BRADENTON, Fla.–(BUSINESS WIRE)–
The executive leadership of First Titan Corp. (OTCBB: FTTN.OB – News) will seek out lucrative new business opportunities at the National Investment Banking Association (NIBA) Conference this week in New Orleans.
The conference will provide a forum for emerging companies seeking financing or exposure to present their story to venture capitalists, early-stage investors and industry leaders. The organization’s 121st conference, it is planned to be a comprehensive showcase of cutting-edge, innovative entrepreneurs and businesses from across the country, including up-and-comers in the energy sector.
First Titan is in search of potentially lucrative new partnerships, joint venture candidates and possible acquisitions that will increase the company’s developing foothold in the energy industry. The NIBA Conference will offer a prime opportunity for the company to network with rising stars in need of assistance in funding, marketing and distributing their projects.
The conference runs Thursday through Friday at the Le Pavillon hotel.
For more information on FTTN’s energy exploration initiative, please visit www.firsttitanenergy.com/investors.
First Titan is working to develop new energy solutions to compete in a booming global industry alongside Chesapeake Energy Corp. (NYSE: CHK), Anadarko Petroleum Corp. (NYSE: APC), SandRidge Energy Inc. (NYSE: SD) and Apache Corp. (NYSE: APA).
About First Titan Corp.
First Titan Corp., through its wholly owned subsidiary, First Titan Energy, LLC, is committed to the exploration and development of oil and natural gas resources around the globe. The company continually seeks to partner with energy developers that are pursuing innovative new methods of oil and gas extraction, including the development of new technologies, cleaner methods and unconventional resources.
For more information about First Titan Energy, please visit www.firsttitanenergy.com. Follow us on Twitter at www.twitter.com/firsttitancorp.
Notice Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: This news release contains forward-looking information within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including statements that include the words “believes,” “expects,” “anticipate” or similar expressions. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the company to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. In addition, description of anyone’s past success, either financial or strategic, is no guarantee of future success. This news release speaks as of the date first set forth above and the company assumes no responsibility to update the information included herein for events occurring after the date hereof.
http://tourism9.cm/ http://vkins.com/
2012年2月21日星期二
Highlights: Euro zone ministers, officials after Greek deal
BRUSSELS (Reuters) – Euro zone finance ministers and representatives of the private sector finalized a deal on Tuesday that will provide 130 billion euros of new financing to Greece and help to cut Athens‘ debt-to-GDP ratio to just over 120 percent by 2020.
The deal relies on private sector holders of Greek government bonds accepting a greater than 53 percent loss on the nominal value of their holdings, which will help reduce Greece’s debt by around 100 billion euros.
Following are comments by ministers and officials after the talks, which lasted more than 13 hours.
IMF MANAGING DIRECTOR CHRISTINE LAGARDE
“I will take this matter further to the board of the IMF in the second week of March, obviously subject to prior action that Greece has committed to deliver before the end of February being actually delivered.”
EU COMMISSIONER FOR ECONOMIC AND MONETARY AFFAIRS OLLI REHN ON COMBINING EFSF AND ESM POWER
“It should be possible to combine the firepower of the ESM and the remaining amount of the EFSF in order to have a substantially stronger financial firewall than we have at the moment. If you calculate you can see the ESM is 500 billion euro and the EFSF remainder is 250 billion euro, that is a good starting point to reinforce the IMF resources.
“I expect that we can reach our decision in March so that we can come to a conclusion on the reinforcement of the IMF resources in the course of this spring.”
EUROGROUP PRESIDENT JEAN-CLAUDE JUNCKER
“After a meeting of at least 13 hours, we have reached a far reaching agreement on Greece’s new program and private sector involvement that would lead to a significant debt reduction for Greece and pave the way towards an unprecedented amount of new official financing being provided by the EFSF to secure Greece’s future in the euro area.
“The debt to GDP ratio is expected to reach 120.5 percent by 2020 and program financing is estimated to amount to 130 billion until 2014.
“Greece will launch bond exchange offer in coming days.
“Given the balanced agreement reached with the creditor group led by the IIF and the fact that the package delivers debt sustainability for Greece we expect a high participation rate.”
ON PRIVATE SECTOR ROLE
“In order to show our good faith to the private sector the official sector will be making an important contribution.
“Creditors will implement a further lowering of lending margins of bilateral loans to Greece to 150 bps over the entire period of loans compared to the current margin of 200 bps over the first three years and 300 bps thereafter.
“This will bring the debt-to-GDP ratio down by 2.8 percent by 2020.
ON NATIONAL CENTRAL BANKS’ ROLE
“Governments of member states where central banks currently hold Greek bonds in their investment portfolios will commit to pass on to Greece an amount equal to any future income.
“This will lower financing needs by 1.8 billion euros.”
ON MONITORING OF ATHENS
“The Commission will reinforce the task force for Greece.
“The troika will also substantially reinforce its presence in Athens in order to counteract any slippage in Athens.
“In the meantime a mechanism will be put in place to better trace and monitor funds put in place to service Greece’s debt,” he said, referring to the setting up of an escrow-style account.
GERMAN FINANCE MINISTER WOLFGANG SCHAEUBLE
“The new program for Greece will be 100 bln euros plus 30 bln for the swap deal as agreed. To reach this, given the fresh numbers since the decision of the summit, the private sector had to move a bit further in negotiations. We agreed a haircut of 53.5 percent and the coupon for the new bonds will start at about 2 percent, will rise with time from 3 to 4.3 percent after 2020. In this way we will reach the reduction in debt.
“It’s a result that can be justified and that creates the preconditions to get Greece onto a sustainable return to economic health if the swap deal with private creditors is successful. We didn’t make it easy on ourselves. We insisted that the parameters of debt sustainability of 120 pct of GDP will be maintained just like the 130 billion as an upper limit for the second Greek program.
“All of that now depends on the reaction from the private sector and besides, it’s all conditional on Greece fulfilling the prior actions. Greece has agreed a number of measures but there are others… that it has to get onto the way legally by the end of the month. We also agreed that we as the eurogroup will check this immediately at the start of March on the basis of the troika report.
“The Commission has said it will significantly strengthen the use of staff for the monitoring, advice and support of Greek authorities in implementing these measures and we as member states have also said we’ d provide staff if wanted and requested.
ON IMF
“The IMF has promised it will take part in the new program, but the decision is not a foregone conclusion on the IMF board, so it’s not helpful for us in the eurogroup to talk about it. Madame Lagarde will make the proposal to the IMF board and it will agree. We have voiced our expectations but we also know that we have to accept that each member in the IMF board has its own responsibility.”
(Reporting Claire Davenport and Annika Breidthardt)
http://tourism9.cm/ http://vkins.com/
The deal relies on private sector holders of Greek government bonds accepting a greater than 53 percent loss on the nominal value of their holdings, which will help reduce Greece’s debt by around 100 billion euros.
Following are comments by ministers and officials after the talks, which lasted more than 13 hours.
IMF MANAGING DIRECTOR CHRISTINE LAGARDE
“I will take this matter further to the board of the IMF in the second week of March, obviously subject to prior action that Greece has committed to deliver before the end of February being actually delivered.”
EU COMMISSIONER FOR ECONOMIC AND MONETARY AFFAIRS OLLI REHN ON COMBINING EFSF AND ESM POWER
“It should be possible to combine the firepower of the ESM and the remaining amount of the EFSF in order to have a substantially stronger financial firewall than we have at the moment. If you calculate you can see the ESM is 500 billion euro and the EFSF remainder is 250 billion euro, that is a good starting point to reinforce the IMF resources.
“I expect that we can reach our decision in March so that we can come to a conclusion on the reinforcement of the IMF resources in the course of this spring.”
EUROGROUP PRESIDENT JEAN-CLAUDE JUNCKER
“After a meeting of at least 13 hours, we have reached a far reaching agreement on Greece’s new program and private sector involvement that would lead to a significant debt reduction for Greece and pave the way towards an unprecedented amount of new official financing being provided by the EFSF to secure Greece’s future in the euro area.
“The debt to GDP ratio is expected to reach 120.5 percent by 2020 and program financing is estimated to amount to 130 billion until 2014.
“Greece will launch bond exchange offer in coming days.
“Given the balanced agreement reached with the creditor group led by the IIF and the fact that the package delivers debt sustainability for Greece we expect a high participation rate.”
ON PRIVATE SECTOR ROLE
“In order to show our good faith to the private sector the official sector will be making an important contribution.
“Creditors will implement a further lowering of lending margins of bilateral loans to Greece to 150 bps over the entire period of loans compared to the current margin of 200 bps over the first three years and 300 bps thereafter.
“This will bring the debt-to-GDP ratio down by 2.8 percent by 2020.
ON NATIONAL CENTRAL BANKS’ ROLE
“Governments of member states where central banks currently hold Greek bonds in their investment portfolios will commit to pass on to Greece an amount equal to any future income.
“This will lower financing needs by 1.8 billion euros.”
ON MONITORING OF ATHENS
“The Commission will reinforce the task force for Greece.
“The troika will also substantially reinforce its presence in Athens in order to counteract any slippage in Athens.
“In the meantime a mechanism will be put in place to better trace and monitor funds put in place to service Greece’s debt,” he said, referring to the setting up of an escrow-style account.
GERMAN FINANCE MINISTER WOLFGANG SCHAEUBLE
“The new program for Greece will be 100 bln euros plus 30 bln for the swap deal as agreed. To reach this, given the fresh numbers since the decision of the summit, the private sector had to move a bit further in negotiations. We agreed a haircut of 53.5 percent and the coupon for the new bonds will start at about 2 percent, will rise with time from 3 to 4.3 percent after 2020. In this way we will reach the reduction in debt.
“It’s a result that can be justified and that creates the preconditions to get Greece onto a sustainable return to economic health if the swap deal with private creditors is successful. We didn’t make it easy on ourselves. We insisted that the parameters of debt sustainability of 120 pct of GDP will be maintained just like the 130 billion as an upper limit for the second Greek program.
“All of that now depends on the reaction from the private sector and besides, it’s all conditional on Greece fulfilling the prior actions. Greece has agreed a number of measures but there are others… that it has to get onto the way legally by the end of the month. We also agreed that we as the eurogroup will check this immediately at the start of March on the basis of the troika report.
“The Commission has said it will significantly strengthen the use of staff for the monitoring, advice and support of Greek authorities in implementing these measures and we as member states have also said we’ d provide staff if wanted and requested.
ON IMF
“The IMF has promised it will take part in the new program, but the decision is not a foregone conclusion on the IMF board, so it’s not helpful for us in the eurogroup to talk about it. Madame Lagarde will make the proposal to the IMF board and it will agree. We have voiced our expectations but we also know that we have to accept that each member in the IMF board has its own responsibility.”
(Reporting Claire Davenport and Annika Breidthardt)
http://tourism9.cm/ http://vkins.com/
2012年2月20日星期一
Tags
HONG KONG, February 20 (Reuters) – News and developments in Asia private equity from Reuters News for Lunar New Year and the week ending Feb. 17.
FEBRUARY 17
CARLYLE GROUP has begun the process of selling its over $300 million stake in Taiwan’s Ta Chong Bank Ltd, sources said, as it joins other private equity firms in looking to exit the island’s low-margin financial sector.
MMI INTERNATIONAL, a technology company owned by private equity fund KKR & Co LP, will price its $300 million five-year bond at 8 percent in New York, the bottom end of price guidance, after receiving strong support from U.S. investors, according to a source familiar with the matter.
AUSTRALIAN SURFWEAR company Billabong International rebuffed a $820 million private equity bid from TPG Capital , announcing plans to sell a stake in its Nixon watch brand and close up to 150 stores, sending its shares up by more than 50 percent.
CHINA HAS launched a 50 billion yuan ($7.93 billion) fund in Shanghai to aid overseas acquisitions by Chinese companies as part of efforts to promote international use of the yuan and build the commercial hub into a global financial center.
HANA FINANCIAL Group said that it had reached a deal with the labour union of Korea Exchange Bank (KEB) which had threatened to strike over possible job losses following Hana’s acquisition of KEB.
FEBRUARY 16
WINS INVESTMENT, the fund arm of Chinese property developer Gemdale, says it plans to double funds under management to take advantage of a government clampdown on property financing that could see smaller developers starved of funds.
L CAPITAL Asia, the private equity arm of the world’s biggest luxury goods group LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SA , could begin raising a new fund of more than $1 billion this year, as competition from Western brands creates opportunities to invest in Chinese retailers, its top executive said.
CANADA PENSION Plan Investment Board, which manages the country’s second largest pension fund, has hired former Goldman Sachs banker Mark Machin to head its Asia-Pacific business, according to a source close to the matter.
FEBRUARY 15
L CAPITAL has bought the 8 percent stake held by Wolfensohn Capital Partners in unlisted Indian ethnic wear chain Fabindia, two sources with direct knowledge of the matter said.
SOUTH KOREA’S National Pension Service (NPS), the world’s No.4 largest pension fund, plans to invest around $300 million in a real estate opportunity fund led by Blackstone Group , an NPS official said, amid the fund’s efforts to step up its investments in real estate assets.
U.S PRIVATE equity fund Norwest Venture Partners has invested $15 million in Manthan Systems, an unlisted Indian software products company, for a minority stake, the Indian company said on Wednesday.
WANT WANT China Holdings, the buyer of private equity fund MBK Partners’ Taiwan cable TV unit, will have to give more information to the island’s broadcast regulator concerning its media operations, the latest delay in the $2.4 billion deal.
JAPANESE PRIVATE equity secondary fund Ant Capital Partners said it closed its third Japanese secondaries fund at the end of December 2011 raising $140 million, attracting commitments from 15 Japanese institutional investors.
SOUTH KOREA’S SK Group is in talks to take over U.S. oil and gas company Chaparral Energy, a company 36 percent owned by CCMP, according to a source familiar with the matter.
FEBRUARY 14
TALKS BETWEEN Yahoo Inc and China’s Alibaba Group over the U.S. Internet giant’s Asian assets have hit an impasse, throwing their plans for a $17 billion tax-free asset swap into question, according to sources briefed on the situation.
CARLYLE SAID it would sell Talaris, a provider of cash-counting equipment, to Japan’s Glory Ltd for 650 million pounds ($1 billion), twice the value of its original investment.
INDONESIA WILL not implement a planned regulation to limit ownership in domestic banks, since it does not want to scare away potential foreign investors from the sale of state-owned Bank Mutiara, the state deposit agency (LPS) said.
FIDELITY GROWTH Partners, the private equity arm of Fidelity Worldwide Investment, along with existing investors have invested 2 billion rupees ($40.6 million) in Aptuit Laurus Pvt Ltd, an unlisted Indian pharma company.
EXCLUSIVE-AN Abu Dhabi sovereign wealth fund is exploring the sale of its $1.3 billion stake in Malaysian lender RHB Capital Bhd six months after buying the shares, sources familiar with the matter told Reuters, and has engaged in early talks with Japan’s Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp (SMBC).
FEBRUARY 13
U.S.-BASED private asset management firm Rohatyn Group said on Monday that it has agreed to acquire 60 percent of CapAsia, the private equity arm of Malaysia’s CIMB Group Holdings Bhd .
FEBRUARY 10
INDIA’S RELIANCE Communications reported its 10th straight quarter of declining profit as interest costs soared, with investors betting on a sale of the No. 2 mobile operator’s tower business to pare its heavy debt load.http://tourism9.com/ http://vkins.com/
FEBRUARY 17
CARLYLE GROUP has begun the process of selling its over $300 million stake in Taiwan’s Ta Chong Bank Ltd, sources said, as it joins other private equity firms in looking to exit the island’s low-margin financial sector.
MMI INTERNATIONAL, a technology company owned by private equity fund KKR & Co LP, will price its $300 million five-year bond at 8 percent in New York, the bottom end of price guidance, after receiving strong support from U.S. investors, according to a source familiar with the matter.
AUSTRALIAN SURFWEAR company Billabong International rebuffed a $820 million private equity bid from TPG Capital , announcing plans to sell a stake in its Nixon watch brand and close up to 150 stores, sending its shares up by more than 50 percent.
CHINA HAS launched a 50 billion yuan ($7.93 billion) fund in Shanghai to aid overseas acquisitions by Chinese companies as part of efforts to promote international use of the yuan and build the commercial hub into a global financial center.
HANA FINANCIAL Group said that it had reached a deal with the labour union of Korea Exchange Bank (KEB) which had threatened to strike over possible job losses following Hana’s acquisition of KEB.
FEBRUARY 16
WINS INVESTMENT, the fund arm of Chinese property developer Gemdale, says it plans to double funds under management to take advantage of a government clampdown on property financing that could see smaller developers starved of funds.
L CAPITAL Asia, the private equity arm of the world’s biggest luxury goods group LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SA , could begin raising a new fund of more than $1 billion this year, as competition from Western brands creates opportunities to invest in Chinese retailers, its top executive said.
CANADA PENSION Plan Investment Board, which manages the country’s second largest pension fund, has hired former Goldman Sachs banker Mark Machin to head its Asia-Pacific business, according to a source close to the matter.
FEBRUARY 15
L CAPITAL has bought the 8 percent stake held by Wolfensohn Capital Partners in unlisted Indian ethnic wear chain Fabindia, two sources with direct knowledge of the matter said.
SOUTH KOREA’S National Pension Service (NPS), the world’s No.4 largest pension fund, plans to invest around $300 million in a real estate opportunity fund led by Blackstone Group , an NPS official said, amid the fund’s efforts to step up its investments in real estate assets.
U.S PRIVATE equity fund Norwest Venture Partners has invested $15 million in Manthan Systems, an unlisted Indian software products company, for a minority stake, the Indian company said on Wednesday.
WANT WANT China Holdings, the buyer of private equity fund MBK Partners’ Taiwan cable TV unit, will have to give more information to the island’s broadcast regulator concerning its media operations, the latest delay in the $2.4 billion deal.
JAPANESE PRIVATE equity secondary fund Ant Capital Partners said it closed its third Japanese secondaries fund at the end of December 2011 raising $140 million, attracting commitments from 15 Japanese institutional investors.
SOUTH KOREA’S SK Group is in talks to take over U.S. oil and gas company Chaparral Energy, a company 36 percent owned by CCMP, according to a source familiar with the matter.
FEBRUARY 14
TALKS BETWEEN Yahoo Inc and China’s Alibaba Group over the U.S. Internet giant’s Asian assets have hit an impasse, throwing their plans for a $17 billion tax-free asset swap into question, according to sources briefed on the situation.
CARLYLE SAID it would sell Talaris, a provider of cash-counting equipment, to Japan’s Glory Ltd for 650 million pounds ($1 billion), twice the value of its original investment.
INDONESIA WILL not implement a planned regulation to limit ownership in domestic banks, since it does not want to scare away potential foreign investors from the sale of state-owned Bank Mutiara, the state deposit agency (LPS) said.
FIDELITY GROWTH Partners, the private equity arm of Fidelity Worldwide Investment, along with existing investors have invested 2 billion rupees ($40.6 million) in Aptuit Laurus Pvt Ltd, an unlisted Indian pharma company.
EXCLUSIVE-AN Abu Dhabi sovereign wealth fund is exploring the sale of its $1.3 billion stake in Malaysian lender RHB Capital Bhd six months after buying the shares, sources familiar with the matter told Reuters, and has engaged in early talks with Japan’s Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp (SMBC).
FEBRUARY 13
U.S.-BASED private asset management firm Rohatyn Group said on Monday that it has agreed to acquire 60 percent of CapAsia, the private equity arm of Malaysia’s CIMB Group Holdings Bhd .
FEBRUARY 10
INDIA’S RELIANCE Communications reported its 10th straight quarter of declining profit as interest costs soared, with investors betting on a sale of the No. 2 mobile operator’s tower business to pare its heavy debt load.http://tourism9.com/ http://vkins.com/
Budget must provide 'clarity'
http://tourism9.com/ http://vkins.com/
Independent Newspapers
Finance Minister Pravin Gordhan. Photo: Neil BaynesIn the Budget speech on February 22, the SA Chamber of Commerce and Industry (Sacci) will be “seeking clarity” on a number of issues, its CEO Neren Rau says.
These issues include the planned financing model of the various infrastructure investment programs and the specific borrowing strategy to avoid crowding out of the private sector, as well as the progress already made on provincial interventions by the National Treasury and the expected timelines for continued assistance to these provincial governments towards restoration of a conducive business environment and fiscal sustainability.
Sacci also wants information on the strategy to achieve a tax neutral outcome for the South African business community given the possible additional taxes such as the carbon tax and local business tax as well as progress on finding a suitable funding model for the National Health Insurance (NHI) scheme.
Other issues on which clarity is required concern tangible and immediate measures to cut regulatory bottlenecks and red tape for business generally, and SMEs in particular, in order to reduce the cost of doing business in SA.
Information on progress on the integration of development finance institutions (DFIs) and general business support, promotion initiatives and plans to ease the access to finance for SMEs is also required, according to Sacci.
Clarity for foreign and domestic investors on economic stability specifically relating to concerns on nationalisation is needed and Sacci hopes that the Budget statement “will reflect a business-friendly fiscal policy that reduces the many hindrances to achieving economic growth and job creation by the private sector in SA.” – I-Net Bridge
Independent NewspapersFinance Minister Pravin Gordhan. Photo: Neil Baynes
These issues include the planned financing model of the various infrastructure investment programs and the specific borrowing strategy to avoid crowding out of the private sector, as well as the progress already made on provincial interventions by the National Treasury and the expected timelines for continued assistance to these provincial governments towards restoration of a conducive business environment and fiscal sustainability.
Sacci also wants information on the strategy to achieve a tax neutral outcome for the South African business community given the possible additional taxes such as the carbon tax and local business tax as well as progress on finding a suitable funding model for the National Health Insurance (NHI) scheme.
Other issues on which clarity is required concern tangible and immediate measures to cut regulatory bottlenecks and red tape for business generally, and SMEs in particular, in order to reduce the cost of doing business in SA.
Information on progress on the integration of development finance institutions (DFIs) and general business support, promotion initiatives and plans to ease the access to finance for SMEs is also required, according to Sacci.
Clarity for foreign and domestic investors on economic stability specifically relating to concerns on nationalisation is needed and Sacci hopes that the Budget statement “will reflect a business-friendly fiscal policy that reduces the many hindrances to achieving economic growth and job creation by the private sector in SA.” – I-Net Bridge
2012年2月17日星期五
Arbor Realty Trust Schedules Fourth Quarter 2011 Earnings Date
UNIONDALE, N.Y., Feb. 17, 2012 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. (NYSE:ABR – News), a real estate investment trust focused on the business of investing in real estate related bridge and mezzanine loans, preferred and direct equity investments, mortgage-related securities and other real estate related assets, today announced that the Company is scheduled to release financial results for the three month period ended December 31, 2011, before market open on Friday, March 2, 2012. The Company will host a conference call to review the results at 10:00 am ET.
A live webcast of the conference call will be available online at http://www.arborrealtytrust.com/ in the investor relations area of the Website. Web participants are encouraged to go to the Web site at least 15 minutes prior to the start of the call to register, download, and install any necessary audio software. Listening to the webcast requires speakers and RealPlayer(TM) software, downloadable free at www.real.com. Those without Web access should access the call telephonically at least ten minutes prior to the conference call. The dial-in numbers are (800) 295-3991 for domestic callers and (617) 614-3942 for international callers. Please use participant passcode 31212199.
After the live webcast, the call will remain available on the Company’s Website, www.arborrealtytrust.com, through April 2, 2012. In addition, a telephonic replay of the call will be available until March 9, 2012. The replay dial-in number is (888) 286-8010 for domestic callers and (617) 801-6888 for international callers. Please use passcode 93305361.
About Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.
Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. is a real estate investment trust, which invests in a diversified portfolio of multi-family and commercial real estate related bridge and mezzanine loans, preferred equity investments, mortgage related securities and other real estate related assets. Arbor commenced operations in July 2003 and conducts substantially all of its operations through its operating partnership, Arbor Realty Limited Partnership and its subsidiaries. Arbor is externally managed and advised by Arbor Commercial Mortgage, LLC, a national commercial real estate finance company operating through 14 offices in the U.S. that specializes in debt and equity financing for multi-family and commercial real estate.
Safe Harbor Statement
Certain items in this press release may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based on management’s current expectations and beliefs and are subject to a number of trends and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. Arbor can give no assurance that its expectations will be attained. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from Arbor’s expectations include, but are not limited to, continued ability to source new investments, changes in interest rates and/or credit spreads, changes in the real estate markets, and other risks detailed in Arbor’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 and its other reports filed with the SEC. Such forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this press release. Arbor expressly disclaims any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect any change in Arbor’s expectations with regard thereto or change in events, conditions, or circumstances on which any such statement is based.http://tourism9.cm/ http://vkins.com/
A live webcast of the conference call will be available online at http://www.arborrealtytrust.com/ in the investor relations area of the Website. Web participants are encouraged to go to the Web site at least 15 minutes prior to the start of the call to register, download, and install any necessary audio software. Listening to the webcast requires speakers and RealPlayer(TM) software, downloadable free at www.real.com. Those without Web access should access the call telephonically at least ten minutes prior to the conference call. The dial-in numbers are (800) 295-3991 for domestic callers and (617) 614-3942 for international callers. Please use participant passcode 31212199.
After the live webcast, the call will remain available on the Company’s Website, www.arborrealtytrust.com, through April 2, 2012. In addition, a telephonic replay of the call will be available until March 9, 2012. The replay dial-in number is (888) 286-8010 for domestic callers and (617) 801-6888 for international callers. Please use passcode 93305361.
About Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.
Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. is a real estate investment trust, which invests in a diversified portfolio of multi-family and commercial real estate related bridge and mezzanine loans, preferred equity investments, mortgage related securities and other real estate related assets. Arbor commenced operations in July 2003 and conducts substantially all of its operations through its operating partnership, Arbor Realty Limited Partnership and its subsidiaries. Arbor is externally managed and advised by Arbor Commercial Mortgage, LLC, a national commercial real estate finance company operating through 14 offices in the U.S. that specializes in debt and equity financing for multi-family and commercial real estate.
Safe Harbor Statement
Certain items in this press release may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based on management’s current expectations and beliefs and are subject to a number of trends and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. Arbor can give no assurance that its expectations will be attained. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from Arbor’s expectations include, but are not limited to, continued ability to source new investments, changes in interest rates and/or credit spreads, changes in the real estate markets, and other risks detailed in Arbor’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 and its other reports filed with the SEC. Such forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this press release. Arbor expressly disclaims any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect any change in Arbor’s expectations with regard thereto or change in events, conditions, or circumstances on which any such statement is based.http://tourism9.cm/ http://vkins.com/
UK Private Equity Sector Will Be Unhappy With Pre-Budget Report
08 December 2006
Private equity funds will have good reason to feel disappointed following the Chancellor’s failure to redress the unfair retrospective legislation which will attack their fund returns, claim business and financial advisers Grant Thornton.As a result of restrictions on the deductibility of finance costs in investee companies from April 2007, funds will see a significant increase in tax costs which in many cases could not have been predicted when their investments were made.
Stephen Quest, head of tax transactions at Grant Thornton, comments: “The taxation of private equity funds has been in a state of flux for the last two years. The market needs stability to enable deals to be completed with a degree of certainty. Clarity in this area would have provided a boost to the private equity sector which has brought so much to the British
economy over the last year.”
In light of the unchanged conditions, says Grant Thornton, the major issues facing the private equity market remain the deductibility of interest, withholding tax, and the tax treatment of management teams.
For portfolio companies, the most draconian measure to impact funds is the retrospective application of the transfer pricing regulations to the financing of investee companies. From April 2007, amounts payable to private equity
funds in respect of finance deemed not to be available on an arm’s length basis may not qualify for a deduction for corporation tax relief. The effect on returns is significant and unfair; the new rules can increase the cost of finance by 3-5% for investee companies, despite the fact that at the time finance was put in place no such legislation existed.
Quest says: “We had hoped to see a Pre-Budget in which the Chancellor put this right. His failure to do so will result in private equity funds taking a hit in April. It also sets a dangerous precedent and undermines the basis upon which funds will make investment decisions in the future.”
As regards withholding tax, Grant Thornton says that significant uncertainty exists as to whether withholding tax needs to
operate on interest paid on many international fund structures. This needs to be clarified as soon as possible.
For management teams, the treatment of ratchets remains worrying. AlthoughiIn August 2006, HMRC provided welcome confirmation that the British Venture Capital Association (BVCA) safe harbour would apply to ‘ratchets’
where management teams acquire sweet equity, the Pre-Budget Report has failed to address the thorny issue of post-acquisition changes to ratchets which cause so much difficulty when private equity investments are re-financed.
Grant Thornton says that tax law remains unclear with regard to earn-outs. Quest remarks: “The tax law in this area is in a considerable mess with uncertainty as to whether future receipts are taxed on a current or deferred basis. There is urgent need for a reform in this area.”
Stephen Quest concludes, “Private equity has become a mainstream and permanent factor in capital markets and deserves a fiscal regime that is consistently applied and delivers certainty to the funds in assessing investment opportunities in the UK. It remains the case that there is significant uncertainty and this is disrupting the flow of funds into the UK market. We hope that there will be substantive changes in the next Budget and that the introduction of retrospective attack on pre-2005 investments is dropped.”
http://tourism9.cm/ http://vkins.com/
2012年2月13日星期一
DealBook: Private Equity Industry Attracts S.E.C. Scrutiny
In recent years, the private equity industry has escaped much of the regulatory scrutiny that has been directed toward hedge funds and Wall Street banks. But that appears to be changing.
The Securities and Exchange Commission has begun a broad examination of the private equity industry, seeking information about the business practices of some of the country’s most powerful financial firms.
The S.E.C.’s enforcement unit sent a letter late last year to several private equity funds as part of what it called an “informal inquiry” into the industry, according to two people with direct knowledge of the matter who requested anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss it publicly. It is not clear which firms received the letter.
While the S.E.C. emphasized that the request should not be construed as an indication that it suspected any wrongdoing, its goal in gathering information was to investigate possible violations of securities laws, these people said.
One focus of the inquiry is how private equity firms value their investments and report performance. Unlike the valuing of publicly traded stocks, valuing private equity investments — largely in private companies that are not listed on an exchange — can be a thorny and subjective process.
The S.E.C.’s concern, say people familiar with the government inquiry, is that some private equity funds might overstate the value of their portfolios to attract investors for future funds.
“Private equity firms work hard, with auditors and company managements, to provide accurate valuations of their largely illiquid holdings to their investors,” said Steve Judge, the chief executive of the Private Equity Growth Capital Council, the industry’s trade group.
The S.E.C. inquiry, which was reported earlier by The Wall Street Journal, adds to the increased scrutiny of the private equity industry in Washington and expands the agency’s interest in how financial institutions value their holdings.
While private equity billionaires like Henry R. Kravis and Stephen A. Schwarzman have long made headlines for their audacious deals, the industry has historically received minimal attention from federal lawmakers, in part because private equity clients — typically pension funds and the investment arms of foreign governments — are considered to be more sophisticated than average investors.
The inquiry also comes at a time when private equity has been thrust onto the national stage as a central issue in the presidential election. Mitt Romney, a leading contender for the Republican nomination, earned his fortune running Bain Capital, one of the world’s largest private equity firms.
The industry drew heightened interest during last decade’s buyout boom. Backed by billions of dollars in loans from flush banks, the firms acquired major American companies, including the radio giant Clear Channel Communications, the hospital chain H.C.A. and the automaker Chrysler.
Washington began to pay attention. The favorable tax treatment that private equity executives receive on a large portion of their compensation came under attack. The Justice Department began investigating whether the world’s largest private equity firms colluded to drive down the prices of acquisitions that they teamed up on.
Under the Dodd-Frank financial reform law, most private equity firms must register with the S.E.C. by the end of March. The commission already oversees many firms. The Blackstone Group and Kohlberg Kravis Roberts, for example, are publicly traded companies that provide the commission with detailed financial information.
While the largest private equity shops receive the most publicity, the industry is vast, with several thousand firms and more than $1 trillion in assets under management.
Critics of the industry argue that private equity’s core investment strategy — taking on large amounts of debt to buy companies — too often results in bankruptcies and job losses.
Private equity officials counter that their acquisitions drive economic growth by making companies more competitive. They also boast of delivering superior investment returns to clients, including public pension funds.
The S.E.C inquiry appears less focused on big-picture questions like private equity’s effect on jobs or the companies that it buys. Instead, the commission wants to deepen its understanding of more arcane issues like firms’ fee structures and how they value investments.
Handling the inquiry is the S.E.C.’s enforcement division, which drew criticism for its ineffectiveness as a regulator in the period leading up to the financial crisis. The agency has recently taken a more aggressive public stance, vowing to root out misconduct on Wall Street.
Speaking at a private equity conference last month, Robert B. Kaplan, co-chief of the S.E.C. enforcement division’s newly formed asset management unit, said he thought the private equity industry lacked sufficient oversight and deserved more scrutiny.
One area of focus is portfolio valuation. Private equity managers use varying, complex methodologies to value their holdings, which are often private companies bought using debt. Because there are no easily ascertainable market prices for private companies, subjective judgments play a significant role in their valuation.
While the industry has in recent years provided managers with a framework for valuing their private holdings, even its largest, most sophisticated players acknowledge the complexities involved.
The Carlyle Group, for instance, which has filed for an initial public offering, lists valuation as a “risk factor” in its registration statement with the S.E.C.
“Valuation methodologies for certain assets in our funds can involve subjective judgments,” Carlyle said, “and the fair value of assets established pursuant to such methodologies may be incorrect, which could result in the misstatement of fund performance.”
Private equity funds argue that they are rigorous in their valuation process. Many firms use independent financial advisory firms that specialize in portfolio valuation, like Duff & Phelps.
They also contend that interim valuations are less important to investors in private equity funds than investors in other vehicles like hedge funds. That is because private equity funds earn profits only when they sell a holding. By contrast, hedge fund managers are paid on their gains at the end of each year.
“Because private equity investments are not traded on stock exchanges, investors and company management can focus on creating value over the long term and not on the monthly or quarterly pressures of the public markets,” said Mr. Judge, the chief of the industry trade group.
The valuation of assets has become a main focus of law enforcement authorities, not only at private equity firms but also at hedge funds and Wall Street banks.
Earlier this month, federal prosecutors charged three former Credit Suisse executives with inflating the value of their mortgage-bond holdings to secure higher bonus payouts.
The S.E.C. recently filed several actions against hedge funds as part of an initiative to combat fraudulent valuations and phony returns. The effort — called the “aberrational performance inquiry” — uses what the S.E.C. calls proprietary risk analytics to evaluate hedge fund performance.
In announcing the initiative, the S.E.C. emphasized that it was interested in assessing returns across Wall Street.
“We are applying analytics across the investment adviser space — beyond performance and beyond hedge funds,” the agency said.
http://tourism9.cm/ http://vkins.com/
The Securities and Exchange Commission has begun a broad examination of the private equity industry, seeking information about the business practices of some of the country’s most powerful financial firms.
The S.E.C.’s enforcement unit sent a letter late last year to several private equity funds as part of what it called an “informal inquiry” into the industry, according to two people with direct knowledge of the matter who requested anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss it publicly. It is not clear which firms received the letter.
While the S.E.C. emphasized that the request should not be construed as an indication that it suspected any wrongdoing, its goal in gathering information was to investigate possible violations of securities laws, these people said.
One focus of the inquiry is how private equity firms value their investments and report performance. Unlike the valuing of publicly traded stocks, valuing private equity investments — largely in private companies that are not listed on an exchange — can be a thorny and subjective process.
The S.E.C.’s concern, say people familiar with the government inquiry, is that some private equity funds might overstate the value of their portfolios to attract investors for future funds.
“Private equity firms work hard, with auditors and company managements, to provide accurate valuations of their largely illiquid holdings to their investors,” said Steve Judge, the chief executive of the Private Equity Growth Capital Council, the industry’s trade group.
The S.E.C. inquiry, which was reported earlier by The Wall Street Journal, adds to the increased scrutiny of the private equity industry in Washington and expands the agency’s interest in how financial institutions value their holdings.
While private equity billionaires like Henry R. Kravis and Stephen A. Schwarzman have long made headlines for their audacious deals, the industry has historically received minimal attention from federal lawmakers, in part because private equity clients — typically pension funds and the investment arms of foreign governments — are considered to be more sophisticated than average investors.
The inquiry also comes at a time when private equity has been thrust onto the national stage as a central issue in the presidential election. Mitt Romney, a leading contender for the Republican nomination, earned his fortune running Bain Capital, one of the world’s largest private equity firms.
The industry drew heightened interest during last decade’s buyout boom. Backed by billions of dollars in loans from flush banks, the firms acquired major American companies, including the radio giant Clear Channel Communications, the hospital chain H.C.A. and the automaker Chrysler.
Washington began to pay attention. The favorable tax treatment that private equity executives receive on a large portion of their compensation came under attack. The Justice Department began investigating whether the world’s largest private equity firms colluded to drive down the prices of acquisitions that they teamed up on.
Under the Dodd-Frank financial reform law, most private equity firms must register with the S.E.C. by the end of March. The commission already oversees many firms. The Blackstone Group and Kohlberg Kravis Roberts, for example, are publicly traded companies that provide the commission with detailed financial information.
While the largest private equity shops receive the most publicity, the industry is vast, with several thousand firms and more than $1 trillion in assets under management.
Critics of the industry argue that private equity’s core investment strategy — taking on large amounts of debt to buy companies — too often results in bankruptcies and job losses.
Private equity officials counter that their acquisitions drive economic growth by making companies more competitive. They also boast of delivering superior investment returns to clients, including public pension funds.
The S.E.C inquiry appears less focused on big-picture questions like private equity’s effect on jobs or the companies that it buys. Instead, the commission wants to deepen its understanding of more arcane issues like firms’ fee structures and how they value investments.
Handling the inquiry is the S.E.C.’s enforcement division, which drew criticism for its ineffectiveness as a regulator in the period leading up to the financial crisis. The agency has recently taken a more aggressive public stance, vowing to root out misconduct on Wall Street.
Speaking at a private equity conference last month, Robert B. Kaplan, co-chief of the S.E.C. enforcement division’s newly formed asset management unit, said he thought the private equity industry lacked sufficient oversight and deserved more scrutiny.
One area of focus is portfolio valuation. Private equity managers use varying, complex methodologies to value their holdings, which are often private companies bought using debt. Because there are no easily ascertainable market prices for private companies, subjective judgments play a significant role in their valuation.
While the industry has in recent years provided managers with a framework for valuing their private holdings, even its largest, most sophisticated players acknowledge the complexities involved.
The Carlyle Group, for instance, which has filed for an initial public offering, lists valuation as a “risk factor” in its registration statement with the S.E.C.
“Valuation methodologies for certain assets in our funds can involve subjective judgments,” Carlyle said, “and the fair value of assets established pursuant to such methodologies may be incorrect, which could result in the misstatement of fund performance.”
Private equity funds argue that they are rigorous in their valuation process. Many firms use independent financial advisory firms that specialize in portfolio valuation, like Duff & Phelps.
They also contend that interim valuations are less important to investors in private equity funds than investors in other vehicles like hedge funds. That is because private equity funds earn profits only when they sell a holding. By contrast, hedge fund managers are paid on their gains at the end of each year.
“Because private equity investments are not traded on stock exchanges, investors and company management can focus on creating value over the long term and not on the monthly or quarterly pressures of the public markets,” said Mr. Judge, the chief of the industry trade group.
The valuation of assets has become a main focus of law enforcement authorities, not only at private equity firms but also at hedge funds and Wall Street banks.
Earlier this month, federal prosecutors charged three former Credit Suisse executives with inflating the value of their mortgage-bond holdings to secure higher bonus payouts.
The S.E.C. recently filed several actions against hedge funds as part of an initiative to combat fraudulent valuations and phony returns. The effort — called the “aberrational performance inquiry” — uses what the S.E.C. calls proprietary risk analytics to evaluate hedge fund performance.
In announcing the initiative, the S.E.C. emphasized that it was interested in assessing returns across Wall Street.
“We are applying analytics across the investment adviser space — beyond performance and beyond hedge funds,” the agency said.
http://tourism9.cm/ http://vkins.com/
2012年2月1日星期三
Cohen Said to Plan Donating Gains From SAC Spinout as Investors Flag Risk
Steven A. Cohen plans to donate to charity any profits he makes from the former private-equity arm of the SAC Capital Advisors LP hedge fund, according to three investors.
Some limited partners and prospective investors in Siris Capital Group LLC have expressed concern that the New York-based spinout’s ties with Cohen left it vulnerable to “headline risk,” or negative news, the people said. Two former employees of SAC Capital have pleaded guilty to insider trading in the U.S. government’s five-year probe of hedge funds, and last month a technology analyst at one of the $14 billion firm’s units was accused of the crime.
Prior to the close of the first fundraising stage in September, Cohen decided against investing in the Siris fund, whose general partners are seeking $400 million, the people said. Cohen also decided to hand over his cut of future profits to charity, according to the investors. Siris had agreed at the time of the spinout to give Cohen 20 percent of its slice of profits, or carried interest, from the first fund, the investors said.
Frank Baker, co-founder of Siris, declined to comment, as did Jonathan Gasthalter, a spokesman for SAC Capital at Sard Verbinnen & Co. No allegations of wrongdoing have been levied against Cohen or SAC.
Public pension plans have been sensitive to any bad press around investments they make.
“The nightmare scenario for any public pension manager is getting a call from a board member one morning because a negative story involving a fund in their portfolio is on page one,” said Jake Elmhirst, a managing director at UBS Investment Bank in New York.
Cohen’s decision not to invest in the fund has alleviated concerns about potential headline risk, one of the people said. Another possible limited partner said his investment firm wouldn’t be troubled if Cohen’s had participated in the fund because that would represent a “validation” of the Siris team.
At SAC, Cohen acted as the sole backer of deals by the private-capital group and helped Siris get started.
Siris gathered $125 million in the first phase of fundraising, according to one investor. Teachers’ Retirement System of Illinois committed $45 million in August.
Siris was founded by Baker, Peter Berger and Jeffrey Hendren, who have worked together for more than a decade. They were colleagues at private-equity firm Ripplewood Holdings LLC before joining SAC Capital in 2007.
SAC’s private-capital group invested in Cosmos Bank Taiwan (2837), network infrastructure company Airvana and MedQuist Holdings. The deals have produced an average of about two times invested capital, according to another person familiar with Siris.
To contact the reporter on this story: Sabrina Willmer in New York at swillmer2@bloomberg.net
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Christian Baumgaertel at cbaumgaertel@bloomberg.net
'
'
http://tourism9.com/ http://vkins.com/
Some limited partners and prospective investors in Siris Capital Group LLC have expressed concern that the New York-based spinout’s ties with Cohen left it vulnerable to “headline risk,” or negative news, the people said. Two former employees of SAC Capital have pleaded guilty to insider trading in the U.S. government’s five-year probe of hedge funds, and last month a technology analyst at one of the $14 billion firm’s units was accused of the crime.
Prior to the close of the first fundraising stage in September, Cohen decided against investing in the Siris fund, whose general partners are seeking $400 million, the people said. Cohen also decided to hand over his cut of future profits to charity, according to the investors. Siris had agreed at the time of the spinout to give Cohen 20 percent of its slice of profits, or carried interest, from the first fund, the investors said.
Frank Baker, co-founder of Siris, declined to comment, as did Jonathan Gasthalter, a spokesman for SAC Capital at Sard Verbinnen & Co. No allegations of wrongdoing have been levied against Cohen or SAC.
Siris Fundraising
Siris, the private-capital group that spun off from SAC Capital early last year, has raised $175 million for its first buyout fund, said two of the investors, who asked not to be identified because the information isn’t public. The fund, Siris Partners II LP, will invest in technology, telecommunications and health-care companies.Public pension plans have been sensitive to any bad press around investments they make.
“The nightmare scenario for any public pension manager is getting a call from a board member one morning because a negative story involving a fund in their portfolio is on page one,” said Jake Elmhirst, a managing director at UBS Investment Bank in New York.
Cohen’s decision not to invest in the fund has alleviated concerns about potential headline risk, one of the people said. Another possible limited partner said his investment firm wouldn’t be troubled if Cohen’s had participated in the fund because that would represent a “validation” of the Siris team.
At SAC, Cohen acted as the sole backer of deals by the private-capital group and helped Siris get started.
Siris gathered $125 million in the first phase of fundraising, according to one investor. Teachers’ Retirement System of Illinois committed $45 million in August.
Tekelec, Applied Discovery
In January, Siris led a group that bought Internet services company Tekelec (TKLC) in a deal valued at about $780 million. The firm purchased LexisNexis’s Applied Discovery unit, a provider of electronic legal services, in December.Siris was founded by Baker, Peter Berger and Jeffrey Hendren, who have worked together for more than a decade. They were colleagues at private-equity firm Ripplewood Holdings LLC before joining SAC Capital in 2007.
SAC’s private-capital group invested in Cosmos Bank Taiwan (2837), network infrastructure company Airvana and MedQuist Holdings. The deals have produced an average of about two times invested capital, according to another person familiar with Siris.
To contact the reporter on this story: Sabrina Willmer in New York at swillmer2@bloomberg.net
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Christian Baumgaertel at cbaumgaertel@bloomberg.net
'
'
http://tourism9.com/ http://vkins.com/
2012年1月19日星期四
Smarsh Helps Hedge Funds and Private Equity Firms Prepare for SEC Registration
PORTLAND, Ore.–(BUSINESS WIRE)– Smarsh®, the managed service leader in secure, innovative and reliable email archiving and compliance solutions, is expanding its hedge fund and private equity client roster, as firms prepare for the upcoming SEC registration deadline. Many of the industry’s leading firms are tapping into Smarsh’s experience helping thousands of registered investment advisors meet SEC electronic recordkeeping obligations and navigate SEC registration and oversight. By partnering with Smarsh, these firms can design efficient, cost-effective and secure/maintainable email and electronic messaging compliance policies and processes in advance of SEC registration.
“Beyond just having the measures in place to meet the specific requirements of SEC registration, firms are looking to build a true culture of compliance across their organizations,” said Stephen Marsh, CEO and founder of Smarsh. “They recognize that compliance isn’t just a checkbox, and a robust program will not only minimize the impact of SEC oversight, but also help save time and money in e-discovery, litigation and internal investigations.”
Proactive Approach to Registration Readiness
The Private Fund Investment Advisers Registration Act, Title IV of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, eliminated the private adviser exemption afforded by Section 203(b)(3) of the Advisers Act, requiring many hedge fund and private equity fund managers to register as advisers with either the SEC or state regulatory authorities. With registration, firms will be obliged to meet specific recordkeeping requirements for email, instant messaging, social media and all other forms of electronic business communications, as detailed in SEC 204-2, Investment Advisers Act of 1940: Books & Record Maintenance. The deadline to register is March 30, 2012 and firms must apply for registration by February 14.
With the deadline quickly approaching and many firms putting a formal compliance function in place for the first time, Smarsh has compiled a series of educational resources to help firms understand the specific requirements for electronic communications recordkeeping and best practices for implementing new policies, procedures and technology to fulfill these obligations.
“Many firms don’t know what to expect from SEC oversight, so our goal is to not only provide a service designed specifically to meet electronic recordkeeping, supervision and data protection obligations, but also share insights from our experience helping clients through thousands of successful regulatory examinations and e-discovery requests,” added Marsh.
Support for Firms Registering for the First Time
As part of Smarsh’s efforts to ensure a smooth transition to SEC registration, Steve Marsh will moderate a panel discussion with industry representatives on the topic: Creating a Culture of Compliance: Your SEC Registration Checklist. The event will be held in New York City at the Four Seasons Hotel on Thursday, January 26th. For additional information or to register, contact Jessica Heath at jheath@smarsh.com or 503-946-5970.
Additional Smarsh resources for hedge funds and private equity funds are available at www.smarsh.com/privatefunds.
About Smarsh
Smarsh® provides hosted solutions for archiving electronic communications, including email, instant messaging and social media platforms such as Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter. Founded in 2001, Smarsh helps organizations manage and enforce flexible, secure and cost-effective compliance and records retention strategies. For more information, visit www.smarsh.com or follow Smarsh at www.twitter.com/SmarshInc.
http://tourism9.com/ http://vkins.com/
“Beyond just having the measures in place to meet the specific requirements of SEC registration, firms are looking to build a true culture of compliance across their organizations,” said Stephen Marsh, CEO and founder of Smarsh. “They recognize that compliance isn’t just a checkbox, and a robust program will not only minimize the impact of SEC oversight, but also help save time and money in e-discovery, litigation and internal investigations.”
Proactive Approach to Registration Readiness
The Private Fund Investment Advisers Registration Act, Title IV of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, eliminated the private adviser exemption afforded by Section 203(b)(3) of the Advisers Act, requiring many hedge fund and private equity fund managers to register as advisers with either the SEC or state regulatory authorities. With registration, firms will be obliged to meet specific recordkeeping requirements for email, instant messaging, social media and all other forms of electronic business communications, as detailed in SEC 204-2, Investment Advisers Act of 1940: Books & Record Maintenance. The deadline to register is March 30, 2012 and firms must apply for registration by February 14.
With the deadline quickly approaching and many firms putting a formal compliance function in place for the first time, Smarsh has compiled a series of educational resources to help firms understand the specific requirements for electronic communications recordkeeping and best practices for implementing new policies, procedures and technology to fulfill these obligations.
“Many firms don’t know what to expect from SEC oversight, so our goal is to not only provide a service designed specifically to meet electronic recordkeeping, supervision and data protection obligations, but also share insights from our experience helping clients through thousands of successful regulatory examinations and e-discovery requests,” added Marsh.
Support for Firms Registering for the First Time
As part of Smarsh’s efforts to ensure a smooth transition to SEC registration, Steve Marsh will moderate a panel discussion with industry representatives on the topic: Creating a Culture of Compliance: Your SEC Registration Checklist. The event will be held in New York City at the Four Seasons Hotel on Thursday, January 26th. For additional information or to register, contact Jessica Heath at jheath@smarsh.com or 503-946-5970.
Additional Smarsh resources for hedge funds and private equity funds are available at www.smarsh.com/privatefunds.
About Smarsh
Smarsh® provides hosted solutions for archiving electronic communications, including email, instant messaging and social media platforms such as Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter. Founded in 2001, Smarsh helps organizations manage and enforce flexible, secure and cost-effective compliance and records retention strategies. For more information, visit www.smarsh.com or follow Smarsh at www.twitter.com/SmarshInc.
http://tourism9.com/ http://vkins.com/
2012年1月15日星期日
Q&A: Private-equity returns and the Carlyle Group
What did you think of the compensation and share of the profits paid to the three founders of the Carlyle Group, and did they deserve it?
Obviously, $400 million — the amount the founders earned — is a large amount of money.
But they earned it because compensation is heavily tied to performance in private equity.
Carlyle returned at least $15 billion to its investors this year. The $15 billion represents the [very successful] performance of Carlyle’s investments in companies over the last five to 10 years.
And $400 million is less than 3 percent of the $15 billion. In years that Carlyle does not return money to its investors, like 2009, the founders earn far, far less.
My guess is that the investors in the Carlyle funds are extremely happy with the returns they have received this year even after paying the fees.
Discuss the private business model by which people can earn that kind of money.
The big investors in private equity are pension funds and endowments. In Carlyle’s case, those investors include the Maryland State Retirement and Pension System, the New York State Teachers’ Retirement System and Calpers [the California Public Employees’ Retirement System]. When private-equity fund returns are strong, a lot of pensioners and workers benefit.
Private-equity funds take this capital and use it to buy companies. When the private-equity funds buy the companies, they often use leverage, hence the common name of leveraged buyouts. These days, the leverage is usually on the order of 60 or 70 percent of the purchase price — less than the leverage in most home purchases.
The private-equity funds then work very hard to increase the value of the company. Usually, this involves looking for ways to increase the growth of the business as well as cutting costs. If the values of the companies increase, the private-equity fund and its investors will make money (when the companies are sold). If the values decrease, the private-equity fund and its investors lose money.
Private-equity funds receive an annual management fee on the money invested. For large funds, this is usually 1.5 percent per year. In addition, private-equity funds typically receive 20 percent of the profit of their investments. The founders earned so much this year because they had an unusually profitable year. (It is worth adding that funds get this share of the profits only if their investors earn at least an 8 percent annual return.)
Overall, the performance of private-equity funds has been very strong over the past 20 years. On average, each dollar invested in one has returned 27 percent more than that same dollar would have earned in the S&P 500 or other public-equity fund.
Please explain carried interest and why it is taxed at a lower rate than income tax.
The carried interest is the 20 percent share of investment profits I mentioned above. It is taxed at capital gains rates rather than ordinary income tax rates. That has been the case for a very long time.
There is a lot of debate about whether this is appropriate. Some argue that carried interest is compensation and should be taxed as ordinary income.
The counterargument is that the carried interest represents an investment return and should be taxed like other equity investments. If the carried interest were taxed as ordinary income, I think it also is likely that private-equity firms would be able to avoid much of the tax increase by restructuring the carried interest into equity investments.
Who invests in private equity and how does it work?
As mentioned above, the big investors in private equity are pension funds and endowments.
Do private-equity firms create jobs, destroy jobs or neither?
The best empirical evidence says the answer is that private equity both creates and eliminates jobs. After a buyout, employment in existing operations tends to decline relative to other companies in the same industry by about 3 percent. (This may mean employment actually grows, but just by less than at other companies). At the same time, employment in new operations tends to increase by more than other companies in the same industry by more than 2 percent. Net job losses were relatively greater in retail buyouts. This is not surprising, given that Wal-mart and Amazon have put a great deal of pressure on retailers over the past 20 years. If retail buyouts are not included, it is likely that net employment growth was positive. In other words, there does not seem to be a large net employment effect. That is not to say, however, that some people do not lose jobs. The overall pattern suggests that private-equity firms make firms more productive. They make cuts or grow more slowly when that makes sense, and they invest and grow more quickly when that makes sense.
Obviously, $400 million — the amount the founders earned — is a large amount of money.
But they earned it because compensation is heavily tied to performance in private equity.
Carlyle returned at least $15 billion to its investors this year. The $15 billion represents the [very successful] performance of Carlyle’s investments in companies over the last five to 10 years.
And $400 million is less than 3 percent of the $15 billion. In years that Carlyle does not return money to its investors, like 2009, the founders earn far, far less.
My guess is that the investors in the Carlyle funds are extremely happy with the returns they have received this year even after paying the fees.
Discuss the private business model by which people can earn that kind of money.
The big investors in private equity are pension funds and endowments. In Carlyle’s case, those investors include the Maryland State Retirement and Pension System, the New York State Teachers’ Retirement System and Calpers [the California Public Employees’ Retirement System]. When private-equity fund returns are strong, a lot of pensioners and workers benefit.
Private-equity funds take this capital and use it to buy companies. When the private-equity funds buy the companies, they often use leverage, hence the common name of leveraged buyouts. These days, the leverage is usually on the order of 60 or 70 percent of the purchase price — less than the leverage in most home purchases.
The private-equity funds then work very hard to increase the value of the company. Usually, this involves looking for ways to increase the growth of the business as well as cutting costs. If the values of the companies increase, the private-equity fund and its investors will make money (when the companies are sold). If the values decrease, the private-equity fund and its investors lose money.
Private-equity funds receive an annual management fee on the money invested. For large funds, this is usually 1.5 percent per year. In addition, private-equity funds typically receive 20 percent of the profit of their investments. The founders earned so much this year because they had an unusually profitable year. (It is worth adding that funds get this share of the profits only if their investors earn at least an 8 percent annual return.)
Overall, the performance of private-equity funds has been very strong over the past 20 years. On average, each dollar invested in one has returned 27 percent more than that same dollar would have earned in the S&P 500 or other public-equity fund.
Please explain carried interest and why it is taxed at a lower rate than income tax.
The carried interest is the 20 percent share of investment profits I mentioned above. It is taxed at capital gains rates rather than ordinary income tax rates. That has been the case for a very long time.
There is a lot of debate about whether this is appropriate. Some argue that carried interest is compensation and should be taxed as ordinary income.
The counterargument is that the carried interest represents an investment return and should be taxed like other equity investments. If the carried interest were taxed as ordinary income, I think it also is likely that private-equity firms would be able to avoid much of the tax increase by restructuring the carried interest into equity investments.
Who invests in private equity and how does it work?
As mentioned above, the big investors in private equity are pension funds and endowments.
Do private-equity firms create jobs, destroy jobs or neither?
The best empirical evidence says the answer is that private equity both creates and eliminates jobs. After a buyout, employment in existing operations tends to decline relative to other companies in the same industry by about 3 percent. (This may mean employment actually grows, but just by less than at other companies). At the same time, employment in new operations tends to increase by more than other companies in the same industry by more than 2 percent. Net job losses were relatively greater in retail buyouts. This is not surprising, given that Wal-mart and Amazon have put a great deal of pressure on retailers over the past 20 years. If retail buyouts are not included, it is likely that net employment growth was positive. In other words, there does not seem to be a large net employment effect. That is not to say, however, that some people do not lose jobs. The overall pattern suggests that private-equity firms make firms more productive. They make cuts or grow more slowly when that makes sense, and they invest and grow more quickly when that makes sense.
2012年1月13日星期五
O'Malley proposes extra $15 million to help build rental housing, create jobs
Gov. Martin O’Malley is proposing a $15 million increase in the state’s program to help build affordable rental housing, saying the bump would leverage $285 million in private investment and create 1,100 jobs in Maryland.
Surrounded by housing advocates, construction workers and local residents, O’Malley went to the site of a former public housing development in Annapolis to announce plans to double the state’s investment in loans to developers to help spur rental housing construction.
The governor said the increased spending would help address a shortage of affordable housing by providing gap financing for about 20 privately owned rental developments in the next fiscal year. But his emphasis was on the employment the money would bring.
“This announcement here today is about creating jobs,” O’Malley said at the site where the privately owned Obery Court complex is under construction with the help of existing state spending. “This is a time to go out in the market and try and put our people back to work.”
Senate Minority Leader E.J. Pipkin disagreed, saying the initiative “doesn’t make any sense.”
“We’re seeing more and more dollars going into things the private sector should be doing,” the Upper Shore Republican said.
The administration said it has maintained state spending on affordable housing programs at $15.5 million a year despite budget pressures. O’Malley is proposing to nearly double that to $30.5 million through what the administration is calling its “Rental Housing Works” initiative. The new state money would help offset the loss of federal stimulus funds, housing officials said.
The announcement comes at a time when the state is facing a $1.1 billion shortfall in its general fund budget — a gap that must by law be closed.
O’Malley said the additional housing money would be part of the capital budget. The extra spending would be financed through additional borrowing but would not push borrowing beyond Maryland’s debt guidelines, he said.
Like all of the governor’s budget proposals, the housing plan is subject to General Assembly approval. “I think the legislature will keep it intact,” O’Malley said.
State officials say there is a severe lack of affordable housing in Maryland, with the shortage expected to reach 127,000 units in 2015. Andy DeVilbiss, spokesman for the state Department of Housing and Community Development, said the Rental Housing Works program would use the $15 million for “shovel-ready” projects.
Housing Secretary Raymond A. Skinner said the money is typically used to provide gap financing to make up the difference between what a developer can raise through the private sector and the cost of the project. He said the state loan for an individual project is typically about $1 million to $1.5 million.
While Skinner said each $1 in state lending leverages $19 in private funding, the developer of Obery Court gave more a conservative estimate for that project.
Mark Dambly, president of Pennrose Properties, said the three phases of the project will cost about $39 million, about $8 million of which will come from the loan program. He said the project, the second phase of which is now under construction, will build 175 to 180 units and create 900 jobs.
The governor’s announcement drew praise from housing activists.
“This is a big deal for us,” said Trudy McFall, president of the Maryland Affordable Housing Coalition. “Federal resources are down. We were facing a very grim year ahead of being able to do just a handful of projects. Now this will allow us to do 20 new rental communities.”
McFall emphasized that the projects the new spending will spur are not public housing. “It’s housing that’s developed by the private sector. It’s owned and managed by the private sector,” she said. Typical monthly rents are about $500 to $700 for a two- or three-bedroom unit, McFall said.
michael.dresser@baltsun.com
Surrounded by housing advocates, construction workers and local residents, O’Malley went to the site of a former public housing development in Annapolis to announce plans to double the state’s investment in loans to developers to help spur rental housing construction.
The governor said the increased spending would help address a shortage of affordable housing by providing gap financing for about 20 privately owned rental developments in the next fiscal year. But his emphasis was on the employment the money would bring.
“This announcement here today is about creating jobs,” O’Malley said at the site where the privately owned Obery Court complex is under construction with the help of existing state spending. “This is a time to go out in the market and try and put our people back to work.”
Senate Minority Leader E.J. Pipkin disagreed, saying the initiative “doesn’t make any sense.”
“We’re seeing more and more dollars going into things the private sector should be doing,” the Upper Shore Republican said.
The administration said it has maintained state spending on affordable housing programs at $15.5 million a year despite budget pressures. O’Malley is proposing to nearly double that to $30.5 million through what the administration is calling its “Rental Housing Works” initiative. The new state money would help offset the loss of federal stimulus funds, housing officials said.
The announcement comes at a time when the state is facing a $1.1 billion shortfall in its general fund budget — a gap that must by law be closed.
O’Malley said the additional housing money would be part of the capital budget. The extra spending would be financed through additional borrowing but would not push borrowing beyond Maryland’s debt guidelines, he said.
Like all of the governor’s budget proposals, the housing plan is subject to General Assembly approval. “I think the legislature will keep it intact,” O’Malley said.
State officials say there is a severe lack of affordable housing in Maryland, with the shortage expected to reach 127,000 units in 2015. Andy DeVilbiss, spokesman for the state Department of Housing and Community Development, said the Rental Housing Works program would use the $15 million for “shovel-ready” projects.
Housing Secretary Raymond A. Skinner said the money is typically used to provide gap financing to make up the difference between what a developer can raise through the private sector and the cost of the project. He said the state loan for an individual project is typically about $1 million to $1.5 million.
While Skinner said each $1 in state lending leverages $19 in private funding, the developer of Obery Court gave more a conservative estimate for that project.
Mark Dambly, president of Pennrose Properties, said the three phases of the project will cost about $39 million, about $8 million of which will come from the loan program. He said the project, the second phase of which is now under construction, will build 175 to 180 units and create 900 jobs.
The governor’s announcement drew praise from housing activists.
“This is a big deal for us,” said Trudy McFall, president of the Maryland Affordable Housing Coalition. “Federal resources are down. We were facing a very grim year ahead of being able to do just a handful of projects. Now this will allow us to do 20 new rental communities.”
McFall emphasized that the projects the new spending will spur are not public housing. “It’s housing that’s developed by the private sector. It’s owned and managed by the private sector,” she said. Typical monthly rents are about $500 to $700 for a two- or three-bedroom unit, McFall said.
michael.dresser@baltsun.com
2012年1月12日星期四
The Love Affair Between Politicians And Private Equity
Image via WikipediaAs Mitt Romney knows well, private equity and politics don’t always mix well during election season. The front runner for the Republican presidential nomination has been under attack from his Republican rivals because of his private equity roots. Newt Gingrich’s super PAC is releasing a short movie that attacks Romney for controversial private equity deals. “I am totally for capitalism,” Newt Gingrich recently said, “I do draw a distinction between [it] and looting a company.” Rick Perry has called Romney’s past private equity life a form of “vulture capitalism.”
But the fact is that politicians, both Republicans and Democrats, love the private equity industry. When Romney ran Bain Capital he was constantly searching for what private equity guys like to call an exit, which means selling a company for a big return. For a long time in Washington, the richest exit has been landing at a private equity firm, or in some cases, a hedge fund that makes private equity-like investments. Romney is only unique because he moved from the buyout business into politics and not the other way around.
The recent attacks on Romney have led to the inevitable debate about whether private equity is good for America. But there can be no debate about whether private equity is good for politicians once they leave the political arena. The New York Times recently highlighted the fact that Newt Gingrich himself was on the advisory board of Forstmann Little, a pioneering private equity firm. The truth is it is tough to find a former prominent politician who has not joined the private equity club.
In addition to Clinton, there is former Vice President Dan Quayle, who is chairman for global investments at Cerberus Capital Management, where former U.S. Treasury Secretary John Snow is chairman. Evan Bayh, the former Democratic Indiana senator and governor, is a senior advisor at Apollo Global Management. Rudy Giuliani was chairman of the advisory board of a Leeds Weld private equity fund, which was partly headed by former Massachusetts Governor William Weld. That private equity firm is now known as Leeds Equity Partners and the chair of its advisory board is Colin Powell. Two former U.S. education secretaries are also there.
David Stockman, a former congressman from Michigan and Ronald Reagan’s budget director, joined a private equity shop and eventually founded his own big-time private equity firm. Things did not work out for Stockman at Heartland Industrial Partners. He was indicted in connection with his role at a failed auto parts company, even though the federal government later dropped the charges.
Blackstone, the world’s biggest private equity firm, was co-founded by Pete Peterson, who was Secretary of Commerce during the Nixon Administration. Then there is the Carlyle Group, another massive private equity firm that has long been part of Washington mythology. Former President George H. W. Bush, former Secretary of State James Baker, former Defense Secretary Frank Carlucci, former Securities & Exchange Commission Chairman Arthur Levitt, and Bill Clinton’s White House chief of staff Mack McLarty, have all worked for Carlyle.
The private equity industry is one of the most lucrative places to work in America today. Buyout barons make huge political contributions. It is really hard to see this close relationship ending anytime soon.
http://tourism9.com/
2012年1月10日星期二
dar Education Lending Announces an Initiative to Help Colleges Provide Private Student Loan Consolidation Options to …
Cedar Education Lending announced that it is working with College Financial Aid and Alumni Offices to help spread the word about Private Student Loan Consolidations to recent graduates.
New York, NY (PRWEB) January 10, 2012
Cedar Education Lending announced that it is working with College Financial Aid and Alumni Offices to help spread the word about Private Student Loan Consolidations to recent graduates.
“Financial Aid offices at colleges and universities throughout the country do a terrific job advising students of Federal loan programs, grant-aid, scholarships, private loan and other financial aid opportunities,” said Ms. Samantha Karageorge, Cedar’s CMO. “Prior to graduating, students often have the chance to meet with their Financial Aid Office to discuss their outstanding Federal loans and repayment responsibilities upon graduation. This often is not the case with their Private Student Loans. Furthermore, most colleges don’t provide information or advice to recent graduates about the availability of Private Student Consolidation Loans like those offered by Cedar Education Lending.”
More specifically, Cedar has already begun working with a number of Alumni offices to include information about Private Student Loan Consolidations in the services and benefits sections on their websites, including advice, consolidation loan calculators, and links that would enable graduating students or recent graduates to better understand their options in regard to Federal and Private Consolidation Loans. This initiative will enable students to better plan for their financial future and make navigating the process a lot easier.
###
Samantha Karageorge
Cedar Education Lending
201-321-9932
Email Information
http://tourism9.com/
New York, NY (PRWEB) January 10, 2012
Cedar Education Lending announced that it is working with College Financial Aid and Alumni Offices to help spread the word about Private Student Loan Consolidations to recent graduates.
“Financial Aid offices at colleges and universities throughout the country do a terrific job advising students of Federal loan programs, grant-aid, scholarships, private loan and other financial aid opportunities,” said Ms. Samantha Karageorge, Cedar’s CMO. “Prior to graduating, students often have the chance to meet with their Financial Aid Office to discuss their outstanding Federal loans and repayment responsibilities upon graduation. This often is not the case with their Private Student Loans. Furthermore, most colleges don’t provide information or advice to recent graduates about the availability of Private Student Consolidation Loans like those offered by Cedar Education Lending.”
More specifically, Cedar has already begun working with a number of Alumni offices to include information about Private Student Loan Consolidations in the services and benefits sections on their websites, including advice, consolidation loan calculators, and links that would enable graduating students or recent graduates to better understand their options in regard to Federal and Private Consolidation Loans. This initiative will enable students to better plan for their financial future and make navigating the process a lot easier.
###
Samantha Karageorge
Cedar Education Lending
201-321-9932
Email Information
http://tourism9.com/
2012年1月6日星期五
Transgenomic Announces $3 Million Convertible Note Financing
OMAHA, Neb.–(BUSINESS WIRE)– Transgenomic, Inc. (OTCBB: TBIO.OB – News) today announced that it has entered into a Convertible Promissory Note Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) in the aggregate amount of $3.0 million with entities (the “Investors”) associated with Third Security, LLC, a leading life sciences investment firm.
“We are very pleased with the additional investment by Third Security affiliates as it increases our working capital and allows us to continue our expansion plan,” said Craig Tuttle, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company.
Neither the Notes nor the equity securities into which the Notes are convertible have been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”) and applicable state securities laws, but have been offered and sold in the United States pursuant to applicable exemptions from registration requirements under the Act and applicable state securities laws.
This press release does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any securities. There shall not be any sale of these securities in any jurisdiction in which such offering would be unlawful.
About Transgenomic
Transgenomic, Inc. (www.transgenomic.com) is a global biotechnology company advancing personalized medicine in cancer and inherited diseases through its proprietary molecular technologies and world-class clinical and research services. The Company has three complementary business divisions: Transgenomic Pharmacogenomic Services is a contract research laboratory that specializes in supporting all phases of pre-clinical and clinical trials for oncology drugs in development. Transgenomic Clinical Laboratories specializes in molecular diagnostics for cardiology, neurology, mitochondrial disorders, and oncology. Transgenomic Diagnostic Tools produces equipment, reagents, and other consumables that empower clinical and research applications in molecular testing and cytogenetics. Transgenomic believes there is significant opportunity for continued growth across all three businesses by leveraging their synergistic capabilities, technologies, and expertise. The Company actively develops and acquires new technology and other intellectual property that strengthen its leadership in personalized medicine.
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements in this press release constitute “forward-looking statements” of Transgenomic within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such statements. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, those with respect to management’s current views and estimates of future economic circumstances, industry conditions, company performance and financial results, including the ability of the Company to grow its involvement in the diagnostic products and services markets. The known risks, uncertainties and other factors affecting these forward-looking statements are described from time to time in Transgenomic’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Any change in such factors, risks and uncertainties may cause the actual results, events and performance to differ materially from those referred to in such statements. Accordingly, the Company claims the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 with respect to all statements contained in this press release. All information in this press release is as of the date of the release and Transgenomic does not undertake any duty to update this information, including any forward-looking statements, unless required by law.
http://tourism9.com/
“We are very pleased with the additional investment by Third Security affiliates as it increases our working capital and allows us to continue our expansion plan,” said Craig Tuttle, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company.
Neither the Notes nor the equity securities into which the Notes are convertible have been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”) and applicable state securities laws, but have been offered and sold in the United States pursuant to applicable exemptions from registration requirements under the Act and applicable state securities laws.
This press release does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any securities. There shall not be any sale of these securities in any jurisdiction in which such offering would be unlawful.
About Transgenomic
Transgenomic, Inc. (www.transgenomic.com) is a global biotechnology company advancing personalized medicine in cancer and inherited diseases through its proprietary molecular technologies and world-class clinical and research services. The Company has three complementary business divisions: Transgenomic Pharmacogenomic Services is a contract research laboratory that specializes in supporting all phases of pre-clinical and clinical trials for oncology drugs in development. Transgenomic Clinical Laboratories specializes in molecular diagnostics for cardiology, neurology, mitochondrial disorders, and oncology. Transgenomic Diagnostic Tools produces equipment, reagents, and other consumables that empower clinical and research applications in molecular testing and cytogenetics. Transgenomic believes there is significant opportunity for continued growth across all three businesses by leveraging their synergistic capabilities, technologies, and expertise. The Company actively develops and acquires new technology and other intellectual property that strengthen its leadership in personalized medicine.
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements in this press release constitute “forward-looking statements” of Transgenomic within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such statements. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, those with respect to management’s current views and estimates of future economic circumstances, industry conditions, company performance and financial results, including the ability of the Company to grow its involvement in the diagnostic products and services markets. The known risks, uncertainties and other factors affecting these forward-looking statements are described from time to time in Transgenomic’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Any change in such factors, risks and uncertainties may cause the actual results, events and performance to differ materially from those referred to in such statements. Accordingly, the Company claims the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 with respect to all statements contained in this press release. All information in this press release is as of the date of the release and Transgenomic does not undertake any duty to update this information, including any forward-looking statements, unless required by law.
http://tourism9.com/
2012年1月4日星期三
Blackdog Resources Ltd. Closes Non-Brokered Flow-Through Financing and Updates Buck Lake Operations
CALGARY, ALBERTA–(Marketwire – Jan. 4, 2012) – Blackdog Resources Ltd. (“Blackdog” or “The Company”) (TSX VENTURE:DOG) is pleased to announce that it closed the second tranche of its flow through financing (the “Private Placement”) on December 30, 2011. In aggregate, the Company issued 2,472,931 Common Shares on a “flow -through” basis under the Income Tax Act (Canada) (“Flow-Through Shares”) at a price of $0.48 per share for gross proceeds of $1,187,006.88. All Flow-Through Shares pursuant to the Private Placement are subject to a four-month hold period from the date of issuance.
In connection with the Private Placement, the Company paid certain eligible investment professionals an aggregate of $58,012.25 in finder’s fees and issued 120,754 share purchase warrants (“Broker Warrants”), each such Broker Warrant exercisable for one common share of Blackdog at a price of $0.48 per share for one year from the date of issue.
Proceeds from the Private Placement will be used to incur eligible flow-through expenditures to advance the Company’s light oil properties in Alberta including but not limited to its Pembina Horizontal Cardium play, Evi Slave Lake horizontal play and Leduc Reef D3 play.
The Company also announces that the completion and testing process on its horizontal cardium well at Buck Lake, Alberta has commenced. The well has been fracture stimulated and is currently undergoing a flow test period. The Company has a 15% working interest in the well and in the entire 3/4 section of land the well is situated on, subject to a 12% non-convertible gross overriding royalty.
The Company further announces that during the month of December 2011, an aggregate of 118,963 broker warrants were exercised at $0.36 per share for total proceeds to the Company of $42,826.28. The broker warrants exercised were issued in connection with the Company’s non brokered Flow-Through Share private placement which closed in December, 2010.
Blackdog Resources Ltd. is a junior oil and gas company focused on the development of medium and light oil properties in South-East Saskatchewan and Alberta. The Company has 27,166,212 common shares outstanding.
NEITHER THE TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE NOR ITS REGULATION SERVICES PROVIDER (AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED IN THE POLICIES OF THE TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE) ACCEPTS RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THIS RELEASE.
http://tourism9.com/
In connection with the Private Placement, the Company paid certain eligible investment professionals an aggregate of $58,012.25 in finder’s fees and issued 120,754 share purchase warrants (“Broker Warrants”), each such Broker Warrant exercisable for one common share of Blackdog at a price of $0.48 per share for one year from the date of issue.
Proceeds from the Private Placement will be used to incur eligible flow-through expenditures to advance the Company’s light oil properties in Alberta including but not limited to its Pembina Horizontal Cardium play, Evi Slave Lake horizontal play and Leduc Reef D3 play.
The Company also announces that the completion and testing process on its horizontal cardium well at Buck Lake, Alberta has commenced. The well has been fracture stimulated and is currently undergoing a flow test period. The Company has a 15% working interest in the well and in the entire 3/4 section of land the well is situated on, subject to a 12% non-convertible gross overriding royalty.
The Company further announces that during the month of December 2011, an aggregate of 118,963 broker warrants were exercised at $0.36 per share for total proceeds to the Company of $42,826.28. The broker warrants exercised were issued in connection with the Company’s non brokered Flow-Through Share private placement which closed in December, 2010.
Blackdog Resources Ltd. is a junior oil and gas company focused on the development of medium and light oil properties in South-East Saskatchewan and Alberta. The Company has 27,166,212 common shares outstanding.
NEITHER THE TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE NOR ITS REGULATION SERVICES PROVIDER (AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED IN THE POLICIES OF THE TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE) ACCEPTS RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THIS RELEASE.
http://tourism9.com/
2012年1月3日星期二
Intervale Capital Raises $63M for Private Equity Fund – cbl
More Topics:
Posted January 3, 2012
Charles CheringtonBy Bill Murphy
CAMBRIDGE, Mass. – Intervale Capital has raised $63 million, or about 18 percent of a $350 million private equity fund, from seven investors, according to an SEC filing.
Principals named in the filing by the Cambridge-based fund that focuses on investments in energy firms are:
· Managing partner Charles Cherington; and
· Partner Erich Horsley.
The company said it would pay an affiliate up to $2 million from the proceeds towards annual management fee. It also expects to pay a sales commission of up to $157,500.
Currently, Intervale Capital manages a $280 million private equity fund that invests in oilfield service and manufacturing companies. It has investments in 10 companies.
Reg D filing: http://tinyurl.com/6vvzyje
Also, at citybizlist see:
Intervale Capital Signs Office Lease in Cambridge, MA
Intervale Capital Promotes Erich Horsley to Partner
Bios from Intervale Capital site:
Charles Cherington
Managing Partner
Charles co-founded Intervale Capital to build on the success of Cherington Capital, a private equity firm focused on investments in middle market energy companies. Prior to founding Cherington Capital, Charles co-founded a smaller fund which also focused on middle market buyouts. Charles has over fifteen years of private equity experience.
Before launching his first fund, Charles spent several years as a vice president at the Vietnam Fund, a British private equity fund. Charles also worked for CS First Boston in New York and Vietnam.
Charles earned an M.B.A., with honors, from the University of Chicago and a B.A. in History from Wesleyan University.
Erich Horsley
Partner
Erich started his private equity career in 1998, and has focused exclusively on buyouts of middle-market companies. Erich served as a Principal at Watermill Ventures, a private equity group based in Waltham, MA. He also served as a Vice President at a Boston-based private equity firm with $1.4 billion under management. Erich has spent most of his private equity career executing transactions and overseeing growth in industrial and energy-related businesses.
Erich was a Financial Analyst in the Corporate Finance Department of Morgan Stanley in New York and in Frankfurt, Germany from 1994 to 1996.
Erich received his B.A. in Psychology and English, with honors, from Harvard College and his M.B.A. from Harvard Business School.
blog comments powered by
http://tourism9.com/
Posted January 3, 2012
Charles CheringtonCAMBRIDGE, Mass. – Intervale Capital has raised $63 million, or about 18 percent of a $350 million private equity fund, from seven investors, according to an SEC filing.
Principals named in the filing by the Cambridge-based fund that focuses on investments in energy firms are:
· Managing partner Charles Cherington; and
· Partner Erich Horsley.
The company said it would pay an affiliate up to $2 million from the proceeds towards annual management fee. It also expects to pay a sales commission of up to $157,500.
Currently, Intervale Capital manages a $280 million private equity fund that invests in oilfield service and manufacturing companies. It has investments in 10 companies.
Reg D filing: http://tinyurl.com/6vvzyje
Also, at citybizlist see:
Intervale Capital Signs Office Lease in Cambridge, MA
Intervale Capital Promotes Erich Horsley to Partner
Bios from Intervale Capital site:
Charles Cherington
Managing Partner
Charles co-founded Intervale Capital to build on the success of Cherington Capital, a private equity firm focused on investments in middle market energy companies. Prior to founding Cherington Capital, Charles co-founded a smaller fund which also focused on middle market buyouts. Charles has over fifteen years of private equity experience.
Before launching his first fund, Charles spent several years as a vice president at the Vietnam Fund, a British private equity fund. Charles also worked for CS First Boston in New York and Vietnam.
Charles earned an M.B.A., with honors, from the University of Chicago and a B.A. in History from Wesleyan University.
Erich Horsley
Partner
Erich started his private equity career in 1998, and has focused exclusively on buyouts of middle-market companies. Erich served as a Principal at Watermill Ventures, a private equity group based in Waltham, MA. He also served as a Vice President at a Boston-based private equity firm with $1.4 billion under management. Erich has spent most of his private equity career executing transactions and overseeing growth in industrial and energy-related businesses.
Erich was a Financial Analyst in the Corporate Finance Department of Morgan Stanley in New York and in Frankfurt, Germany from 1994 to 1996.
Erich received his B.A. in Psychology and English, with honors, from Harvard College and his M.B.A. from Harvard Business School.
To find out more about the company in this article and to see if you
have business connections, click below:
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.have business connections, click below:
blog comments powered by
http://tourism9.com/
2012年1月2日星期一
Triangle Capital Corporation Invests $8.0 Million in WorkForce Software, Inc.
RALEIGH, N.C., Dec. 6, 2011 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Triangle Capital Corporation (NYSE:TCAP – News) (“Triangle” or the “Company”), a leading specialty finance company that provides customized financing solutions to lower middle market companies located throughout the United States, today announced that it closed an $8.0 million investment in WorkForce Software, Inc. (“WorkForce”) as part of a $17.0 million growth transaction. Triangle’s investment consisted of subordinated debt and equity. WorkForce provides enterprise clients with software solutions to manage employee time and labor schedules, control and manage employee absences, create employee schedules, and track employee compliance.
About Triangle Capital Corporation
Triangle Capital Corporation (www.TCAP.com) is a specialty finance company organized to provide customized financing solutions to lower middle market companies located throughout the United States. Triangle’s investment objective is to seek attractive returns by generating current income from debt investments and capital appreciation from equity related investments. Triangle’s investment philosophy is to partner with business owners, management teams and financial sponsors to provide flexible financing solutions to fund growth, changes of control, or other corporate events. Triangle typically invests $5.0 million – $20.0 million per transaction in companies with annual revenues between $20.0 million and $100.0 million and EBITDA between $3.0 million and $20.0 million.
Triangle has elected to be treated as a business development company under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“1940 Act”). Triangle is required to comply with a series of regulatory requirements under the 1940 Act as well as applicable NYSE, federal and state laws and regulations. Triangle has elected to be treated as a regulated investment company under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Failure to comply with any of the laws and regulations that apply to Triangle could have a material adverse effect on Triangle and its stockholders.
Forward Looking Statements
This press release may contain forward looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Any such statements, other than statements of historical fact, are likely to be affected by other unknowable future events and conditions, including elements of the future that are or are not under the Company’s control, and that the Company may or may not have considered; accordingly, such statements cannot be guarantees or assurances of any aspect of future performance. Actual developments and results are highly likely to vary materially from these estimates and projections of the future and some of these uncertainties are enumerated in Triangle’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements are included in our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K, each as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Copies are available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Such statements speak only as of the time when made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update any such statement now or in the future
http://tourism9.com/
About Triangle Capital Corporation
Triangle Capital Corporation (www.TCAP.com) is a specialty finance company organized to provide customized financing solutions to lower middle market companies located throughout the United States. Triangle’s investment objective is to seek attractive returns by generating current income from debt investments and capital appreciation from equity related investments. Triangle’s investment philosophy is to partner with business owners, management teams and financial sponsors to provide flexible financing solutions to fund growth, changes of control, or other corporate events. Triangle typically invests $5.0 million – $20.0 million per transaction in companies with annual revenues between $20.0 million and $100.0 million and EBITDA between $3.0 million and $20.0 million.
Triangle has elected to be treated as a business development company under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“1940 Act”). Triangle is required to comply with a series of regulatory requirements under the 1940 Act as well as applicable NYSE, federal and state laws and regulations. Triangle has elected to be treated as a regulated investment company under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Failure to comply with any of the laws and regulations that apply to Triangle could have a material adverse effect on Triangle and its stockholders.
Forward Looking Statements
This press release may contain forward looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Any such statements, other than statements of historical fact, are likely to be affected by other unknowable future events and conditions, including elements of the future that are or are not under the Company’s control, and that the Company may or may not have considered; accordingly, such statements cannot be guarantees or assurances of any aspect of future performance. Actual developments and results are highly likely to vary materially from these estimates and projections of the future and some of these uncertainties are enumerated in Triangle’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements are included in our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K, each as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Copies are available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Such statements speak only as of the time when made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update any such statement now or in the future
http://tourism9.com/
订阅：
博文 (Atom)