank my entire plan on market timing, particularly when you’re making moves based on a sense of a fund having “topped out” or “bottoming out.” If I were you and I moved forward with this plan, I’d set some thresholds on when to buy back in. For example, you might want to say that you’ll buy back in after three months if either the value of the fund is down, say, 15% or it matches the value you sold it at.
Don’t worry about what the absolute top of the market is or what the bottom is – worry about making money for yourself.
Q2: Debt eradication
I’m a 22-year old student who will graduate with a B.A. in December. I took out some federal and private loans to pay for school. I saved for the past year and paid off the private loans while in school. I’ll be left with $16,000 at 6.8% when I graduate. I have no other debt and a 3-month emergency fund ($6,000). I plan to make payments well over the minimum to pay this balance off in 2 years or less.
Is this a good thing? The more I research credit and credit scores, it seems that a relatively low-balance loan isn’t a bad thing to keep around for ten, even fifteen years. However, having a positive net worth is my #1 priority. Should I be making aggressive payments or simply using that money to pad my retirement and savings while keeping the loan around? While paying the loan aggressively I’ll still be contributing 15% of my net income to an IRA. I have one credit card with a $500 limit; never carried a balance. I pay bills on time every month. I currently rent. A house isn’t on my to-do list, and I’ll buy a car outright if I get one in the future. Is it enough to build my credit without a credit card balance, mortgage, car payment, and (soon) no student loan?
- Belinda
I don’t think the value of having a 6.8% student loan (in terms of your credit score) is worth the financial cost of having to pay 6.8% interest on the balance every year. If it’s within your means without causing other financial troubles, I would pay it off sooner rather than later.
Given that you do have a continuing line of credit in the form of your credit card, your credit report won’t go completely empty after you pay off the student loan. I would consider using the card regularly (and paying off the balance) and being open to moderate raises in your credit limit.
You’re doing very well. Keep along your current path and you’ll continue to do very well.
Q3: Loans or emergency fund?
I’ll graduate from grad school this May with $25,500 in federal subsidized loans (spouse and I also still have $27k combined undergrad debt at 5.3%). I haven’t technically needed these loans for the last year of school but because they’re subsidized I’ve been storing the money in a rewards checking account earning about 3%. It will be around 12,000 total in November when the subsidization ends and 6.8% interest kicks in. This is the extent of our short-term savings/emergency fund right now (my spouse and I are also saving for retirement). So, since we are looking to save for life’s big things in the next few years (car, family, and house, probably in that order), and we don’t have a defined emergency fund amount, I wonder how much of that 12k should we pay back immediately? We’re currently steadily employed though I’m seeking new full-time work in my desired field instead of my current part-time job. We have roughly $1000 extra/month to put to good use on student loan repayment and savings (we’re a pretty frugal couple), but I’m not sure what the best combination would be. We have to pay minimum $400/mo on our student loans. Is it best to pay more on student loans and postpone more emergency/car/baby/home savings? Is it best to pay back the entire $12k “savings” (which is really borrowed money) and start our “real” savings from scratch? I’m lost and confused and would be interested in your and your readers’ opinions. 
- Danika
If I were you, I would establish a new emergency fund and fund it with enough money to provide three months or so of living expenses for you and your partner. I would then use the remainder to pay off your highest loan and then use the subsequent $1,000 per month toward minimum payments and whatever loan has the highest interest rate.
I would count that 6.8% loan as already having that rate and make “payments” on that debt to a savings account. Then, when the subsidization ends, I’d pay the entire balance of that savings account to that 6.8% loan.
In terms of balancing emergency protection and a path toward debt freedom, I think this is a very good plan.
Q4: Repetitive questions
I’ve noticed that there are a lot of consistent shall we say themes in your reader mailbag questions. Student loans come up a lot for example and so does retirement. Why repeat so much?
- Shaun
The reason these stories show up so often is because they’re the type of concerns that cause people to really start thinking about their finances and because they are so common among people. A lot of people leave college with student loans and they worry about paying them off.
I use a lot of these types of questions because there are a lot of variations in the story and because it’s a genuine concern that a lot of people out there have.
I try to choose questions that reflect the whole of the questions that I receive. I do often pick out specific interesting ones, but I also see from my email inbox that I get a LOT of questions about student loans, so I cover those questions.
Q5: What’s next on my path?
I’m now fortunate to be in a position where I’m (finally) earning a great wage at a company I have no intention of leaving anytime soon, living in a city (NYC) that I love, and living well below my means.
It’s been drilled into me for years that paying off your credit card(s) and building a healthy emergency fund are the first foundation steps to a healthy financial life. I’ve accomplished both (finally!), and have $0 credit card debt (only one credit card), and $11,000 in savings. I still have outstanding student loans, which I’m paying back and contributing more than the minimum on each month – these are at a very low interest rate, and the total repayment each month comes to $350. Paying off one would save me about half of that amount as the payments are pretty much equal between the loans.
I’m also putting $12,000/year into a 401(k), and am planning on continuing to contribute $1,000/mo into my savings account for the next 9 months – until it reaches $20,000. Since I live in NYC, I plan on renting for quite a few more years and I’m planning ahead for when I’ll want to move (moving into a new apartment here typically costs $4-5,000 upfront in costs for my price range – first month’s rent, last month’s rent, possibly a broker’s fee and a security deposit). 6 months of my bills (if I were laid off) comes to about $15,000, and that’s my emergency fund savings goal since I don’t have close family in the area and wouldn’t want to have to move due to prolonged unemployment. The $20,000 goal for this year assumes that I’ll want to move within the next year, which is a possibility (but not set in stone).
I’m not in a hurry to change my plans right now as I still have a bit of time left to contribute to my savings account, but I’d like to have some solid steps in place when I get there.
So – what comes next? It seems like after the savings account, credit card and retirement account are all healthy (or being contributed to healthily), that any number of options open up. I don’t get an employer match on my 401(k), so it’s 100% my own money in there, and I’d like to max it out for a few years, due to not being able to contribute anything in my younger 20′s (4 years of working w/o the spare $$ to contribute). But, I’ll still have a good amount of money that I’m now putting into savings left over after maxing out my 401(k), and I want to make sure I’m investing it wisely, if that’s even the right first step after this.
Are there any recommended steps after this point, or does it depend on the individual and their goals?
- Jill
It really comes down to goal-setting more than anything else.
Simply put, there is no general right way to invest. There are only good ways to invest to help you reach a specific goal. If you don’t know what you’re saving for, you’re probably going to save in an inopportune manner.
Let’s say, for example, that you decide to start investing in stocks because you heard they have a great return, not because you had any goals in mind. Let’s say you make this decision in January 2008. In December 2008, you decide to buy a house because you got pregnant and you decided you needed a house for that child. Your money has now lost 40% of its value.
You would have been far better off in a savings account had you incorporated the idea of buying a house in the next one or two years into your plan.
Spend some time thinking about where you want your life to be in five years or ten years. Where are you headed? Your investment choices should really follow that.
Jill also had a follow-up question.


http://tourism9.com/

2012年1月3日星期二

Financing College Costs in 2012: Smart Tips

Most likely, your 529 plan and equity in your home are still down, but tuition keeps rising. Still, there’s money out there for students who need help with college financing. Here are 12 tips to help you attend school for less in 2012.
Go to college despite the job market
The year 2011 provided several arguments to skip college — high unemployment rates, tuition hikes and a harsh job market for grads. Go anyway.
“The jobs that are growing, the industries that are growing and the markets that are going to be available to students are those that require higher education,” says Brittania Morey, spokeswoman for the Iowa College Access Network. “Students who are choosing to go to college are preparing themselves for the work world of tomorrow.”
According to a 2010 report by Georgetown University, 63% of jobs offered by 2018 will require postsecondary education. Morey says students can cut college costs by searching for scholarships early and investigating awards in their community.
Don’t eliminate yourself
The biggest mistake students make is believing they’re not eligible for college aid. A 2009 study by Finaid.org showed that 2.3 million students who would have been eligible for the federal Pell Grant missed free college cash because they didn’t apply.
While students attending pricey institutions frequently apply for aid, the likelihood is lower at cheaper schools and community colleges, says Diana Fuentes-Michel, executive director of the California Student Aid Commission.
“That’s where folks tend to believe that they wouldn’t qualify for financial aid because of the low cost,” she says.
The U.S. Department of Education reports that all students, regardless of income or financial assets, are eligible for up to $27,000 in federal Stafford Loans over four years.
File for FAFSA fast
The Free Application for Federal Student Aid, or FAFSA, qualifies students for federal grants, loans and work-study jobs as well as some private and state-sponsored awards. Filing it as close to Jan. 1 as possible maximizes your college aid eligibility, says Lynda Forster, CEO of the financial aid consulting group Collegiate Capital Corp. in Mineola, N.Y.
“Most (families) think that financial aid forms must be completed after the tax returns are done, and that is not accurate,” she says. “You cannot wait until April. All of the money is already awarded.”
Since federal grants are distributed on a first-come, first-served basis, Forster recommends that families file the form using estimates of their income and assets. If they need to change something, families can file corrections at FAFSA.ed.gov.
Choose your major carefully
From private loan-forgiveness programs to state and federal grants, there’s money available to students majoring in high-demand fields. While the federal government offers up to $4,000 per year to future educators through the Teacher Education Assistance for College and Higher Education, or TEACH, Grant Program, individual states offer similar college financing initiatives for up-and-coming teachers, nurses, fire and emergency medical technicians, public defenders, child care employees, health care workers and those pursuing jobs in other fields.
Students who know their major can check with their school’s financial aid office to see if there are awards available in their fields. Professional organizations and nonprofits, such as the National Restaurant Association and the National Environmental Health Association, also offer awards to students in specific fields of study.
Find a ‘safety’ school
Guidance counselors recommend that students apply to an academically safe school. Martha Savery, director of community outreach for the Massachusetts Educational Financing Authority, recommends that students apply to a financially safe school, too.
“We always tell families (not to) self-select based on the cost that you see in the admissions material because many colleges and universities are able to provide a substantive financial aid package,” Savery says.
As of Oct. 29, all institutions that receive federal funding are required to post a net price calculator on their website that can help families estimate college costs with aid factored in, according to the National Center for Education Statistics. Students also can compare net prices of different schools by income level on the NCES website.
Meet the deadlines
With more students vying for aid, there’s stiff competition for dollars. Don’t eliminate yourself by missing a deadline, Savery says.
“If your child was applying for admission to XYZ university, you would not contact that admissions office and say ‘You know, I’d like just three or four more days just to tweak my essay,’” she says. “(Families) need to look at the deadlines from a financial aid perspective in exactly the same way.”
Ask the boss
A 2010 study by Business and Legal Resources, a compliance consulting firm in Old Saybrook, Conn., showed that nearly 85% of U.S. companies offer tuition reimbursement to employees. That’s up from 52% in 2007.
There are some pretty big catches. More than 75% of employers require that course work be job-related to qualify for reimbursement. Companies also may restrict how much reimbursement employees can get, require a certain grade point average or limit reimbursement to employees at a certain job level. More than 60% of companies offering reimbursement require employees to stay with the organization after completing study.
Go federal first
Federal loans are still the cheapest student loans. Through June 30, subsidized Stafford Loans will carry a 3.4% fixed interest rate. All Stafford Loans — subsidized, unsubsidized and grad loans included — disbursed after June 30 have a 6.8% fixed interest rate, according to the Department of Education. Stafford Loans are capped at $27,000 over four years for dependent students, but Morey says that federal loans to parents can help.
Through the Parent PLUS Loan, families can borrow up to the cost of attendance minus financial aid the student has received, and they’ll only pay 7.9% in interest — a rate that’s far below those of many private loans, according to DOE.
Cap those loans
Federal student loans also can be capped at 15% of a student’s “discretionary income.” That’s defined as earnings above 150% of the poverty line. For 2011, discretionary income would include earnings above $16,335 for a family of one, according to the Department of Health and Human Services. Earn less than $16,335, and the federal government won’t charge you anything for your student loan as long as your income stays below that threshold.
A double bonus is that students who make consecutive loan payments for 25 years will have their debt forgiven, according to the Oakland, Calif.-based Project on Student Debt. The time frame is reduced to 10 years for students who work in public-service professions such as teaching or social work after graduation.
Despite the tremendous potential savings, research shows that few students take advantage of the program. A White House fact sheet from October says that only about 1.3% of students with federal loans opt for income-based repayment.
Fight the hikes
Thanks to state budget cuts, tuition and fees at the average two- and four-year public institutions rose by about 7% this year, according to the College Board in New York. But in states such as Florida and California, prices at undergraduate state universities rose by 15% or more.
“The immediate kind of response to (tuition hikes) is to put it on a credit card or to look to their parents to try to get them to take a loan out,” says Fuentes-Michel.
The problem is that parents frequently can’t take on additional debt, and credit card interest rates are substantially higher than those of federal student loans. Instead of falling in the plastic trap, Fuentes-Michel recommends that students look to federal loans, private scholarships and part-time employment for college financing.
Save the right way
One of the strangest loopholes of financial aid is that how you save can impact your aid just as much as how much you save.
“Money put into a student’s name is not the place where you want to park it,” says Forster. “A student’s assets and income (are) counted much higher than a parent’s.”
While assets saved in a parent’s name can subtract up to 6 cents for every dollar from your federal need-based scholarships and grants package, every dollar of student assets takes away 20 cents, according to the White House’s National Economic Council. Money saved in a grandparent’s or relative’s name won’t count at all. However, 529 plans are one exception. Funds stored in a 529 plan in the student’s name count as parental assets, according to FinAid.org, the college financing resources website.
Reconsider 529 college savings plans
Many 529 plans lost value when the market dipped in 2008, but they’re coming back — this time with more conservative investment options. In the past two years, states including Nebraska and Indiana have added financial options insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. that allow parents to access 529 tax incentives without taking any market risks.
On top of providing federal tax-free growth, certain states also provide state tax incentives and matching grants to encourage account holders to save.
Copyright 2012, Bankrate Inc.


http://tourism9.com/